<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we about to see Blog Networks 2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Blog Networks 2.0?&#160;by&#160;Blogging Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/comment-page-1/#comment-128667</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Blog Networks 2.0?&#160;by&#160;Blogging Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/#comment-128667</guid>
		<description>[...] via Blog Herald   Tags: instablogs, &quot;blogs, 2.0&quot;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Blog Herald   Tags: instablogs, &#8220;blogs, 2.0&#8243;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankit</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/comment-page-1/#comment-128542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/#comment-128542</guid>
		<description>Thanks Martin, 
Instablogs Community is working great, though we have a very small group right now. But our beta testers are helping us to sort out many things, and most importantly they are helping us in preparing the help files.  

We have completed the app in a very short time, so there is ongoing development everyday. We would be inviting few hundred people more by next week. 

&gt;&gt;But it may lose readership if it gets over-technical.
Yes John, thats true, few of our beta testers have complained about the same.  This is always a big challenge for any programmer to keep things really simple, and yet powerful. We have skip many features from our first version, like Conversation tracker, importing own feeds  to keep this version as lite as poosible.  Anyways we have put up a quick tour online - 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.instablogs.com/tour/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.instablogs.com/tour/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Martin,<br />
Instablogs Community is working great, though we have a very small group right now. But our beta testers are helping us to sort out many things, and most importantly they are helping us in preparing the help files.  </p>
<p>We have completed the app in a very short time, so there is ongoing development everyday. We would be inviting few hundred people more by next week. </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;But it may lose readership if it gets over-technical.<br />
Yes John, thats true, few of our beta testers have complained about the same.  This is always a big challenge for any programmer to keep things really simple, and yet powerful. We have skip many features from our first version, like Conversation tracker, importing own feeds  to keep this version as lite as poosible.  Anyways we have put up a quick tour online &#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.instablogs.com/tour/" rel="nofollow">http://www.instablogs.com/tour/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/comment-page-1/#comment-128517</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/#comment-128517</guid>
		<description>Look for instablogs to become much more involved with utilizing video on their sites as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look for instablogs to become much more involved with utilizing video on their sites as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starked SF, Unforgiving News from the Bay &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town: Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/comment-page-1/#comment-128490</link>
		<dc:creator>Starked SF, Unforgiving News from the Bay &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town: Thursday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/#comment-128490</guid>
		<description>[...] BlogHerald: Blog Networks 2.0? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BlogHerald: Blog Networks 2.0? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John (Syn.....)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/comment-page-1/#comment-128481</link>
		<dc:creator>John (Syn.....)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/#comment-128481</guid>
		<description>This is very close to what we&#039;re doing over at Syn..... Just substitute &quot;network magazines&quot; for Anit&#039;s &quot;tribal&quot; approach to the inventory and bingo.

If all the technology works -- and readers understand it -- it should be worth watching. But it may lose readership if it gets over-technical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very close to what we&#8217;re doing over at Syn&#8230;.. Just substitute &#8220;network magazines&#8221; for Anit&#8217;s &#8220;tribal&#8221; approach to the inventory and bingo.</p>
<p>If all the technology works &#8212; and readers understand it &#8212; it should be worth watching. But it may lose readership if it gets over-technical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franky</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/comment-page-1/#comment-128463</link>
		<dc:creator>franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/18/are-we-about-to-see-blog-networks-20/#comment-128463</guid>
		<description>I am already looking forward to Blog Networks 3.0. Where the readers get paid to read the blogs. I already proposed Calacanis to pay me to vote at Netscape, but I guess he doesn&#039;t want me to drive a Porsche or even to have 2-ply toilet paper at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am already looking forward to Blog Networks 3.0. Where the readers get paid to read the blogs. I already proposed Calacanis to pay me to vote at Netscape, but I guess he doesn&#8217;t want me to drive a Porsche or even to have 2-ply toilet paper at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

