Web 2.0 pending a trademark

Filed as General on May 26, 2006 9:22 am

by Matt Craven

Apparently, the term “Web 2.0″ now required legal permission to use, at least in some situations, according to a cease & desist letter sent by CMP, representing O’Reilly and others.

I haven’t received a cease & desist letter for using Web 2.0 as a tag, or as a category, or as a term on this blog, but given the penchant for litigation today, I’m sure that’s only a matter of time.

More from Valleywag

This post was written by
Matt Craven

You can visit the Author Archive for a short bio, more posts, and other information about the author.

Random Posts

Submissions & Subscriptions

Submit the post to Reddit, StumbleUpon, Digg, Del.icio.us or Blogosphere News.

Did you like it? Then subscribe to our RSS feed!

  1. By Jessica Doyle posted on May 26, 2006 at 2:09 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I left this comment on the O’Reilly Radar site after reading your entry first.

  2. By Kates posted on May 26, 2006 at 8:20 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    If they want their web2.0 they can have it. Internet doesn’t have version anyway. Oh, somebody is registering web3.0 now.

  3. By Jessica Doyle posted on May 27, 2006 at 6:43 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Sometimes one writes a comment and then posts it only to see what was supposed to be there not be there because of bad markup. I had quoted something but it didn’t show up. My appolgies for leaving a comment here that did not in fact actauly show the comment ;)

    It’s just been one of those days.

  4. Trackback