<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining Blog Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-102224</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 04:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-102224</guid>
		<description>I prefer to think myself as a &quot;Network of Blogs&quot; instead of a &quot;Blog Network&quot; ... and I&#039;ve given up trying to ask Matt to modify my H-E.N. over at B.N.L. .. You can delete me, or not. It&#039;s my summer and fall project, although nothing much happening now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to think myself as a &#8220;Network of Blogs&#8221; instead of a &#8220;Blog Network&#8221; &#8230; and I&#8217;ve given up trying to ask Matt to modify my H-E.N. over at B.N.L. .. You can delete me, or not. It&#8217;s my summer and fall project, although nothing much happening now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wolff</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-102163</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-102163</guid>
		<description>Call them ad networks, not blog networks. Lots of people belong to networks of blogs without advertising as the common thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call them ad networks, not blog networks. Lots of people belong to networks of blogs without advertising as the common thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Berlin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-102095</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 06:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-102095</guid>
		<description>Interesting discusion. At Blogcritics.org, we consider ourselves an online magazine and online media source of more than 1,400 bloggers. 

I think the fundamental reason why bloggers form and then join some sort of larger group or organization of blogs is because there is some sort of value proposition involved: the larger group gains in value with each added member, and presumably the blogger gets something in return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discusion. At Blogcritics.org, we consider ourselves an online magazine and online media source of more than 1,400 bloggers. </p>
<p>I think the fundamental reason why bloggers form and then join some sort of larger group or organization of blogs is because there is some sort of value proposition involved: the larger group gains in value with each added member, and presumably the blogger gets something in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rundle</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-102068</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 23:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-102068</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;The reality is that 9rules is fundamentally a community - but itâ€™s also a blog network - the semantics donâ€™t really matter to me.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Matt, you&#039;ve got it exactly right.

We might use the term &quot;blog network&quot; in our About text just because (right now at least) it&#039;s the easiest way to explain what 9rules is, but that doesn&#039;t mean we own blogs and pay authors like other blog networks do.  We work on a very different model, and although we have many blogs that are members of 9rules (just like other networks have many authors that are members/part of their respective networks), the method by which we provide value is very different.

To break it down to basic terms, our job as a network is to provide a ton of centralized value and interactivity on our own website, so more readers come in and check out our members, which drives traffic outwards to their sites.  The more centralized value we provide, the more traffic/recognition goes out to our members, which in-turn makes them happier with their 9rules affiliation.  This flow means that 9rules.com has to be &quot;the place to be&quot; in order to get more recognition for our members, so that&#039;s what we concentrate on.  It&#039;s a bit different than the typical blog network model (where each individual site is supposed to reroute traffic to the other sites) but this works for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;The reality is that 9rules is fundamentally a community &#8211; but itâ€™s also a blog network &#8211; the semantics donâ€™t really matter to me.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Matt, you&#8217;ve got it exactly right.</p>
<p>We might use the term &#8220;blog network&#8221; in our About text just because (right now at least) it&#8217;s the easiest way to explain what 9rules is, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we own blogs and pay authors like other blog networks do.  We work on a very different model, and although we have many blogs that are members of 9rules (just like other networks have many authors that are members/part of their respective networks), the method by which we provide value is very different.</p>
<p>To break it down to basic terms, our job as a network is to provide a ton of centralized value and interactivity on our own website, so more readers come in and check out our members, which drives traffic outwards to their sites.  The more centralized value we provide, the more traffic/recognition goes out to our members, which in-turn makes them happier with their 9rules affiliation.  This flow means that 9rules.com has to be &#8220;the place to be&#8221; in order to get more recognition for our members, so that&#8217;s what we concentrate on.  It&#8217;s a bit different than the typical blog network model (where each individual site is supposed to reroute traffic to the other sites) but this works for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-102007</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 14:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-102007</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get too caught up in the whole Blog Network debate on what is and isn&#039;t a network.  I used to - now it doesn&#039;t matter so much to me.

I do think that advertising networks like Federated Media aren&#039;t blog networks - they&#039;re advertising networks.  And thus we&#039;ll be removing them from Blog Network List at some point.

There are also large communities - like livejournal and others that aren&#039;t blog networks - though some of the owners of those communities have wanted to be a part of Blog Network List  - we&#039;ve resisted those movements.

The reality is that 9rules is fundamentally a community - but it&#039;s also a blog network - the semantics don&#039;t really matter to me.  They&#039;ll stay in BNL until someone convinces me that they dont&#039; belong - and I don&#039;t see that happening :)

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get too caught up in the whole Blog Network debate on what is and isn&#8217;t a network.  I used to &#8211; now it doesn&#8217;t matter so much to me.</p>
<p>I do think that advertising networks like Federated Media aren&#8217;t blog networks &#8211; they&#8217;re advertising networks.  And thus we&#8217;ll be removing them from Blog Network List at some point.</p>
<p>There are also large communities &#8211; like livejournal and others that aren&#8217;t blog networks &#8211; though some of the owners of those communities have wanted to be a part of Blog Network List  &#8211; we&#8217;ve resisted those movements.</p>
<p>The reality is that 9rules is fundamentally a community &#8211; but it&#8217;s also a blog network &#8211; the semantics don&#8217;t really matter to me.  They&#8217;ll stay in BNL until someone convinces me that they dont&#8217; belong &#8211; and I don&#8217;t see that happening :)</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans (SYNTAGMA)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-101952</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans (SYNTAGMA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 08:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-101952</guid>
		<description>Why is everyone creating &quot;blog networks&quot;? Because WIN showed you could make millions out of them. So, in the sense we&#039;re talking about networks here, they are clusters of blogs, usually under single ownership, whether individual or corporate, whose sole aim is to accumulate value in permalinks and search for sale further down the line.

Let&#039;s not beat about the bush. We&#039;re talking &quot;real&quot; estate here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone creating &#8220;blog networks&#8221;? Because WIN showed you could make millions out of them. So, in the sense we&#8217;re talking about networks here, they are clusters of blogs, usually under single ownership, whether individual or corporate, whose sole aim is to accumulate value in permalinks and search for sale further down the line.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not beat about the bush. We&#8217;re talking &#8220;real&#8221; estate here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-101924</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-101924</guid>
		<description>Just a second - did I miss something.....?

Last I hear 9rules were calling themselves a blog network..... and from memory there was quite a bit of energetic &#039;discussion&#039; about it.

Their about page says - &#039;The 9rules Network is a community of the best weblogs in the world on a variety of topics.&#039;

Seems they do see themselves as a network in most of their pages....

Or have they changed the way they describe themselves.

To be honest - it doesn&#039;t bother me either way what they&#039;re called. They are one of many ways that the blogosphere is currently organising itself (something that happens in any movement throughout history).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a second &#8211; did I miss something&#8230;..?</p>
<p>Last I hear 9rules were calling themselves a blog network&#8230;.. and from memory there was quite a bit of energetic &#8216;discussion&#8217; about it.</p>
<p>Their about page says &#8211; &#8216;The 9rules Network is a community of the best weblogs in the world on a variety of topics.&#8217;</p>
<p>Seems they do see themselves as a network in most of their pages&#8230;.</p>
<p>Or have they changed the way they describe themselves.</p>
<p>To be honest &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t bother me either way what they&#8217;re called. They are one of many ways that the blogosphere is currently organising itself (something that happens in any movement throughout history).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-101748</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-101748</guid>
		<description>Cary
there is an alternative: they&#039;re called blog rings :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cary<br />
there is an alternative: they&#8217;re called blog rings :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-101343</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-101343</guid>
		<description>I mean, I would NOT call SM a rose of a network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, I would NOT call SM a rose of a network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-101227</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-101227</guid>
		<description>I would call SM a rose of a network, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would call SM a rose of a network, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-101204</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 16:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-101204</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad someone is talking about this, as it&#039;s become one of my most annoying pet-peeves â€“â€“ the idea that a Blog Network is only a Blog Network if there&#039;s money or ownership involved is absurd.

Sorry guys, the term &quot;Network&quot; isn&#039;t exclusive to commerce. Any group of like-minded, connected people â€“ be they bloggers, artists, patient advocates or anyone else â€“ can be a &quot;Network.&quot;

Perhaps it&#039;s time to come up with an entirely different term for networks of bloggers who are trying to make money â€“ the world of blogging is much bigger than commerce, and Blog Networks are much bigger than all the Gawkers, b5s and WIN/AOLs combined.

Ok, coming down off my soapbox now ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad someone is talking about this, as it&#8217;s become one of my most annoying pet-peeves â€“â€“ the idea that a Blog Network is only a Blog Network if there&#8217;s money or ownership involved is absurd.</p>
<p>Sorry guys, the term &#8220;Network&#8221; isn&#8217;t exclusive to commerce. Any group of like-minded, connected people â€“ be they bloggers, artists, patient advocates or anyone else â€“ can be a &#8220;Network.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s time to come up with an entirely different term for networks of bloggers who are trying to make money â€“ the world of blogging is much bigger than commerce, and Blog Networks are much bigger than all the Gawkers, b5s and WIN/AOLs combined.</p>
<p>Ok, coming down off my soapbox now ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans (SYNTAGMA)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-101199</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans (SYNTAGMA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 16:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/07/03/defining-blog-networks/#comment-101199</guid>
		<description>As Shakespeare allegedly write, Aaron, &quot;A rose is still a rose by any other name&quot;. We get too caught up with names which are human inventions. A true rose, such as Syntagma Media, goes way beyond the human sphere. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Shakespeare allegedly write, Aaron, &#8220;A rose is still a rose by any other name&#8221;. We get too caught up with names which are human inventions. A true rose, such as Syntagma Media, goes way beyond the human sphere. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

