Live Journal blogger has mother killed

This is a story that has been floating around for a while in the blogosphere but we’ve been a little sceptical of its authenticity until an AP wire confirmed the story.

Rachelle Waterman, a 16 year old Live Journal blogger of Ketchikan, Alaska, has been charged with 1st degree murder following the killing of her mother, according to the criminal complaint laid in the Craig District Court.

Her mother, 48-year-old Lauri Waterman, was found barbequed in a burning van following the solicitation by Rachel of two extremely stupid boyfriends to knock her off.

Her last post to her blog (since removed) indicated that her mother had been murdered and the police where about to seize her computer, however she gave no indication of her role in the conspiracy.

Glassdog alleges that the plot arose from her mothers wish to send her to fat camp.

We say there is a worrying trend emerging amongst Live Journal users.

Businesses finding blogs a useful promotion tool

David Canton writes at CNews> “Blogging is now considered an innovative marketing tool that corporations can use to better service their customer, employee and supplier relations. It’s no longer perceived as merely a medium where computer savvy techies share their daily thoughts with others with similar interests.”
read more>

America’s first Blog mogul?

Nick Denton talks to the Independent’s Edward Helmore about the Gawker Empire, and they label him America’s first Blog mogul, which in itself is an interesting turn of phrase, given that defines mogul as a member of the force that under Baber conquered India in 1526 or a Mongol or Mongolian, neither of which Nick is, or “a very rich or powerful person; a magnate”. Either way, an interesting read.

The politics of blogrolls

Duncan Riley> There was a great response to the post on “Building blog traffic for newbies” from last week both in comments, traffic and direct emails. The guide was purposely short and sweet and a number of things have been raised with me directly since, and I’ll slowly detail each one in the lead up to Christmas.

I was taken to task over my comments about not linking to major blogs as they wouldn’t return the favour. This was a general statement that does not apply to every blog in the top 100 or even 1000, but just most of them, and there is only limited value in promoting a new blog by linking to a top 100 blog, however I am not, nor am I encouraging people to not link to top blogs.

The politics of blogrolls continues to evolve at a similar pace to the general blogosphere. What once was a way of demonstrating that you had friends, blogrolls have evolved into a place new bloggers and traffic-junkies alike crave to have their blogs listed.

Before I proceed, I would note that I use the term blogroll in a generic sense to describe a list of links to other blogs found on a blog, not as an endorsement of the Blogrolling service, indeed, I would actively discourage the use of Blogrolling due to its use of javascript.

The 5 rules of Blogrolls

1. Have one.
One of the wonders of the blogosphere is the ability to discover new sites and read new things often by cruising the links in a blogroll. It can also be seen as a reflection of your interests, your readership or influence. Not having a blog roll may also open you to criticism: Jeremy Zawodny once named not have a blogroll as No.6 in the top 10 of The 10 Habits of Highly Annoying Bloggers and I do remember other instances of bloggers being criticized for not having blogrolls

2. Be generous with links
Bigger is not necessarily better, but there is merit in spreading the love of a blog roll with fellow bloggers.

3. Reciprocate
This is easier the younger or smaller your blog is. In the early days I would eagerly place into technorati to see who was linking, and I would often find myself adding a link in the blogroll back to them if they hadn’t already asked for one. There was fun in seeing how many links there was although I’€™ll leave this story to another post one day on “true confessions of traffic-junkies”

If you’ve got better things to do than type your blogs URL into technorati, and are keen on building up links in both directions leave a note at the end of your blogroll saying you’re happy to swap links or reciprocate to those linking to you. You’ll be surprised with the result you’ll get. Always where possible respond to the requests, even if you don’t provide a link: as a rule I won’t link from the Blog Herald to porn, gambling (unless its a paid ad) or commercial material (again unless its paid for). You will get emails from commercial companies of dubious repute asking you to swap links, don’t get involved. By all means though do swap links with commercial blogs, but only when they are legitimate, for example Weblogsinc or Gawker blogs

4. Blind link
I also tossed up calling this “linking for love without gratification” but was worried about what the Google spider might think :-)
If you cruising the blogosphere and find a site you like, link to it. This can be a positive reflection on your personality, particularly if you blog is a personal blog as opposed to a topical blog. I’ve mentioned that there isn’t a lot of benefit in linking to the big blogs, which in terms of building traffic and profile there isn’t, but as a reflection of your personality and beliefs its great. See any number of blogs of political persuasion to get the idea. They may even end up reciprocating from the link on day as well.
In topical blogs linking is often a service that is better served by topical links, a gadget blog would do well to link to engadget and gizmodo for example.

5. Ask
If you never ask for a link on someone’s blogroll you’ll never know. Even if they don’t have a statement pertaining to their blogroll on the site ask anyway, the worst they can say is no, or not respond.
There are two things to be aware of in asking, methodology and rejection.
In methodology it is important to consider the method in which you ask for a link to the blogroll.
Sending an email saying “Hi I read your site, will you link to me?” has a very small chance of success and personally I would either ignore this or respond saying “where’s the link to the Blog Herald???”. A rude response, true, but I take the request to be rude as well. The request says I don’t really care about your blog and all I want is a link. There is no right way or wrong way to ask the question but use the rule “would I respond to an email like this?”. Whilst in the early days of a new blog the answer may be yes if your really desperate to drive traffic, for most it would be no to the first example.
Instead try something along these lines, but try not to sound to contrived
I really like/love/ enjoy (select one) your blog and am an avid reader. I’ve recently added a link to xxxxx to my blog which is about xxxx and was wondering if you would consider providing a link back to me?
Regards and keep up the good work xxxx”
Yes, it probably sounds a little contrived here but the more you personalise the email and, in all due honesty, suck up to the person your trying to get the link from, the better. After a long day filtering through the spam and other rubbish in my inbox a nice, genuine request for a link is often dealt with immediately but one that is short, generic and obviously self serving (i.e. gimme, gimme) is ignored.
Be prepared for rejection, and don’t flip out if you are rejected.
Rejection can come through an email response or through not receiving a reply for your request (and hence no link). First things first, remember big blogs (and even medium sized blogs like the Blog Herald) are often run for love and like you time is to spend on blogging is often limited.
Some bloggers will respond with a thank you but I’m not adding to the list now, or your blog doesn’t fit my criteria, or another reason. Accept this, perhaps even email back and thank them for responding and wishing them the best of luck or similar. They’ve had the courtesy of responding and it’s their choice to link or not to link, a choice you also have with your own blog. Do not, under any circumstances, send back a nasty email or slam them on your blog. It may bring in some extra traffic but memories are surprisingly long in the blogosphere and people remember.
Many will just not respond to your email. Don’t take it personally, its not because they don’t like you, it’s just a time issue. Again another warning, do not inflame the situation by emailing again saying “why haven’t you responded? ” or abusive comments for non-response. Although I have personally had a few requests for links I have not responded to, mainly due to an influx of email and a mental note to get back to the request that is subsequently forgotten, I’ve also responded to requests 4 and 6 weeks later (yes, I learned to file them!). I’ve also had the odd rude email that said nasty things or demanded that I provide a link . Guess what, after that they never got a look in. I even remember once where I put up a link and forgot to email the blogger. A week later I got an abusive email saying why hadn’t I provided a link when I had. Suffice to say the link was removed.

Its probably a good time to mention context: if you’re a black lesbian left handed pot smoking autistic female blogger, don’t bother asking for a link from a evangelical ku klux klan white male 4WD (SUV) driver from Texas. An exaggeration maybe but if what your writing about is diametrically opposed to the blog your want a link from you won’t get the link 99% of the time, and you might get a nasty email in response as well.

Any thoughts, post a comment.

Blog gets Kitsap deputy chief in trouble

The deputy chief of Kitsap County Central Communications in Washington State has been suspended from his job following posts on his Live Journal blog that included the following comments:

“[I am] disappointed in my co-workers, some of whom appear to be nothing more than self-indulgent, greedy bastards willing to lie cheat and steal to get ahead. People with no sense of personal responsibility, unwilling to accept the consequences of their actions and decisions. How else to explain this act of extortion they’re perpetrating?
‘€œToday I learned that people I’ve trusted, people I’ve admired as good, honest people, are in fact as greedy and base as the next bastard. Today I learned that the ideals of public service, healing others, and accepting the ramifications of ones’ own decisions are foreign concepts to my co-workers. Today I learned that any moral fiber, any sense of right or wrong, has been extricated by the battlecry ‘Management is the enemy!’ and ‘Get what you can! Get what you can! Too much is not enough!’ I have not been this disenchanted with my chosen profession ever before.”

The blog, Ineptia Vitae – We the People, was not accessible at the time of this post.

Perhaps we need to start a new public awareness campaign: “Think before you post!”

(source: Central Kitsap Reporter)

Has Orkut launched a blog?

This in an email from Orkut

Today all of us here at orkut are pleased to announce the launch of orkut media, a weekly collection of writings and photos by our very own orkut members.
[Editors note: sounds like a blog]

When you land at, you’ll venture into the realm of love and politics and beyond. [just like a blog]

The only thing missing is comments….

Legal threats on the horizon for US bloggers

Thanks to Christopher Cross of Lost in America we’ve become aware of a number of issues that have the potential to threaten free speech for US bloggers:
1. Proposed Bill (H.R. 3261) holds the probability of being passed. The bill may impose serious consequences on blog publishers in part by the specific provisions in the Bill and will see Internet commuication regulated by the Federal Trade Commission, the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and the Register of Copyrights.
2. The U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing case that involves the Rick Ross Institute and a Cult. The significant aspects of this case is that one of the issues raised is whether or not weblog publishers may publish alleged legally confidential material from confidential informants. It is believed that the Supreme Court will deny an actual hearing and in doing so the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling will stand that found that blog publishers cannot publish alleged legally confidential material for confidential sources.
3. In September 2004 the Federal Election Commission filed its’ Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Dictrict Court District of Columbia ruling in 2002 in regards to its interpretation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2001. The FEC is making a strong play to have jurisdiction specifically over Internent communication and inparticular blog publisher’s who engage in policitical discussions or news reporting.

Whilst not legal experts on US law the issues are none the less concerning.

Blogger goes to new depths to raise revenue

Just when you thought you’d seen every single angle to raise money by blogging, Jeremy Wright of Ensight has posted his services for 3 months of blogging at 5-10 posts per week on ebay.

We’d naturally be sceptical of such an endeavour but Jeremy is a top blogger with a strong background in writing, although the current bidding price at the time of writing of $112.73 USD greatly undervalues his services. Jeremy admits that it is sort of a stunt with this line on his blog: “To be honest, I’m doing this to raise the profile of blogging, plain and simple.”
This is probably as honest and reasonable reason as any. We say good luck to him.

Name E&P’s Blog and Win a Free Sub

No, this is not a paid ad but an opportunity to win from the always excellent Editor & Publisher. Not content in writing insightful and interesting commentary on publishing, E&P are launching their first blog and are calling for suggestions for a name, with a free sub on offer to the successful entry.
Our suggestion is Wordfiend.
Entries to [email protected]