The Houston Chronicle takes a well-deserved bow for their Enron trial coverage.
Archives for May 2006
Hot on the heels of our post about the Gunbloggers convention, now the liberal bloggers are having their own gathering in Las Vegas.
Finally upgrading Blog Herald to the current version of WordPress. Watch out for some broken links and errors for the next few hours….
Update:Â 11:28 CST:Â We appear to have completed the upgrade successfully.Â Please post any comments / issues that you see here in this thread, or drop us a note at support [at] blogmedia [dot] biz.
Why do Web 2.0 applications have goofy names? That’s the question that J. Angelo Racoma is asking over at Forever Geek:
Digg, Flickr, Reddit, Meebo, Odeo. What do they all have in common? Well, aside from their being part of all this “Web 2.0” hype (AJAXy-websites, community-driven/oriented content, etc.), they have weird names that seem nonsensical at first glance.
Michael Arrington muses on this Techcrunch post.
Share your OPML is an interesting concept. Upload your OPML file showing all of the feeds that you subscribe to… then use the site to compare to what others are reading, find new feeds, and so on.
The inner geek in me gets a kick out of looking at this site and seeing what others are reading.. but like most geek sites, I see alot of inbreeding going on over there. A-Listers reading A-Listers, and so on.
The real challenge, the one that Arrington talks about in his post, is how to get more folks to ‘Share their OPML’ on the site.
The real question though is will we ever get enough OPMLs on this site to make it a true measurement method.. right now, I don’t trust the metrics at this site.
Google has posted some answers to Frequently-Asked-Questions about their new video ads.
Earlier this week, we enforcing that trademark against a non-profit tradeshow.
O’Reilly has now responded twice to the multitude of bloggers covering this story. In their first post, they apologized for not contacting the non-profit agency in Ireland, but did not back away from using trademark law to “protect” their trademark.
In their second post, O’Reilly’s VP of Communications wrote:
Donagh Kiernan of IT@Cork (to whom the letter was addressed) graciously talked with me late in the work day on a Friday (Irish time), and we’ve resolved the service mark issue. O’Reilly and CMP are fine with IT@Cork using “Web 2.0” in the name of their June 8 conference. And I apologized again to Donagh for the tone of our letter, and for that fact that we didn’t contact IT@Cork before sending it. That’s not the way we want to do business, and as a few of you (OK, more than a few) have noted, it was a mistake.
O’Reilly conference partner John Battelle also responds.
The real issue here isn’t about defending trademarks, I’m all for that. It’s the fact that O’Reilly went out and tried to trademark what I believe we all perceive as a common term – Web 2.0. That’s almost like trademarking the term ‘Blog’ – it shouldn’t be legal.
Wired News carries the story that Apple has lost in their effort to unmask a blogger’s sources after two bloggers posted images and other material disclosing a future Apple product known as ‘Asteroid’.
Attorney Denise Howell is all over the story along with detailed analysis at Bag & Baggage:
Online journalists are entitled to the conditional privilege arising from consitutional guarantees of a free press. Divulging confidential sources can only be compelled when there is a “need sufficient to overbalance the inhibitory effect of such disclosure upon the free flow of ideas and information which is the core object of our guarantees of free speech and press.” The petitioners are entitled to the privilege, and Apple failed to show a need sufficient to overcome it.
Howell also notes that this is a “very tech-savvy opinion”, as well.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation also has coverage at their Apple v Does website.