<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Blogger under fire for system outages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Elliot</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-21050</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 06:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/#comment-21050</guid>
		<description>Based on my member #, I&#039;d guess there are at least 10 million *accounts*. However, how many of those are orphaned from two or three years back?

As a Blogger user, all I can say is that the vast majority of us do use it for free, so what do we have to complain about? And those who are paying for it know it is going through upgrades; however, I&#039;m sure that, unlike myself, their posts are so choice and demanding and time sensitive that they must be blogged *immediately*!!!

Um, not to be snarky or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on my member #, I&#8217;d guess there are at least 10 million *accounts*. However, how many of those are orphaned from two or three years back?</p>
<p>As a Blogger user, all I can say is that the vast majority of us do use it for free, so what do we have to complain about? And those who are paying for it know it is going through upgrades; however, I&#8217;m sure that, unlike myself, their posts are so choice and demanding and time sensitive that they must be blogged *immediately*!!!</p>
<p>Um, not to be snarky or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-21039</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/#comment-21039</guid>
		<description>Look at the URL for my Blog. That&#039;s right. I switched to typepad because I simply got tired of dealing with the inability to access my blog, the inability to post.

I just simply left. I wonder how many others have followed me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the URL for my Blog. That&#8217;s right. I switched to typepad because I simply got tired of dealing with the inability to access my blog, the inability to post.</p>
<p>I just simply left. I wonder how many others have followed me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Lawyers :: Have Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-21026</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Lawyers :: Have Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/#comment-21026</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google&#8217;s Blogger having system outages&lt;/strong&gt;

The Blog Herald reports Blogger is taking some flack for system outages. Blogger, free blog software with limited features and design, has been getting some heat from users but as the Herald reports, things got a little hotter with Wired...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google&rsquo;s Blogger having system outages</strong></p>
<p>The Blog Herald reports Blogger is taking some flack for system outages. Blogger, free blog software with limited features and design, has been getting some heat from users but as the Herald reports, things got a little hotter with Wired&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: site admin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-21021</link>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/#comment-21021</guid>
		<description>If its 70% it would have to have atleast 15 million blogs, if not more, but we just dont know because they wont release their figures. I might have to start emailing them and asking nicely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If its 70% it would have to have atleast 15 million blogs, if not more, but we just dont know because they wont release their figures. I might have to start emailing them and asking nicely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goose3five</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-21017</link>
		<dc:creator>Goose3five</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/04/07/googles-blogger-under-fire-for-system-outages/#comment-21017</guid>
		<description>Everything I have read puts Blogger at roughly 70%
market share. I can see the public utility comparison.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything I have read puts Blogger at roughly 70%<br />
market share. I can see the public utility comparison.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

