Apple case against bloggers continues

April 27, 2006 | By Matt Craven | Filed Under General

The Register reports on Apple’s attempts to compel bloggers to reveal their sources for stories related to a future Apple product. The case is currently before a US Court of Appeals.

Under current case law, journalists have wide discretion to protect their sources. This has been challenged in recent years though, at least in the area of criminal cases, by prosecutors using the grand jury as an investigative tool in order to compel journalists to reveal their sources. This was used very successfully in the Valerie Plame investigation by the special prosecutor - though no charges have yet to be filed for the underlying offense in that case.

The case law around bloggers is not quite so clear. The Apple case is important because it will be one of the first major cases that will set the stage for what will come - or not come - in terms of legal protections for bloggers in the future.

For more information on the case and the issues at stake for bloggers, visit the EFF’s excellent summary.


About the author: Matt Craven is the former editor & publisher of The Blog Herald. Currently, Matt is the co-founder of Bryghtpath LLC, a boutique web 2.0 firm located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He blogs at Telegraphik & The Blog Herald. You can follow him on Twitter.



Comments

One Response to “Apple case against bloggers continues”

  1. Chrono Cr@cker on April 28th, 2006 10:14 am

    Blogging too is a media and bloggers are dynamic journalists. Period!

    That’s all the judge needs to say and end the case.

Contributors

Bloggy Award

Latest Reviews

More at Blogosphere News

Submitted News

Our Blog Metrics

Recommended

Splashpress Media

Powered by WordPress | Designed by Brian Gardner
Copyright © 2003 - 2008 by The Blog Herald - All Rights Reserved