Vale Matt Mullweg

Filed as General on March 31, 2005 3:40 pm

by Duncan

Duncan Riley> yes, I’ve pulled the post about the crucification of Matt Mullenweg over at Waxy.org, life is to short to get into a fight with people over he said/ she said. What is clear though that today on the blogosphere we have experienced the crucification of the reputation of a formerly well respected blogger, Matt Mullenweg, the genius behind WordPress. I suppose that if the blogosphere takes delight in crucifying people in the mainstream media, rightly or wrongly, then I suppose its only natural that we’ll eventually turn on one of our own. I can only encourage those when reporting the post and accusations at Waxy.org to take one step back and question the motives before posting. Matt has made a mistake, we all make mistakes, but is this really necessary? Is it right to destroy the reputation of one who has given so much to the blogosphere without greed nor profit?

This post was written by

You can visit the for a short bio, more posts, and other information about the author.


Submissions & Subscriptions

Submit the post to Reddit, StumbleUpon, Digg or Del.icio.us.

Did you like it? Then subscribe to our RSS feed!



  1. TurboBlogger.com » Taking A Swipe At Matt MullenwegMarch 31, 2005 at 8:50 am
  2. By Arvind posted on March 31, 2005 at 3:51 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Heh so “crucifying” Matt — once — isn’t ok, but continuous jabs again 6A/Mena is ok? Lets see, Matt went about raising money but decided to do it in questionable ways, 6A went about raising money, and although they messed up the first time they at least it wasn’t in an unscrupulous manner. Now don’t get me wrong I think Matt’s a great guy (from the little interaction I’ve had with him) and I’d be interested in his explanation but I find your posts far more intruiging

  3. By Duncan posted on March 31, 2005 at 3:59 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    You miss a main point, Matt was raising money to support WordPress not self enrichment, Mena was in it for the money for herself. WordPress is, and will always be Opensource.

  4. Mangas VerdesMarch 31, 2005 at 6:11 pm
  5. By Dylan posted on March 31, 2005 at 11:12 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    “Matt was raising money to support WordPress not self enrichment”

    How do you know this? Matt has never said where any of the money has gone nor how much has ever been raised. There’s no transparency there.

    “Mena was in it for the money for herself.”

    Errrm, Mena? Don’t you mean Six Apart (which includes a LOT of people other than Mena, although you rarely seem to acknowledge that). This would be more aptly put by saying that “a corporation desired to make money from its product”. God forbid!

    Open source really has nothing to do with this and I doubt that you really have so much against the tenets of basic capitalism.

  6. Blogosphere News: Blog News from Bloggers, for BloggersApril 1, 2005 at 12:41 am
  7. By tzar posted on April 1, 2005 at 12:56 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Ow!
    Totally agree with Duncan! Matt is frontman in promoting opensource.
    Btw nasty to drop this while Matt is on holiday in Europe…

  8. Denken Ãœber » Wordpress y el posicionamiento en buscadoresApril 1, 2005 at 10:39 pm
  9. Google NewsSeptember 3, 2007 at 11:02 pm