<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Reilly continues to bungle Web 2.0 trademark issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Klas K.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-96108</link>
		<dc:creator>Klas K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 20:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/#comment-96108</guid>
		<description>Apologies or not, the O&#039;Reilly attitude is not web 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies or not, the O&#8217;Reilly attitude is not web 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam @ Web 2.5 Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-95570</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam @ Web 2.5 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 05:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/#comment-95570</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted a strategy that O&#039;Reilly could have used to remain aligned with their stated principals: &lt;a href=&quot;http://web2dot5.blogspot.com/2006/05/oreilly-get-real.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;O&#039;Reilly, Get Real&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted a strategy that O&#8217;Reilly could have used to remain aligned with their stated principals: <a href="http://web2dot5.blogspot.com/2006/05/oreilly-get-real.html" rel="nofollow">O&#8217;Reilly, Get Real</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rew</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-95108</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 20:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/#comment-95108</guid>
		<description>O&#039;Reilly should know better. Trying to trademark a wildly popular Internet phenomenon, such as Compuserve did with GIF and Amazon.com did with &quot;one-click&quot; shopping, is a Web 1.0 strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;Reilly should know better. Trying to trademark a wildly popular Internet phenomenon, such as Compuserve did with GIF and Amazon.com did with &#8220;one-click&#8221; shopping, is a Web 1.0 strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rew</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-95106</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/#comment-95106</guid>
		<description>O&#039;Reilly should know better. Trying to trademark a wildly popular Internet phenomenon, such as Compuserve did with GIF and Amazon.com did with &quot;one-click&quot; shopping, is a Web 1.0 strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;Reilly should know better. Trying to trademark a wildly popular Internet phenomenon, such as Compuserve did with GIF and Amazon.com did with &#8220;one-click&#8221; shopping, is a Web 1.0 strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery's I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-95046</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery's I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 15:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/05/27/oreilly-continues-to-bungle-web-20-trademark-issue/#comment-95046</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cory Doctorow - O&#8217;Reilly apologist&lt;/strong&gt;

Marc Canter called Cory Doctorow out yesterday. He said:
Cory Doctorow is one of the leading critics of DRMs, DMCA, copyright laws and the status quo - which often pits lawyers vs us.  Heâ€™s worked for the EFF for years and helped found the #1 blog - ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cory Doctorow &#8211; O&#8217;Reilly apologist</strong></p>
<p>Marc Canter called Cory Doctorow out yesterday. He said:<br />
Cory Doctorow is one of the leading critics of DRMs, DMCA, copyright laws and the status quo &#8211; which often pits lawyers vs us.  Heâ€™s worked for the EFF for years and helped found the #1 blog &#8211; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

