9rules CEO Paul Scrivens is launching a sex blog network in conjunction with Sam Sugar.
Rumors that it will be called 69rules have not been confirmed.
If any 9rules members are reading this, how do you guys feel about this?
(via Blognetworkwatch)
You're at: Home • General • 9rules CEO launching Sex Blog network • Filed as General on January 11, 2006 2:48 am
by Duncan Riley
9rules CEO Paul Scrivens is launching a sex blog network in conjunction with Sam Sugar.
Rumors that it will be called 69rules have not been confirmed.
If any 9rules members are reading this, how do you guys feel about this?
(via Blognetworkwatch)
This post was written by
Duncan
You can visit the Author Archive for a short bio, more posts, and other information about the author.
Submit the post to Reddit, StumbleUpon, Digg or Del.icio.us.
Did you like it? Then subscribe to our RSS feed!
Quick Navigation: Back to Top • The Archive • 100 stories • Tags • Random • WordPress Book Reviews
The Blog Herald Copyright © Splashpress Media
About • Affiliates • Books • BH China • BH Japan • Editorial Staff • Policies
Designed by Thord Daniel Hedengren
Powered by WordPress

Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
Another blog network focused on a vertical market. Hmm, or horizontal, or bent over, or…
Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
That’ll be interesting.
Either people will quickly forget it, or it will tarnish the entire brand.
Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
If Gawker blog network can do it, I don’t see why 9rules can’t.
Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
Cowboy,
neither what you nor Scrivs is doing is what I’d regard seriously in the porn stakes. The chap he’s hooked up with on the other hand is a lot more heavy in the porn stakes. We aren’t talking light titilation here :-)
Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
Who the hell do you think Sugar is ? That’s so scrivs. It’s his porn name. Look at the design its a retro scrivish.
Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
Scrivs has explained it to us very well, as he has also done here…
Funny Duncan, that you ask what 9rules members think of it and before Scrivs replied, not one member, BUT – Paul (who, as I recall, had his own) Cowboy (ya’ think gspot might be?) and Duncan (who has more than a couple of ads that are – hmmm – Michael J. with breasts? What’s that all about? LOL)
So, for how many years now has the “main stream” learned marketing techniques from the adult sites? Turn about – fair play?
Besides, Scrivs is his own person. He can do what he wants. He’s let us know and also made it clear that it’s separate. If it turns out to be a mistake, I’m sure we will all learn something from it.
Tarnish the whole brand? Come on Nick;
“There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance – - that principle is contempt prior to investigation.” – Herbert Spencer
If it got THAT bad, we’d all just take the 9rules logo off our Blogs and move on, but I doubt that will happen.
Have A Great Day,
Mark
Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
seriously it just donned onto me i want to run for office and have grandchildren they are going to see the real me. I have to hide behind a veil and not be myself like the rest of Amerika. nah i will be myself.
if you knew me off blog you would say many diff. things. but hey this is our perceptions of a false reality.
Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
I didn’t delete anything but nice attempt. I don’t need to “win” you back just making a point your statements our based on untruths.
Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
i do have bad grammer mayb is a dfense mecanism.
Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment
“…your statements our {sic}* (are) based on untruths.â€?
Cowboy, I have no reason to make a statement based on an “untruth”. Please don’t make libelous references to my character.
* This is a journalistic notation indicating that a quoted source contains an error, when quoted by a later author who sees the spelling error and wishes to indicate that the source material contained the error.