<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will You Take the Blog Honor Pledge?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Your Blog Need a Disclaimer? : The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-216519</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Your Blog Need a Disclaimer? : The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-216519</guid>
		<description>[...] of you have heard of disclosures, legal statements that disclose the fact that you are blogging to make money, and being paid to blog. What about disclaimers? Should your blog have a disclaimer? Does it need [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of you have heard of disclosures, legal statements that disclose the fact that you are blogging to make money, and being paid to blog. What about disclaimers? Should your blog have a disclaimer? Does it need [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grokodile</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-130383</link>
		<dc:creator>Grokodile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-130383</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too late.  The quality of content on many portions of the net is already crappy, this will just incentivize more crappy quality content.

Quality and &quot;getting noticed&quot; are going to be the name of the game.  Have something good (which won&#039;t be paid posts) and then find a way to get it in front of people so you can develop an audience.

I don&#039;t think anything will change... look at all the spammy blogs that are out there posting nothing original at all right now... what will a few million more crappy blogs matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too late.  The quality of content on many portions of the net is already crappy, this will just incentivize more crappy quality content.</p>
<p>Quality and &#8220;getting noticed&#8221; are going to be the name of the game.  Have something good (which won&#8217;t be paid posts) and then find a way to get it in front of people so you can develop an audience.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anything will change&#8230; look at all the spammy blogs that are out there posting nothing original at all right now&#8230; what will a few million more crappy blogs matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isolationism &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Honour Pledge Redux</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-130257</link>
		<dc:creator>Isolationism &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Honour Pledge Redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 05:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-130257</guid>
		<description>[...] A good friend of mine (with apparently better eyesight than my own) over at Push the Third Button Twice made a recent editorial post about a new trend against, in the Blog Herald&#8217;s own words, &#8220;blogging for money,&#8221; which I think should be rewritten to &#8220;knowingly blogging biased content for financial gain&#8221; (but then I should talk because the Blog Herald is obviously a way more successful blog than mine. I wasn&#8217;t even thinking of the word &#8220;sensationalism,&#8221; why do you mention it?). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A good friend of mine (with apparently better eyesight than my own) over at Push the Third Button Twice made a recent editorial post about a new trend against, in the Blog Herald&#8217;s own words, &#8220;blogging for money,&#8221; which I think should be rewritten to &#8220;knowingly blogging biased content for financial gain&#8221; (but then I should talk because the Blog Herald is obviously a way more successful blog than mine. I wasn&#8217;t even thinking of the word &#8220;sensationalism,&#8221; why do you mention it?). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Carlson</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129551</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 04:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129551</guid>
		<description>As long as there&#039;s full disclosure, the rest will take care of itself.  If I know right off whether I&#039;m reading a person&#039;s own words or those they&#039;re being paid/influenced to write, I can decide for myself whether or not I want to read it.  Sorry, DrumsNWhistles, but motivation is a factor in my trusting a site.

I think there&#039;s enough bandwidth to allow both paid and uncompensated blogs.  As long as we know which is which, we can surf intelligently.  One thought I have about being paid to blog; your content had better be accurate, complete and informed.  There&#039;s too much free, quality content out there I can access.  Your metrics won&#039;t be worth a buck if you don&#039;t deliver something different and interesting.  

If all you do is AdSense, I don&#039;t even consider that payment.  It&#039;s passive and obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as there&#8217;s full disclosure, the rest will take care of itself.  If I know right off whether I&#8217;m reading a person&#8217;s own words or those they&#8217;re being paid/influenced to write, I can decide for myself whether or not I want to read it.  Sorry, DrumsNWhistles, but motivation is a factor in my trusting a site.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s enough bandwidth to allow both paid and uncompensated blogs.  As long as we know which is which, we can surf intelligently.  One thought I have about being paid to blog; your content had better be accurate, complete and informed.  There&#8217;s too much free, quality content out there I can access.  Your metrics won&#8217;t be worth a buck if you don&#8217;t deliver something different and interesting.  </p>
<p>If all you do is AdSense, I don&#8217;t even consider that payment.  It&#8217;s passive and obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where&#8217;s Jason Calacanis when you need him? at odd time signatures</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129511</link>
		<dc:creator>Where&#8217;s Jason Calacanis when you need him? at odd time signatures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129511</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Perhaps Mr. Mueller should take the Blog Honor Pledge. Or maybe the Washington Post. Or both. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Perhaps Mr. Mueller should take the Blog Honor Pledge. Or maybe the Washington Post. Or both. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrumsNWhistles</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129481</link>
		<dc:creator>DrumsNWhistles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129481</guid>
		<description>I think the ratio for me of PPP postings to normal posts is something like 1 paid for every ten not.

My sister in law came over a couple of months ago in her new Prius.  We have one now, too.  Oh, and I bought some Moo cards for my drummer son because I saw some really cool ones on Flickr because of their free giveaway awhile back.  And I actually watch commercial TV.

Before I bought my last laptop I read through lots of blogs to see which ones seemed to be ones bloggers liked best.

It wouldn&#039;t matter to me whether any of the recommendations I used were paid or not as long as I trusted the person who wrote them to be honest about the product, which I did in these cases.

No one steered me wrong -- I got exactly what I expected.  I don&#039;t view that as a bad thing.  

Part of what has me defending PPP is this misconception that the ones paid to post  are spam-mongers.  At three non-consecutive posts per day (I usually do one about every three days), this is not a spamblog factory, crusading to further pollute the blogosphere with meaningless tripe.

DnW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the ratio for me of PPP postings to normal posts is something like 1 paid for every ten not.</p>
<p>My sister in law came over a couple of months ago in her new Prius.  We have one now, too.  Oh, and I bought some Moo cards for my drummer son because I saw some really cool ones on Flickr because of their free giveaway awhile back.  And I actually watch commercial TV.</p>
<p>Before I bought my last laptop I read through lots of blogs to see which ones seemed to be ones bloggers liked best.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t matter to me whether any of the recommendations I used were paid or not as long as I trusted the person who wrote them to be honest about the product, which I did in these cases.</p>
<p>No one steered me wrong &#8212; I got exactly what I expected.  I don&#8217;t view that as a bad thing.  </p>
<p>Part of what has me defending PPP is this misconception that the ones paid to post  are spam-mongers.  At three non-consecutive posts per day (I usually do one about every three days), this is not a spamblog factory, crusading to further pollute the blogosphere with meaningless tripe.</p>
<p>DnW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kukral</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129473</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kukral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129473</guid>
		<description>Vincent, I think you&#039;re missing the point of the first part of the pledge, and that is that as a blogger I&#039;m pledging my honor to you for your trust, so therefore telling your reader that you&#039;re going to &quot;always put out good content&quot; is needed. I don&#039;t see anything wrong with that. I mean, are you sometimes going to put out shit content? That&#039;s ok?

Drums... Most disclose eh? Those are blogs I&#039;ll never, ever read. Do you keep going to your friends house if everytime you go over they keep putting on the sales pitch for tupperware or candles? I sure as heck don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent, I think you&#8217;re missing the point of the first part of the pledge, and that is that as a blogger I&#8217;m pledging my honor to you for your trust, so therefore telling your reader that you&#8217;re going to &#8220;always put out good content&#8221; is needed. I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with that. I mean, are you sometimes going to put out shit content? That&#8217;s ok?</p>
<p>Drums&#8230; Most disclose eh? Those are blogs I&#8217;ll never, ever read. Do you keep going to your friends house if everytime you go over they keep putting on the sales pitch for tupperware or candles? I sure as heck don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starked SF, Unforgiving News from the Bay &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town: Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129462</link>
		<dc:creator>Starked SF, Unforgiving News from the Bay &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town: Thursday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129462</guid>
		<description>[...] The blog honor pledge. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The blog honor pledge. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VC Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129461</link>
		<dc:creator>VC Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129461</guid>
		<description>Martin, This is written to sound honorable, but looks amazingly open-ended.  Are we playing word games here or does this have any teeth?  As a PPP investor, I&#039;m confused whether this pledge says a blogger/videographer/podcaster/photographer can participate in PPP with disclosure.  I&#039;m also not sure what kind of disclosure is mandated (cash, non-cash, exclusives, in-line, sidebar, about page).  What is your interpretation?

I&#039;m working on a disclosure policy for my blog because this doesn&#039;t feel like a one-size-fits-all problem.  I&#039;d appreciate your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, This is written to sound honorable, but looks amazingly open-ended.  Are we playing word games here or does this have any teeth?  As a PPP investor, I&#8217;m confused whether this pledge says a blogger/videographer/podcaster/photographer can participate in PPP with disclosure.  I&#8217;m also not sure what kind of disclosure is mandated (cash, non-cash, exclusives, in-line, sidebar, about page).  What is your interpretation?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on a disclosure policy for my blog because this doesn&#8217;t feel like a one-size-fits-all problem.  I&#8217;d appreciate your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darrenh</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129451</link>
		<dc:creator>darrenh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129451</guid>
		<description>This is actually something we can learn from dead tree media. Advertising looks like the way to generate revenue from a blog. But content and advertising must be distinct. And if you believe in quality and integrity, you won&#039;t let the desire to cozy up with your advertisers drive your content. Being true to the reader is the basis of it all. You won&#039;t build an audience by shilling for someone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually something we can learn from dead tree media. Advertising looks like the way to generate revenue from a blog. But content and advertising must be distinct. And if you believe in quality and integrity, you won&#8217;t let the desire to cozy up with your advertisers drive your content. Being true to the reader is the basis of it all. You won&#8217;t build an audience by shilling for someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129448</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129448</guid>
		<description>Just say &quot;NO&quot; to linkbait initiatives :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just say &#8220;NO&#8221; to linkbait initiatives :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrumsNWhistles</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129439</link>
		<dc:creator>DrumsNWhistles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129439</guid>
		<description>Many who write for PayPerPost disclose.  You can find my full statement of principles on this question &lt;a href=&quot;http://drumsnwhistles.com/blog-principles&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m one step ahead of you, as are most of the folks writing for PPP.  

DnW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many who write for PayPerPost disclose.  You can find my full statement of principles on this question <a href="http://drumsnwhistles.com/blog-principles" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m one step ahead of you, as are most of the folks writing for PPP.  </p>
<p>DnW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog News Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pledge for Blog Honor</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129436</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog News Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pledge for Blog Honor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129436</guid>
		<description>[...] Thatâ€™s why itâ€™s about time people like Jim Kukral, publisher of ReveNews.com and founder of the BlogKits Affiliate Marketing Blogging Network recently started Blog Honor Pledge. The principles are very straight forward. Even Blog Heraldâ€™s famous Martin Neumann expressed similar sort of view. I know a lot of top blogger will take the Pledge, since itâ€™s about saving the very thing that can save blogosphere. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thatâ€™s why itâ€™s about time people like Jim Kukral, publisher of ReveNews.com and founder of the BlogKits Affiliate Marketing Blogging Network recently started Blog Honor Pledge. The principles are very straight forward. Even Blog Heraldâ€™s famous Martin Neumann expressed similar sort of view. I know a lot of top blogger will take the Pledge, since itâ€™s about saving the very thing that can save blogosphere. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamrul Hassan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129432</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamrul Hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129432</guid>
		<description>I take pledge. No matter what I will write, how ugly stuff but readers have rights to know my intention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take pledge. No matter what I will write, how ugly stuff but readers have rights to know my intention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gleb</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129430</link>
		<dc:creator>Gleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129430</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you. There is nothing wrong with a clearly distinct advertisement, but I would not intentionally mislead my readers by advertising some product I wouldn&#039;t personally like and approve.

Blog honor pledge seems like a decent thing to do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you. There is nothing wrong with a clearly distinct advertisement, but I would not intentionally mislead my readers by advertising some product I wouldn&#8217;t personally like and approve.</p>
<p>Blog honor pledge seems like a decent thing to do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zero Boss</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129396</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zero Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129396</guid>
		<description>Cool beans. Agreed 100%. I HATE this effort to buy buzz within the blog community.

it&#039;s quite an impassioned issue, though. A post I wrote on it several weeks back is still generating debate from PayPerPosters defending the model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool beans. Agreed 100%. I HATE this effort to buy buzz within the blog community.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s quite an impassioned issue, though. A post I wrote on it several weeks back is still generating debate from PayPerPosters defending the model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129390</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129390</guid>
		<description>Oh and another thing.  You have two mistakes in paragraph two: &quot;has&quot; instead of &quot;have&quot; and &quot;it&#039;s&quot; instead of &quot;it is&quot;.  I am going to have to take away your blog honor badge.  Hand it over.  I don&#039;t want this to get ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and another thing.  You have two mistakes in paragraph two: &#8220;has&#8221; instead of &#8220;have&#8221; and &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; instead of &#8220;it is&#8221;.  I am going to have to take away your blog honor badge.  Hand it over.  I don&#8217;t want this to get ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-129389</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/10/25/will-you-take-the-blog-honor-pledge/#comment-129389</guid>
		<description>The blog honor pledge is not straight forward.  The first pledge is kind of stupid: &quot;1. I will endeavor to continue to bring you the highest quality content that I am capable of&quot;.  Does this mean you have to spend a week on each post to achieve the highest level of quality you are capable of?  Or maybe fifty years.  Or maybe you should spend a lifetime on your first post and submit it on your deathbed when there is no physical way you could make it better.

If the pledge is about authenticity and transparency then they should remove the &quot;how long is a piece of string&quot; quality bit and keep the other two.  After all quality is subjective and not really necessary.  There are plenty of successful and authentic blogs out there that are low quality in terms of badly grammar and aweful spelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blog honor pledge is not straight forward.  The first pledge is kind of stupid: &#8220;1. I will endeavor to continue to bring you the highest quality content that I am capable of&#8221;.  Does this mean you have to spend a week on each post to achieve the highest level of quality you are capable of?  Or maybe fifty years.  Or maybe you should spend a lifetime on your first post and submit it on your deathbed when there is no physical way you could make it better.</p>
<p>If the pledge is about authenticity and transparency then they should remove the &#8220;how long is a piece of string&#8221; quality bit and keep the other two.  After all quality is subjective and not really necessary.  There are plenty of successful and authentic blogs out there that are low quality in terms of badly grammar and aweful spelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

