<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mena Trott defends spamming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-70264</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-70264</guid>
		<description>&quot;People are really, really pissed over TypePad, but all we get from SA is more spin and no substance.&quot;

Not me, and I&#039;ve been using TypePad since their beta testing. Yes, it was kind of annoying when things were slow, but we&#039;ve all been offered a free month of service as a result (or more, up to 45 days)...seems to me that&#039;s substance over spin.

I agree with Greybeard: You&#039;re making a mountain out of a molehill. SixApart have publicly apologized for the slowdown and have offered all of us free service, no questions asked. Just request the amount of free compensation you want and you got it. If people are still &quot;really pissed&quot; after that, then those people just enjoy griping.

Please move on from the SixApart stuff. The story is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;People are really, really pissed over TypePad, but all we get from SA is more spin and no substance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not me, and I&#8217;ve been using TypePad since their beta testing. Yes, it was kind of annoying when things were slow, but we&#8217;ve all been offered a free month of service as a result (or more, up to 45 days)&#8230;seems to me that&#8217;s substance over spin.</p>
<p>I agree with Greybeard: You&#8217;re making a mountain out of a molehill. SixApart have publicly apologized for the slowdown and have offered all of us free service, no questions asked. Just request the amount of free compensation you want and you got it. If people are still &#8220;really pissed&#8221; after that, then those people just enjoy griping.</p>
<p>Please move on from the SixApart stuff. The story is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greybeard</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-70257</link>
		<dc:creator>Greybeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-70257</guid>
		<description>Ah!  At least you are admitting you are not behaving yourself.  That&#039;s a start.

I don&#039;t see why Six Apart should condemn their PR company: KTA made one small goof by sending *one* e-mail to a blogger that didn&#039;t want to receive it and apologized for it.  That&#039;s the decent thing to do, and it should end there.

I have a feeling you are trying to blow this way out of proportion, thus seriously damaging your credibility as a news source, as someone above pointed out.

Six Apart may have their faults (and they admit it, giving their customers a massive refund for bad service; what other company have you seen doing this lately without lawyers being involved?), but hiring a dodgy PR firm is not one of them.

I&#039;m beginning to wonder, do you own shares in Six Apart&#039;s competitors or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah!  At least you are admitting you are not behaving yourself.  That&#8217;s a start.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see why Six Apart should condemn their PR company: KTA made one small goof by sending *one* e-mail to a blogger that didn&#8217;t want to receive it and apologized for it.  That&#8217;s the decent thing to do, and it should end there.</p>
<p>I have a feeling you are trying to blow this way out of proportion, thus seriously damaging your credibility as a news source, as someone above pointed out.</p>
<p>Six Apart may have their faults (and they admit it, giving their customers a massive refund for bad service; what other company have you seen doing this lately without lawyers being involved?), but hiring a dodgy PR firm is not one of them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to wonder, do you own shares in Six Apart&#8217;s competitors or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-70248</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-70248</guid>
		<description>I tell you what, I&#039;ll behave if SixApart do the following:
1. Be honest with their clients, and stop accepting new business if they cant handle it
2. Stop blaming their clients for their problems
3. Starting condeming their PR company.

Seriously, SixApart is the company I relly, really want to love, I honestly do, I even tried to make things up a while back, but they weren&#039;t interested (their bad). People are really, really pissed over TypePad, but all we get from SA is more spin and no substance. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tell you what, I&#8217;ll behave if SixApart do the following:<br />
1. Be honest with their clients, and stop accepting new business if they cant handle it<br />
2. Stop blaming their clients for their problems<br />
3. Starting condeming their PR company.</p>
<p>Seriously, SixApart is the company I relly, really want to love, I honestly do, I even tried to make things up a while back, but they weren&#8217;t interested (their bad). People are really, really pissed over TypePad, but all we get from SA is more spin and no substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-70240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-70240</guid>
		<description>The Six Apart/TypePad bashing is getting tiring. Considering this site considers itself a &quot;blog news&quot; site I would split the site into two: a &quot;blog news&quot; section where you report objectivly on topics and a proper blog where you provide your own commentary and analysis of the news. This mix you currently provide is confusing and misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Six Apart/TypePad bashing is getting tiring. Considering this site considers itself a &#8220;blog news&#8221; site I would split the site into two: a &#8220;blog news&#8221; section where you report objectivly on topics and a proper blog where you provide your own commentary and analysis of the news. This mix you currently provide is confusing and misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-70216</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-70216</guid>
		<description>Um, defending the PR agency for one. How about something along the lines of &quot;although we are unable to confirm the allegations SixApart views spamming seriously and will take action to stop using the company if the allegation is proven true&quot; or the likes. But of course not, because SixApart would much rather blame their customers and suck up to their PR people wouldn&#039;t they!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, defending the PR agency for one. How about something along the lines of &#8220;although we are unable to confirm the allegations SixApart views spamming seriously and will take action to stop using the company if the allegation is proven true&#8221; or the likes. But of course not, because SixApart would much rather blame their customers and suck up to their PR people wouldn&#8217;t they!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-70208</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 04:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-70208</guid>
		<description>Once again, you show the ugliness of your blatant anti-SixApart crusade. I wonder what is behind it? 

Also, exactly which sentence in Mena&#039;s statement &quot;defends spamming?&quot; I don&#039;t see it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, you show the ugliness of your blatant anti-SixApart crusade. I wonder what is behind it? </p>
<p>Also, exactly which sentence in Mena&#8217;s statement &#8220;defends spamming?&#8221; I don&#8217;t see it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-69888</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-69888</guid>
		<description>Tom Murphy isn&#039;t a fellow Australian, he&#039;s Microsoft Ireland&#039;s PR manager and he was responding to a post on my PR blog. Mena wasn&#039;t defending spamming, she was politely (more politiely than me!) pointing out that Jeremy Zawodney was making extremely misleading statements on his blog which was defamatory to both Sixapart and its PR consultancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Murphy isn&#8217;t a fellow Australian, he&#8217;s Microsoft Ireland&#8217;s PR manager and he was responding to a post on my PR blog. Mena wasn&#8217;t defending spamming, she was politely (more politiely than me!) pointing out that Jeremy Zawodney was making extremely misleading statements on his blog which was defamatory to both Sixapart and its PR consultancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrispian</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-69737</link>
		<dc:creator>chrispian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-69737</guid>
		<description>Wait, she hates &quot;mob mentality that blogging sometimes brings out&quot; .. lol. Welcome to the blogosphere. You would think someone as high in the sphere is Mena would know, when you do wrong, bloggers will bust your chops. lol. And when your on top, your a bigger target than ever. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, she hates &#8220;mob mentality that blogging sometimes brings out&#8221; .. lol. Welcome to the blogosphere. You would think someone as high in the sphere is Mena would know, when you do wrong, bloggers will bust your chops. lol. And when your on top, your a bigger target than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-69722</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-69722</guid>
		<description>Your ugly little anti-Sixapart campaign reminds me of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenewyorkerstore.com/product_details.asp?mscssid=CUT6XG9WQ5UM9GHP4XXN03GPJ7GW768E&amp;sitetype=1&amp;did=4&amp;sid=121304&amp;pid=&amp;keyword=blog+alex+gregory&amp;section=cartoons&amp;title=undefined&amp;whichpage=1&amp;sortBy=popular&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; wonderful little comic strip. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your ugly little anti-Sixapart campaign reminds me of <a href="http://www.thenewyorkerstore.com/product_details.asp?mscssid=CUT6XG9WQ5UM9GHP4XXN03GPJ7GW768E&amp;sitetype=1&amp;did=4&amp;sid=121304&amp;pid=&amp;keyword=blog+alex+gregory&amp;section=cartoons&amp;title=undefined&amp;whichpage=1&amp;sortBy=popular" rel="nofollow">this</a> wonderful little comic strip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-69711</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-69711</guid>
		<description>Headline does seem a bit misleading, Duncan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headline does seem a bit misleading, Duncan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maarten Schenk</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-69692</link>
		<dc:creator>Maarten Schenk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/18/mena-trott-defends-spamming/#comment-69692</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but where in that quote does Mena defend spamming?
That&#039;s something *I* can&#039;t see (perhaps because I&#039;m not Australian?).  Maybe a less misleading headline would be in order?

Disclaimer: I work for Six Apart, and I think I hate spammers as much as Mena does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but where in that quote does Mena defend spamming?<br />
That&#8217;s something *I* can&#8217;t see (perhaps because I&#8217;m not Australian?).  Maybe a less misleading headline would be in order?</p>
<p>Disclaimer: I work for Six Apart, and I think I hate spammers as much as Mena does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

