http://karmaweb.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/identity-in-the-blogosphere/

I take the majority of survey results with a grain of salt – some more than others.

You make two statements that are baffling:

“Google is the new source for information.”

What? A new source of information. I think of them as a search engine.

“Businesses are embracing blogs like the websites of the 90’s. That’s not really cheerleading its just fact.”

What are the websites of the 90s? Businesses are embracing blogs, as well they should be. But “business blogs” are still a niche. You still have an entire population of people over 50 who rarely use computers.

Honestly, I really think it might be worth my while to conduct an actual national survey considering this whole matter. My contention is that less than 10% of people are heavily influenced by blogs when making a purchasing decision.

And if anyone actually believes that a political blog can “change someone’s mind” about politics, I think they’re kidding.

“Blogging is a niche practice.”

Huh? In 2002, Technorati was tracking blogs in the thousands. Today over 54 million. I don’t possibly see “niche” anywhere in that scenario. Even if you argue that 50% of those tracked are splogs or abondoned sites, in my short experience with Blogs vs. Websites, most of the people that are reading blogs don’t know they are. They believe a blog is actually a website. If you asked how many people use the Internet as their source for information and were influenced by it, they could be reading nothing but blogs and not know it. I would venture if the verbage of the question was changed to that it would be a much higher percentage. When was the last time you searched through the yellow pages to find out about the best tech gadget? Google is the new source for information.
Businesses are embracing blogs like the websites of the 90′s. That’s not really cheerleading its just fact.

Ask 20 people you know how influenced they are by blogs. Then write down the answer and report back to me :)

The average person doesn’t even read blogs, let alone be influenced by them. Blogging is a niche practice.

Martin: Thanks for your uniquely calm comment. ;-)

Thord: Blogs are about exchanges of information on the raw and cutting edges. The raw edge is where there’s controversy or avant-guarde thinking in politics. The cutting edge is where there’s innovation in tech and new media.

Blogs are not good for ad-based commercial publishing. The people who matter don’t see them that way — and they are the buyers.

My point is that when blogs are networked as content providers they are mimicking print magazines (whether they know it or not) and straying beyond their point of maximum effectiveness. Unless, that is, they go the whole hog and badge themselves as a magazine, and bring in the production values of the print serial industry. Then they can approach the kind of advertisers who dominate printed magazines.

Blog networks that don’t make this transition remain as awkward hybrids unless they go for a specific tech audience, as WIN did. Our stretching of the envelope is actually just recognizing reality.

I too think the numbers is overwhelming and you can make what you will of it – but it’s actual research done by actual research companies. You can’t ignore it just because it doesn’t fit your world view.

As for cheerleading, you should see my pom-poms! They are pitch black!

John,

Thanks for the reply, and I hear you but don’t agree with “there’s a difference between reading (and being influenced by) blogs and actually buying products and services from them”. If you can take advice from a blog where to spend your hard earned cash you sure can buy from it as well – I think it’s a matter of trust and the advice part sure shows that it’s there. The trust, that is.

That being said I realize that retail businesses with the “wrong” person can have a problem with the concept of a blog network. It isn’t as easy to grasp as just “network” – attaching “magazine” to it could just as well be something else. Like site. ;)

I do totally agree on you on one point though! Small networks have to specialize. Expand when you can, but make sure you get your niche and do it good. Regular readers of my blog knows I’m a strong believer in this.

Doesn’t it ever get old to be a blog cheerleader? :)

As a small B**g N*****k :-) Syntagma has to aim at a segment of the market to make an impact. We have to specialize. It’s the choice you have to make when you go from monetized blog to real business.

We’ve decided to go towards (probably) the biggest business on earth: retail. Although blogs can make an impact in this area, the bigcos have yet to move in because the inventory is split three ways : kids gabbling, tech and politicos gabbling.

So we’ve positioned ourselves with high-end content, in an increasingly magazine format — which retailers understand — and with a non-controversial ethos. This is purely a business choice and not a knockback to the blogosphere, whose games I’ve enjoyed playing.

We’re transforming ourselves slowly, because, like most Web businesses there are very few of us. If current negotiations to get a retail consultancy onboard succeed, things will move very fast indeed.

I hope that answers your questions.