<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9rules: WTF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/15/9rules-wtf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/15/9rules-wtf/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering the blogosphere, Web 2.0, new technology, and related topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:16:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris P.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/15/9rules-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-86855</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/15/9rules-wtf/#comment-86855</guid>
		<description>I think a few of the sites owned by 9rules officers will get the boot, but they&#039;re really just wasting their time with that anyway.

Duncan, if you examine the comments on Tyme&#039;s site carefully, you&#039;ll see some of the 9rules sheep shouting all kinds of tomfoolery, mostly at Cowboy and me. One of these sheep summed things up nicely by saying:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Chris - I think everyone is thinking right now that if you were loyal to 9rules, you wouldnâ€™t be writing for a site that has so little respect for the network you are in.

It doesnâ€™t matter that â€œyouâ€? didnâ€™t say anything. Itâ€™s your association.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Does this not stand in direct opposition to the Scrivs/Tyme/porn thing?

It&#039;s obvious to me that Tyme is making mental reservations so she can feel good about her involvement with 9rules. Frankly, it&#039;s amazing to me that people have already adopted attitudes towards 9rules that smack of such blind fanaticism.

Also, kudos for asking the question, &quot;who is now running the show at 9rules?&quot; Personally, I feel as though a man ought to run his business with conviction and decisiveness. At this point, who knows where Scrivs stands? Will he morph his philosophies tomorrow to accommodate a new officer? Will he continue to let his business by dictated by a few emails from pissed off parents (who then turn to the comments at Tyme&#039;s and drop F bombs like it&#039;s Hiroshima)?

There are so many conflicts of interest going on at 9rules it&#039;s amazing. They&#039;ve pretzeled themselves up nicely; now we can all sit back and watch while they try and unravel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a few of the sites owned by 9rules officers will get the boot, but they&#8217;re really just wasting their time with that anyway.</p>
<p>Duncan, if you examine the comments on Tyme&#8217;s site carefully, you&#8217;ll see some of the 9rules sheep shouting all kinds of tomfoolery, mostly at Cowboy and me. One of these sheep summed things up nicely by saying:</p>
<blockquote><p>Chris &#8211; I think everyone is thinking right now that if you were loyal to 9rules, you wouldnâ€™t be writing for a site that has so little respect for the network you are in.</p>
<p>It doesnâ€™t matter that â€œyouâ€? didnâ€™t say anything. Itâ€™s your association.</p></blockquote>
<p>Does this not stand in direct opposition to the Scrivs/Tyme/porn thing?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious to me that Tyme is making mental reservations so she can feel good about her involvement with 9rules. Frankly, it&#8217;s amazing to me that people have already adopted attitudes towards 9rules that smack of such blind fanaticism.</p>
<p>Also, kudos for asking the question, &#8220;who is now running the show at 9rules?&#8221; Personally, I feel as though a man ought to run his business with conviction and decisiveness. At this point, who knows where Scrivs stands? Will he morph his philosophies tomorrow to accommodate a new officer? Will he continue to let his business by dictated by a few emails from pissed off parents (who then turn to the comments at Tyme&#8217;s and drop F bombs like it&#8217;s Hiroshima)?</p>
<p>There are so many conflicts of interest going on at 9rules it&#8217;s amazing. They&#8217;ve pretzeled themselves up nicely; now we can all sit back and watch while they try and unravel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Holst</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/15/9rules-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-86847</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Holst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/15/9rules-wtf/#comment-86847</guid>
		<description>Wow, that idea with Mohammed&#039;s head was funny.

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that idea with Mohammed&#8217;s head was funny.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/15/9rules-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-86812</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/15/9rules-wtf/#comment-86812</guid>
		<description>Jeremy - I don&#039;t think they&#039;ll be kicking out too many more members.  Right now, as far as I can tell, it was only the people associated with Blog Media.  Everyone else gets to stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy &#8211; I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll be kicking out too many more members.  Right now, as far as I can tell, it was only the people associated with Blog Media.  Everyone else gets to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
