<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: False Positives and Better Akismet Spam Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Wp Wordpress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; False Positives of Spam Management</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-292256</link>
		<dc:creator>Wp Wordpress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; False Positives of Spam Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-292256</guid>
		<description>[...] out his full post at the Blog Herald, which includes tips on how to find false postives in your flagged [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out his full post at the Blog Herald, which includes tips on how to find false postives in your flagged [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maki</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-166437</link>
		<dc:creator>Maki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-166437</guid>
		<description>Spending two hours going through Spam is a horrible way to spend time.  On another note, Andy Beard recently wrote a similar article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://andybeard.eu/2007/02/akismet-the-danger-of-collective-intelligence-and-why-i-dont-use-it.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Akismet and spam management&lt;/a&gt; that is worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spending two hours going through Spam is a horrible way to spend time.  On another note, Andy Beard recently wrote a similar article on <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/02/akismet-the-danger-of-collective-intelligence-and-why-i-dont-use-it.html" rel="nofollow">Akismet and spam management</a> that is worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-166394</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-166394</guid>
		<description>have you done any searches for 1800HART in your spam pages? I know I&#039;ve lost many comments here. But, after a while I figured .. it was just an impulse comment anyway - if it was really contributing to the betterment of life I would just let you know and ask to be un-spam-detected (which I have done in the past).

I don&#039;t mind being a statistic in people&#039;s footer. Often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you done any searches for 1800HART in your spam pages? I know I&#8217;ve lost many comments here. But, after a while I figured .. it was just an impulse comment anyway &#8211; if it was really contributing to the betterment of life I would just let you know and ask to be un-spam-detected (which I have done in the past).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind being a statistic in people&#8217;s footer. Often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-166252</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-166252</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Spam Arrest for a couple of years now.   It really works for me and it seems more and more people I know keep joining it, I guess more and more people like me are just getting to much spam for any filter to work.  You should check it out if you haven&#039;t already its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spamarrest.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spam Arrest&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Spam Arrest for a couple of years now.   It really works for me and it seems more and more people I know keep joining it, I guess more and more people like me are just getting to much spam for any filter to work.  You should check it out if you haven&#8217;t already its <a href="http://www.spamarrest.com" rel="nofollow">Spam Arrest</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-166187</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-166187</guid>
		<description>Oh, I forgot. Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/09/akismet-auntie-spam-firefox-greasemonkey-page-viewing-script/&quot; title=&quot;Akismet Auntie Spam Firefox-Greasemonkey Page Viewing Script&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Akismet Auntie Spam Firefox-Greasemonkey Page Viewing Script&lt;/a&gt; by my buddy, Engtech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot. Check out <a href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/09/akismet-auntie-spam-firefox-greasemonkey-page-viewing-script/" title="Akismet Auntie Spam Firefox-Greasemonkey Page Viewing Script" rel="nofollow">Akismet Auntie Spam Firefox-Greasemonkey Page Viewing Script</a> by my buddy, Engtech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-166185</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-166185</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been begging for a per page delete for ages. It&#039;s critical to the success of handling that many comment spams. 

After a trip recently, and several days offline, I found over 6,000 comment spams. When the paging feature goes into the hundreds, there is no way to keep up with all of that. I do the same searching and other techniques you mentioned, but I fear that some are still caught. Still, 4-8 found in 3000+ is pretty good comment spam catching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been begging for a per page delete for ages. It&#8217;s critical to the success of handling that many comment spams. </p>
<p>After a trip recently, and several days offline, I found over 6,000 comment spams. When the paging feature goes into the hundreds, there is no way to keep up with all of that. I do the same searching and other techniques you mentioned, but I fear that some are still caught. Still, 4-8 found in 3000+ is pretty good comment spam catching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-166165</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-166165</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just given up on clearing out the spam as I get so much now.  My priority is just making sure none sneaks through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just given up on clearing out the spam as I get so much now.  My priority is just making sure none sneaks through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; False Positives of Spam Management&#160;by&#160;Blogging Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-166124</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; False Positives of Spam Management&#160;by&#160;Blogging Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-166124</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out his full post at the Blog Herald, which includes tips on how to find false postives in your flagged list.   Tags: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out his full post at the Blog Herald, which includes tips on how to find false postives in your flagged list.   Tags: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-166060</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-166060</guid>
		<description>Akismet is one of the best SPAM filters out there. However, there are a number of obvious improvements that can be made to:
- Improve accuracy of filtering
- Making it easy to scan through and separate valid comments from true spam

When looking at a site for a different product, they had an interesting approach where people could register and then post &quot;proposed product enhancements&quot;. More interesting, one go could through the existing list and &quot;vote&quot; for developments of interest. This enabled the user community to official register their wish-list and also, as a group, to prioritise them. I hope that Akismet and other products will take a similar approach. That way, rather than posting them on a blog like this (which is admirable, given the absence of other formal feedback mechanisms) one can feed direct into the design community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Akismet is one of the best SPAM filters out there. However, there are a number of obvious improvements that can be made to:<br />
- Improve accuracy of filtering<br />
- Making it easy to scan through and separate valid comments from true spam</p>
<p>When looking at a site for a different product, they had an interesting approach where people could register and then post &#8220;proposed product enhancements&#8221;. More interesting, one go could through the existing list and &#8220;vote&#8221; for developments of interest. This enabled the user community to official register their wish-list and also, as a group, to prioritise them. I hope that Akismet and other products will take a similar approach. That way, rather than posting them on a blog like this (which is admirable, given the absence of other formal feedback mechanisms) one can feed direct into the design community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/comment-page-1/#comment-166016</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/14/false-positives-and-better-akismet-spam-management/#comment-166016</guid>
		<description>I think thats a great idea, at least a filter or two you can run the list of spam through to thin the list down ie

Delete/hide spam with more than 6 links or any of &#039;these&#039; words (the general spamish words) or from know spammy ips/emails.

or just order by spamification so all of the lease spammy float to the top and can be plucked out easier :)

Great post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think thats a great idea, at least a filter or two you can run the list of spam through to thin the list down ie</p>
<p>Delete/hide spam with more than 6 links or any of &#8216;these&#8217; words (the general spamish words) or from know spammy ips/emails.</p>
<p>or just order by spamification so all of the lease spammy float to the top and can be plucked out easier :)</p>
<p>Great post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

