<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Opinion on Mike&#8217;s TechCrunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; UPDATE: Arrington&#8217;s Umbrage Continued &#8212; What MothersClick&#8217;s PR Firm Told Them NOT To Do</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/comment-page-1/#comment-130447</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; UPDATE: Arrington&#8217;s Umbrage Continued &#8212; What MothersClick&#8217;s PR Firm Told Them NOT To Do</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/#comment-130447</guid>
		<description>[...] The issue around Mike Arrington&#8217;s latest rant has drawn its share of controversy from both sides; some saying that Mr. Arrington is far too arbitrary bordering on elitest, while others congratulate him on the work he&#8217;s done, arguing that he can do damn well as he pleases. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The issue around Mike Arrington&#8217;s latest rant has drawn its share of controversy from both sides; some saying that Mr. Arrington is far too arbitrary bordering on elitest, while others congratulate him on the work he&#8217;s done, arguing that he can do damn well as he pleases. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/comment-page-1/#comment-130403</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/#comment-130403</guid>
		<description>Fuck the haters - that&#039;s my feedback on this.
The guy has created something (a BIG something) from nothing.

So screw them.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck the haters &#8211; that&#8217;s my feedback on this.<br />
The guy has created something (a BIG something) from nothing.</p>
<p>So screw them.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/comment-page-1/#comment-130402</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/#comment-130402</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sorry itâ€™s offtopic, I read your blog on Bloglines and offlate noticed that most of the time your past articles also appear along with updated/new ones and I can say thatâ€™s pretty annoying. Pl see into that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is a bloglines problem.  Our feed is not being modified.

~matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sorry itâ€™s offtopic, I read your blog on Bloglines and offlate noticed that most of the time your past articles also appear along with updated/new ones and I can say thatâ€™s pretty annoying. Pl see into that.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a bloglines problem.  Our feed is not being modified.</p>
<p>~matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrumsNWhistles</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/comment-page-1/#comment-130391</link>
		<dc:creator>DrumsNWhistles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/#comment-130391</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;d agree with you wholeheartedly if he didn&#039;t criticize others who wield far less power about the same issues.

Is it that he&#039;s allowed to be critical because he has the power, or should he be held to the same standard that he&#039;s holding us to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;d agree with you wholeheartedly if he didn&#8217;t criticize others who wield far less power about the same issues.</p>
<p>Is it that he&#8217;s allowed to be critical because he has the power, or should he be held to the same standard that he&#8217;s holding us to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debashish</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/comment-page-1/#comment-130343</link>
		<dc:creator>debashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/02/another-opinion-on-mikes-techcrunch/#comment-130343</guid>
		<description>Sorry it&#039;s offtopic, I read your blog on Bloglines and offlate noticed that most of the time your past articles also appear along with updated/new ones and I can say that&#039;s pretty annoying. Pl see into that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry it&#8217;s offtopic, I read your blog on Bloglines and offlate noticed that most of the time your past articles also appear along with updated/new ones and I can say that&#8217;s pretty annoying. Pl see into that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

