<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Corp to buy Blinkx, not Technorati</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/15/news-corp-to-buy-blinkx-not-technorati/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/15/news-corp-to-buy-blinkx-not-technorati/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: AndB</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/15/news-corp-to-buy-blinkx-not-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-44936</link>
		<dc:creator>AndB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/15/news-corp-to-buy-blinkx-not-technorati/#comment-44936</guid>
		<description>Judging from the papers, News Corp to buy Blinkx, looks more certain. I can see why, this is an innovative search tool, the first to lauch into Video and Audio search. I agree, if Murdoch wants to propell himself into the .com arena this will probably be a successful way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging from the papers, News Corp to buy Blinkx, looks more certain. I can see why, this is an innovative search tool, the first to lauch into Video and Audio search. I agree, if Murdoch wants to propell himself into the .com arena this will probably be a successful way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/15/news-corp-to-buy-blinkx-not-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-44589</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/15/news-corp-to-buy-blinkx-not-technorati/#comment-44589</guid>
		<description>Blinkx already has ties to fox news reels, so I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the acquisition went through. Murdoch should be aggressive about entering online media; buying blinkx is a step in the right direction...but i think he&#039;s surely on the lookout for proven, innovative technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blinkx already has ties to fox news reels, so I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the acquisition went through. Murdoch should be aggressive about entering online media; buying blinkx is a step in the right direction&#8230;but i think he&#8217;s surely on the lookout for proven, innovative technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John (SYNTAGMA)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/15/news-corp-to-buy-blinkx-not-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-44580</link>
		<dc:creator>John (SYNTAGMA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/08/15/news-corp-to-buy-blinkx-not-technorati/#comment-44580</guid>
		<description>We had the same with Murdoch and SKYPE a couple of weeks ago. News Corp is a content provider and won&#039;t get involved in geeky, tweaky things. It sat out the dot-com bubble after all. Dave Sifry&#039;s uncharacteristic silence suggests BL Ochman&#039;s report has legs. My bet is still on Google, but I&#039;m open to being surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had the same with Murdoch and SKYPE a couple of weeks ago. News Corp is a content provider and won&#8217;t get involved in geeky, tweaky things. It sat out the dot-com bubble after all. Dave Sifry&#8217;s uncharacteristic silence suggests BL Ochman&#8217;s report has legs. My bet is still on Google, but I&#8217;m open to being surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

