<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solution proposed on content theft problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: site admin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-30256</link>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/#comment-30256</guid>
		<description>Vix
I particularly like the text advertising option, mainly because I feel its lower impact than what Google is offering, got to say up front I find Google Adsense RSS ads annoying, but I cant say I&#039;ve stopped reading a feed because of them, and with my marketing hat on, I know annoying ads can be good ads because at least they are being noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vix<br />
I particularly like the text advertising option, mainly because I feel its lower impact than what Google is offering, got to say up front I find Google Adsense RSS ads annoying, but I cant say I&#8217;ve stopped reading a feed because of them, and with my marketing hat on, I know annoying ads can be good ads because at least they are being noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vix</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-30230</link>
		<dc:creator>Vix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 06:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/#comment-30230</guid>
		<description>Adam raises a good point, will it get you in trouble if you have Google Ads appearing on another site?

As a user, text ads are not irritating and I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing the ads. 

But aside from that how about a link promoting your other blogs ala &quot;See more at Weblog Empire&quot;.  This would be good for cross promotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam raises a good point, will it get you in trouble if you have Google Ads appearing on another site?</p>
<p>As a user, text ads are not irritating and I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing the ads. </p>
<p>But aside from that how about a link promoting your other blogs ala &#8220;See more at Weblog Empire&#8221;.  This would be good for cross promotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-30228</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 05:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/#comment-30228</guid>
		<description>But while ads / copyright notices CAN be stripped, I&#039;d guess that blogs with those things in &#039;em would be skipped in favor of &quot;more easily swiped&quot; content.  The scumsters who steal content are sometimes more lazy than unethical.

I just hope no spamjerk steals my content with ads in it and then gets ME in trouble with AdSense due to having the banners surrounded by inappropriate content .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But while ads / copyright notices CAN be stripped, I&#8217;d guess that blogs with those things in &#8216;em would be skipped in favor of &#8220;more easily swiped&#8221; content.  The scumsters who steal content are sometimes more lazy than unethical.</p>
<p>I just hope no spamjerk steals my content with ads in it and then gets ME in trouble with AdSense due to having the banners surrounded by inappropriate content .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graywolf</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-30227</link>
		<dc:creator>graywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 04:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/#comment-30227</guid>
		<description>If someone is going to republish your content it won&#039;t be to hard to strip out the copyright programatically</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone is going to republish your content it won&#8217;t be to hard to strip out the copyright programatically</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Benningfield</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-30225</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Benningfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 03:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/06/02/solution-proposed-on-content-theft-problem/#comment-30225</guid>
		<description>Duncan: When wearing my user hat, I&#039;d probably prefer the ads. Downloading redundant copyright info seems silly... if there&#039;s gonna be wasted bytes, why not let you have a chance to make some money off of them?

However, unlike a customized copyright notice, an ad will be easy for downstream aggregators to strip. There&#039;s really no reason for them to strip anything (your ads don&#039;t hurt them), but it&#039;s still something to consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan: When wearing my user hat, I&#8217;d probably prefer the ads. Downloading redundant copyright info seems silly&#8230; if there&#8217;s gonna be wasted bytes, why not let you have a chance to make some money off of them?</p>
<p>However, unlike a customized copyright notice, an ad will be easy for downstream aggregators to strip. There&#8217;s really no reason for them to strip anything (your ads don&#8217;t hurt them), but it&#8217;s still something to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

