<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs influence tight-arses: study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: taughnee</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/comment-page-1/#comment-41874</link>
		<dc:creator>taughnee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/#comment-41874</guid>
		<description>I find world hunger offensive.  *shrug* 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find world hunger offensive.  *shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jozef imrich</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/comment-page-1/#comment-41855</link>
		<dc:creator>jozef imrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 13:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/#comment-41855</guid>
		<description>PS: Oops, I meant to draw this entry to your attention from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogometer.nationaljournal.com/ &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blogometer &lt;/a&gt;

THOUGHT OF THE DAY: Maybe There&#039;s Hope For The &quot;Online Magazine&quot; Movement After All

The Blog Herald: &quot;More interesting research, this time from Nielsen//Netratings that found that a decent sized portion of blog readers don&#039;t actually realize they are reading blogs, and not only that, they don&#039;t even know what a blog is. The survey found that 13% of people who visited blogs didn&#039;t know what a blog was, and more incredibly 66% of people visiting a blog didn&#039;t realize they were visiting a blog, basically they just thought it was another web site. Whether this is bad I don&#039;t know. I&#039;m sure people here would work it out: the &#039;blog&#039; in the &#039;Blog Herald&#039; would probably give it away, but the question remains, is it really a bad thing that the majority of blog readers don&#039;t actually realize they are reading blogs? If they did would they think less of the sites?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: Oops, I meant to draw this entry to your attention from: <a href="http://blogometer.nationaljournal.com/ " rel="nofollow">Blogometer </a></p>
<p>THOUGHT OF THE DAY: Maybe There&#8217;s Hope For The &#8220;Online Magazine&#8221; Movement After All</p>
<p>The Blog Herald: &#8220;More interesting research, this time from Nielsen//Netratings that found that a decent sized portion of blog readers don&#8217;t actually realize they are reading blogs, and not only that, they don&#8217;t even know what a blog is. The survey found that 13% of people who visited blogs didn&#8217;t know what a blog was, and more incredibly 66% of people visiting a blog didn&#8217;t realize they were visiting a blog, basically they just thought it was another web site. Whether this is bad I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m sure people here would work it out: the &#8216;blog&#8217; in the &#8216;Blog Herald&#8217; would probably give it away, but the question remains, is it really a bad thing that the majority of blog readers don&#8217;t actually realize they are reading blogs? If they did would they think less of the sites?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jozef imrich</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/comment-page-1/#comment-41845</link>
		<dc:creator>jozef imrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/#comment-41845</guid>
		<description>Duncan, but one must give them 10 out of 10 for having the balls to come out publically with this amazing fairy tale ;-)

By the way, thanks for the pointer to BBC I try to archive as many stories along those lines as possible ...

Even Herald has no choice but print offensive sounding blogs: So another case of note and How Appealing is also monitoring the progress:

The Unbearable Lightness of Blogging 
Margo Kingston of Webdiary Fame was absolutely astounded when she read about the fate of a blog named &quot;Hunter Holden Sucks&quot;
 G&#039;day. Here&#039;s a successful legal ploy you can expect more of by people with lots of money to use to close down criticism on the web by people with little money. What do you think?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/margo_kingston/001297.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Shutting down blogs: &quot;sucks&quot; and the tort of injurious falsehood &lt;/a&gt; [Shannon &lt;a href=&quot;http://shannonc.blogs.com/shannonsays/2005/07/the_car_dealer_.html &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Car Dealer &amp; The Blogger &lt;/a&gt;; Technology and IP Business &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.djacobson.com/technology_business/2005/07/no_right_of_fre.html &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
No right of free speech for Australian critical website&lt;/a&gt;; 3g newsroom &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.3gnewsroom.com/phorum-3.4.8a/read.php?f=34&amp;i=11039&amp;t=11039 &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Legal threat to bloggers &lt;/a&gt;; ethics forum &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ethics.org.au/ethics_forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1100 &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Legal threat to online posts  &lt;/a&gt;]
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, but one must give them 10 out of 10 for having the balls to come out publically with this amazing fairy tale ;-)</p>
<p>By the way, thanks for the pointer to BBC I try to archive as many stories along those lines as possible &#8230;</p>
<p>Even Herald has no choice but print offensive sounding blogs: So another case of note and How Appealing is also monitoring the progress:</p>
<p>The Unbearable Lightness of Blogging<br />
Margo Kingston of Webdiary Fame was absolutely astounded when she read about the fate of a blog named &#8220;Hunter Holden Sucks&#8221;<br />
 G&#8217;day. Here&#8217;s a successful legal ploy you can expect more of by people with lots of money to use to close down criticism on the web by people with little money. What do you think?<br />
<a href="http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/margo_kingston/001297.html" rel="nofollow"> Shutting down blogs: &#8220;sucks&#8221; and the tort of injurious falsehood </a> [Shannon <a href="http://shannonc.blogs.com/shannonsays/2005/07/the_car_dealer_.html " rel="nofollow">The Car Dealer &amp; The Blogger </a>; Technology and IP Business <a href="http://www.djacobson.com/technology_business/2005/07/no_right_of_fre.html " rel="nofollow"><br />
No right of free speech for Australian critical website</a>; 3g newsroom <a href="http://www.3gnewsroom.com/phorum-3.4.8a/read.php?f=34&amp;i=11039&amp;t=11039 " rel="nofollow"> Legal threat to bloggers </a>; ethics forum <a href="http://www.ethics.org.au/ethics_forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1100 " rel="nofollow">Legal threat to online posts  </a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/comment-page-1/#comment-41843</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/#comment-41843</guid>
		<description>Sorry John, it&#039;s a common expression here in Australia which wouldn&#039;t usually raise an eyebrow, I tossed up not using it but its the best way I could take the piss out of one of the most useless studies I&#039;ve seen to date. Imagine, 14,000 people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry John, it&#8217;s a common expression here in Australia which wouldn&#8217;t usually raise an eyebrow, I tossed up not using it but its the best way I could take the piss out of one of the most useless studies I&#8217;ve seen to date. Imagine, 14,000 people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Blossom</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/comment-page-1/#comment-41784</link>
		<dc:creator>John Blossom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/#comment-41784</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d link to this entry but I find the headline to be offensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d link to this entry but I find the headline to be offensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John (SYNTAGMA)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/comment-page-1/#comment-41772</link>
		<dc:creator>John (SYNTAGMA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/19/blogs-influence-tight-arses-study/#comment-41772</guid>
		<description>I wonder! ... I sometimes have to pass a store called Poundland, where everything is Â£1. Looking at the customers coming out, I just can&#039;t imagine most of them tapping away at a computer keyboard. The only exceptions would be the very young ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder! &#8230; I sometimes have to pass a store called Poundland, where everything is Â£1. Looking at the customers coming out, I just can&#8217;t imagine most of them tapping away at a computer keyboard. The only exceptions would be the very young ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

