<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google bans WordPress, Baio deletes comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: anthonymcg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-20344</link>
		<dc:creator>anthonymcg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/#comment-20344</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Storm in a WordPress?&lt;/strong&gt;
I&#039;ve been reading this morning of Matt Mullenweg&#039;s alleged attempt to fool Google&#039;s AdSense program by placing hidden key words within pages on WordPress.org. The WordPress site has a great PageRank and as a result is quite coveted by advertisers. A...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Storm in a WordPress?</strong><br />
I&#8217;ve been reading this morning of Matt Mullenweg&#8217;s alleged attempt to fool Google&#8217;s AdSense program by placing hidden key words within pages on WordPress.org. The WordPress site has a great PageRank and as a result is quite coveted by advertisers. A&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-20340</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/#comment-20340</guid>
		<description>We all wish it was Ric, but alas its not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all wish it was Ric, but alas its not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-20339</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/#comment-20339</guid>
		<description>Is this some kind of &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.com/2005/04/01/april-fool-on-the-wordpress-community/&quot;&gt;April Fool&#039;s Joke?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this some kind of <a href="http://wordpress.com/2005/04/01/april-fool-on-the-wordpress-community/">April Fool&#8217;s Joke?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-20337</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 04:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/#comment-20337</guid>
		<description>Telling him your going to write about it and posting what you did are two totally different things, the implication of what you have written personally goes to Matts motives. 
As for offensive, offensive is the use of bad launguage, not dissent, what you peddle Mr Baio is censorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telling him your going to write about it and posting what you did are two totally different things, the implication of what you have written personally goes to Matts motives.<br />
As for offensive, offensive is the use of bad launguage, not dissent, what you peddle Mr Baio is censorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Baio</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-20334</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Baio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 03:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/#comment-20334</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m censoring opposing opinions, then why are so many of the comments in the thread from Wordpress supporters?

Like I stated in the comments, I was going to delete comments from either side that resorted to petty name-calling and flame-baiting.  I removed five or six comments from both sides of the issue, but yours was easily the worst of the bunch:

&quot;Shame on most of you, but more particularly you, Mr Baio for your crucifiction of a guy who has given so much to the blogging community without personal enrichment. Sure, he&#039;s made a mistake, but did you tell him in your IM conversation but as soon as he left the country you were going to nail him on a cross and destroy his reputation. Surely this post can only demonstrate that the blogosphere has now truly gone mainstream, because we are now capable of climbing into the same low gutter as the mainstream media. Maybe next time your &#039;hesitant&#039; you&#039;ll think twice before posting.&quot;

It added absolutely nothing to the discussion, and was insulting both to me personally and the blogosphere at large.  Were you really surprised I removed it?

To answer your one question, yes.  I told him in IM that I was going to write about it on my site after he responded.  Here&#039;s the relevant part of the chat transcript:

[06:43] waxpancake: FYI, after you respond, I&#039;m probably going to link to this or write a front-page post.
[06:43] waxpancake: Just so you&#039;re not surprised
[06:44] saxmatt02: eh, I&#039;d just as soon take it down but they&#039;ve already paid for the month

So there you go.  Feel free to confirm this with Matt when he gets back if you don&#039;t believe me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m censoring opposing opinions, then why are so many of the comments in the thread from WordPress supporters?</p>
<p>Like I stated in the comments, I was going to delete comments from either side that resorted to petty name-calling and flame-baiting.  I removed five or six comments from both sides of the issue, but yours was easily the worst of the bunch:</p>
<p>&#8220;Shame on most of you, but more particularly you, Mr Baio for your crucifiction of a guy who has given so much to the blogging community without personal enrichment. Sure, he&#8217;s made a mistake, but did you tell him in your IM conversation but as soon as he left the country you were going to nail him on a cross and destroy his reputation. Surely this post can only demonstrate that the blogosphere has now truly gone mainstream, because we are now capable of climbing into the same low gutter as the mainstream media. Maybe next time your &#8216;hesitant&#8217; you&#8217;ll think twice before posting.&#8221;</p>
<p>It added absolutely nothing to the discussion, and was insulting both to me personally and the blogosphere at large.  Were you really surprised I removed it?</p>
<p>To answer your one question, yes.  I told him in IM that I was going to write about it on my site after he responded.  Here&#8217;s the relevant part of the chat transcript:</p>
<p>[06:43] waxpancake: FYI, after you respond, I&#8217;m probably going to link to this or write a front-page post.<br />
[06:43] waxpancake: Just so you&#8217;re not surprised<br />
[06:44] saxmatt02: eh, I&#8217;d just as soon take it down but they&#8217;ve already paid for the month</p>
<p>So there you go.  Feel free to confirm this with Matt when he gets back if you don&#8217;t believe me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trench</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-20333</link>
		<dc:creator>Trench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 03:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/#comment-20333</guid>
		<description>I typed in the phrase &quot;wordpress&quot; at Google and WordPress.org was the first listing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I typed in the phrase &#8220;wordpress&#8221; at Google and WordPress.org was the first listing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-20332</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 03:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/01/google-bans-wordpress-baio-deletes-comments/#comment-20332</guid>
		<description>Yessir. But you deleted and ENTIRE post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yessir. But you deleted and ENTIRE post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

