<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liveblogging: Blogging and Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/08/05/liveblogging-blogging-and-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/08/05/liveblogging-blogging-and-journalism/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: nhantran.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Blog Editing Process</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/08/05/liveblogging-blogging-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-109605</link>
		<dc:creator>nhantran.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Blog Editing Process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/08/05/liveblogging-blogging-and-journalism/#comment-109605</guid>
		<description>[...] The Blog Herald posted a random quote from Wordcamp which I find a bit too simplistic: If you can write something in 1000 words, why write it in 2000? If you can write it in 1000 words, you can write it in 500 words. If you can write it in 500 words, you can write it in 200 words. Those 200 words have to be the best quality words that convey the message. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Blog Herald posted a random quote from Wordcamp which I find a bit too simplistic: If you can write something in 1000 words, why write it in 2000? If you can write it in 1000 words, you can write it in 500 words. If you can write it in 500 words, you can write it in 200 words. Those 200 words have to be the best quality words that convey the message. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blog Editing Process by Elliott Back</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/08/05/liveblogging-blogging-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-108962</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blog Editing Process by Elliott Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 07:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/08/05/liveblogging-blogging-and-journalism/#comment-108962</guid>
		<description>[...] The Blog Herald posted a random quote from Wordcamp which I find a bit too simplistic:     If you can write something in 1000 words, why write it in 2000? If you can write it in 1000 words, you can write it in 500 words. If you can write it in 500 words, you can write it in 200 words. Those 200 words have to be the best quality words that convey the message. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Blog Herald posted a random quote from Wordcamp which I find a bit too simplistic:     If you can write something in 1000 words, why write it in 2000? If you can write it in 1000 words, you can write it in 500 words. If you can write it in 500 words, you can write it in 200 words. Those 200 words have to be the best quality words that convey the message. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

