<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s secret ad network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Seuss</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135807</link>
		<dc:creator>Seuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135807</guid>
		<description>...and yes, DoubleClick is still alive and doing well as one of (if not THE) largest ad serving company in the world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and yes, DoubleClick is still alive and doing well as one of (if not THE) largest ad serving company in the world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thord Hedengren</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135677</link>
		<dc:creator>Thord Hedengren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135677</guid>
		<description>Indeed. For all you who posted your comment earlier, the one that was online when I replied was Mike&#039;s. I didn&#039;t ignore you or anything. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. For all you who posted your comment earlier, the one that was online when I replied was Mike&#8217;s. I didn&#8217;t ignore you or anything. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rundle</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135672</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135672</guid>
		<description>Wow, nothing like comment approvals going through at odd times lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, nothing like comment approvals going through at odd times lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thord Hedengren</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135618</link>
		<dc:creator>Thord Hedengren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135618</guid>
		<description>Hah! Of course it does! That proofing thing again. Thanks Mike, I&#039;ve corrected it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah! Of course it does! That proofing thing again. Thanks Mike, I&#8217;ve corrected it. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rundle</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135616</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135616</guid>
		<description>Hey Thord, CPM means costs per thousand impressions, not million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Thord, CPM means costs per thousand impressions, not million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost Schuur</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135606</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost Schuur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135606</guid>
		<description>CPM stands for &#039;cost per mille&#039;. It&#039;s cost per thousand, not million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPM stands for &#8216;cost per mille&#8217;. It&#8217;s cost per thousand, not million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Engler @ UnsubCentral</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135601</link>
		<dc:creator>John Engler @ UnsubCentral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135601</guid>
		<description>Actually, CPM = Cost Per Thousand.  Think Roman numerals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, CPM = Cost Per Thousand.  Think Roman numerals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Agarwal</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135592</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Agarwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135592</guid>
		<description>I guess this is just giving the advertisers an extra option to choose any section of the publisher&#039;s website where they to put their ads.. so just part of the site targeting feature which has existed in Adwords for long.

BTW, CPM = cost per mile (thousand)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess this is just giving the advertisers an extra option to choose any section of the publisher&#8217;s website where they to put their ads.. so just part of the site targeting feature which has existed in Adwords for long.</p>
<p>BTW, CPM = cost per mile (thousand)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starked SF, Unforgiving News from the Bay &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town: Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135586</link>
		<dc:creator>Starked SF, Unforgiving News from the Bay &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town: Tuesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135586</guid>
		<description>[...] Google&#8217;s Secret Ad Network. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google&#8217;s Secret Ad Network. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-135579</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2006/11/28/googles-secret-ad-network/#comment-135579</guid>
		<description>Cost per thousand...not cost per million. (The &lt;em&gt;M&lt;/em&gt; is the Roman numeral for Thousand.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cost per thousand&#8230;not cost per million. (The <em>M</em> is the Roman numeral for Thousand.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

