Apple case against bloggers continues

Filed as General on April 27, 2006 5:00 am

Repost This

The Register reports on Apple’s attempts to compel bloggers to reveal their sources for stories related to a future Apple product. The case is currently before a US Court of Appeals.

Under current case law, journalists have wide discretion to protect their sources. This has been challenged in recent years though, at least in the area of criminal cases, by prosecutors using the grand jury as an investigative tool in order to compel journalists to reveal their sources. This was used very successfully in the Valerie Plame investigation by the special prosecutor – though no charges have yet to be filed for the underlying offense in that case.

The case law around bloggers is not quite so clear. The Apple case is important because it will be one of the first major cases that will set the stage for what will come – or not come – in terms of legal protections for bloggers in the future.

For more information on the case and the issues at stake for bloggers, visit the EFF’s excellent summary.

This post was written by

You can visit the for a short bio, more posts, and other information about the author.

Submissions & Subscriptions

Submit the post to Reddit, StumbleUpon, Digg or Del.icio.us.

Did you like it? Then subscribe to our RSS feed!



  1. By Chrono Cr@cker posted on April 28, 2006 at 10:14 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Blogging too is a media and bloggers are dynamic journalists. Period!

    That’s all the judge needs to say and end the case.