<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A question of quality links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dedicated Linux Server</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/comment-page-1/#comment-87198</link>
		<dc:creator>Dedicated Linux Server</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/#comment-87198</guid>
		<description>Those are some good insights- thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are some good insights- thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/comment-page-1/#comment-87141</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/#comment-87141</guid>
		<description>Agree with you Digger, I&#039;d think $3 a day for a relatively new blog (say 2-3 months old) isn&#039;t to bad at all. Indeed I know people who have being blogging for years who would be lucky to break $10. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you Digger, I&#8217;d think $3 a day for a relatively new blog (say 2-3 months old) isn&#8217;t to bad at all. Indeed I know people who have being blogging for years who would be lucky to break $10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digger</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/comment-page-1/#comment-87140</link>
		<dc:creator>Digger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/#comment-87140</guid>
		<description>Yeah $3 a day. Or do you assume that everyone makes $100 a day from their websites?

Just keep in mind that $3 a day and owning 50 sites makes you $150 a day. Not so crappy sounding now is it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah $3 a day. Or do you assume that everyone makes $100 a day from their websites?</p>
<p>Just keep in mind that $3 a day and owning 50 sites makes you $150 a day. Not so crappy sounding now is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/comment-page-1/#comment-87033</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/22/a-question-of-quality-links/#comment-87033</guid>
		<description>$3 a day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$3 a day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

