<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calacanis suggests Comscore survey is dodgy: Denton, Trott money may have influenced results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/09/calacanis-sugggests-comscore-survey-is-dodgy-denton-trott-money-may-have-influenced-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/09/calacanis-sugggests-comscore-survey-is-dodgy-denton-trott-money-may-have-influenced-results/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Trudy W. Schuett</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/09/calacanis-sugggests-comscore-survey-is-dodgy-denton-trott-money-may-have-influenced-results/comment-page-1/#comment-44246</link>
		<dc:creator>Trudy W. Schuett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/09/calacanis-sugggests-comscore-survey-is-dodgy-denton-trott-money-may-have-influenced-results/#comment-44246</guid>
		<description>Privately-funded research is referred to as &quot;advocacy research&quot; in the social/human services area, and is generally considered to be suspect or at least not on the same level of relevance/authority as research done by independent agencies.

I can see Calacanis&#039; point in this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privately-funded research is referred to as &#8220;advocacy research&#8221; in the social/human services area, and is generally considered to be suspect or at least not on the same level of relevance/authority as research done by independent agencies.</p>
<p>I can see Calacanis&#8217; point in this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

