Blessing or Curse? Editors Examine Blogs’ Role in ’60 Minutes’ Uproar

Filed as News on September 18, 2004 10:11 pm

by Duncan

Repost This

The scrutiny starts to go both ways
Editor & Publisher> The current controversy over the validity of documents pushed in large part by bloggers and purporting to prove that President Bush received special treatment in the National Guard shows that partisan Internet pundits are having a growing impact on mainstream press, for better or worse, according to several newspaper editors. read more>

This post was written by

You can visit the for a short bio, more posts, and other information about the author.

Submissions & Subscriptions

Submit the post to Reddit, StumbleUpon, Digg or Del.icio.us.

Did you like it? Then subscribe to our RSS feed!



  1. By A.R.Yngve posted on September 19, 2004 at 5:02 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Oh no! The Printed Press will scrutinize blogging! I am so scared!
    *rolls eyes*

    Sarcasm aside… it’s nice that the “Fourth Estate” has finally become aware of the new competition. Go ahead, write as much as you like. Bloggers will only get more readers that way (and newspapers even less).

    But the journalistic paranoia is amusing. Some reporters seem to actually believe in a vast blogging conspiracy, masterfully orchestrated from the White House. (Does that mean we get paid? Mr. Rove, I want my payola NOW!)

    Imagine, that grown men could be so immature.

    There is no blogger conspiracy. Blogging isn’t “controlled” — that’s what makes it dynamic and interesting (and scares the crap out of Old Media, apparently).

    -A.R.Yngve
    http://yngve.bravehost.com