<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ClickFraud Under the Spotlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/22/clickfraud-under-the-spotlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/22/clickfraud-under-the-spotlight/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; The Sunday Sermon: Google Just As Guilty as PayPerPost, Edelman, in Polluting Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/22/clickfraud-under-the-spotlight/comment-page-1/#comment-128915</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; The Sunday Sermon: Google Just As Guilty as PayPerPost, Edelman, in Polluting Blogosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/22/clickfraud-under-the-spotlight/#comment-128915</guid>
		<description>[...] [NOTE: I blogged about this over at BlogHerald, where I asked &#8220;When will Wall Street take notice of a company, where up to 30% of their revenue might be fraudulent?&#8221;] I saw &#8220;wonderful&#8221;, because I think its great when off-line media begin to notice the shennanigans of on-line hi-jinks. It brings more discussion into the fold, and really puts forces people to start asking good questions about company practices. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [NOTE: I blogged about this over at BlogHerald, where I asked &#8220;When will Wall Street take notice of a company, where up to 30% of their revenue might be fraudulent?&#8221;] I saw &#8220;wonderful&#8221;, because I think its great when off-line media begin to notice the shennanigans of on-line hi-jinks. It brings more discussion into the fold, and really puts forces people to start asking good questions about company practices. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

