<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress.com open</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/21/wordpresscom-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/21/wordpresscom-open/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/21/wordpresscom-open/comment-page-1/#comment-70477</link>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/11/21/wordpresscom-open/#comment-70477</guid>
		<description>Personally, I didn&#039;t find it any better than blogspot. Sure, it&#039;s WP, so that means that you have catagories. But the only customization you have is changin the header of the Kubrick template. I&#039;d rather run a blogspot blog where I can do whatever I want with my template. In the future I think that they will be giving users more options, but with no plugins, and no custom themes, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth it right nowl. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I didn&#8217;t find it any better than blogspot. Sure, it&#8217;s WP, so that means that you have catagories. But the only customization you have is changin the header of the Kubrick template. I&#8217;d rather run a blogspot blog where I can do whatever I want with my template. In the future I think that they will be giving users more options, but with no plugins, and no custom themes, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth it right nowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

