<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to give AOL ads special placement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/12/18/google-to-give-aol-ads-special-placement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/12/18/google-to-give-aol-ads-special-placement/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Toivo Lainevool</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2005/12/18/google-to-give-aol-ads-special-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-76609</link>
		<dc:creator>Toivo Lainevool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2005/12/18/google-to-give-aol-ads-special-placement/#comment-76609</guid>
		<description>Its not as bad as that.  If you read the update to the story at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/17/technology/17aol.html?th=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;emc=th&amp;adxnnlx=1134840629-zxGButg+araqr4idxCXF6A

It says:

&quot;If a user searches on Google for a topic for which AOL has content - like information about Madonna - there will be a special section on the bottom right corner of the search results page with links to AOL.com. Technically, AOL will pay for those links, which will be identified as advertising, but Google will give AOL credits to pay for them as part of the deal. They will also carry AOL&#039;s logo, the first time Google has agreed to place graphic ads on its search result pages.&quot;

So publishers don&#039;t have to worry about special treatment AOL ads showing up on their websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not as bad as that.  If you read the update to the story at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/17/technology/17aol.html?th=&#038;adxnnl=1&#038;emc=th&#038;adxnnlx=1134840629-zxGButg+araqr4idxCXF6A" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/17/technology/17aol.html?th=&#038;adxnnl=1&#038;emc=th&#038;adxnnlx=1134840629-zxGButg+araqr4idxCXF6A</a></p>
<p>It says:</p>
<p>&#8220;If a user searches on Google for a topic for which AOL has content &#8211; like information about Madonna &#8211; there will be a special section on the bottom right corner of the search results page with links to AOL.com. Technically, AOL will pay for those links, which will be identified as advertising, but Google will give AOL credits to pay for them as part of the deal. They will also carry AOL&#8217;s logo, the first time Google has agreed to place graphic ads on its search result pages.&#8221;</p>
<p>So publishers don&#8217;t have to worry about special treatment AOL ads showing up on their websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

