<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Digg&#8217;s UnBanning Doesn&#8217;t Address</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/24/what-diggs-unbanning-doesnt-address/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/24/what-diggs-unbanning-doesnt-address/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan and Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/24/what-diggs-unbanning-doesnt-address/comment-page-1/#comment-171078</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan and Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/24/what-diggs-unbanning-doesnt-address/#comment-171078</guid>
		<description>Guys,

I personally would like to see Digg, Netscape, and Reddit do away with the concept of un-voting - the &quot;bury&quot; or &quot;sink&quot; buttons. That would end this discussion of &quot;mass burials&quot;.

The &quot;Digg this&quot; and &quot;Vote&quot; buttons are pretty simple. You like the post, you vote. You don&#039;t like it, don&#039;t read it and don&#039;t vote. There&#039;s no reason to kick it in the ribs. I have yet to see a really convincing argument of why these buttons have value, other then &quot;that&#039;s how it is on Digg&quot;.

In a way this is like going to the polls every 4 years and un-voting people. Kinda weird. Just my opinion of course. :-)

Have an awesome day!
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,</p>
<p>I personally would like to see Digg, Netscape, and Reddit do away with the concept of un-voting &#8211; the &#8220;bury&#8221; or &#8220;sink&#8221; buttons. That would end this discussion of &#8220;mass burials&#8221;.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Digg this&#8221; and &#8220;Vote&#8221; buttons are pretty simple. You like the post, you vote. You don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t read it and don&#8217;t vote. There&#8217;s no reason to kick it in the ribs. I have yet to see a really convincing argument of why these buttons have value, other then &#8220;that&#8217;s how it is on Digg&#8221;.</p>
<p>In a way this is like going to the polls every 4 years and un-voting people. Kinda weird. Just my opinion of course. :-)</p>
<p>Have an awesome day!<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hung</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/24/what-diggs-unbanning-doesnt-address/comment-page-1/#comment-170136</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/24/what-diggs-unbanning-doesnt-address/#comment-170136</guid>
		<description>Yep -- lots of these examples abound.
Duggtrends (http://duggtrends.com/buried.aspx) is a great resource for stories that have been buried right off the frontpage.  Several of my own posts at DJI have been buried as well -- and its no secret the ones which are sensitive to this -- ones which are critical of Digg, ones which discuss SEO, and even the fact that its a blog entry at all.

Cheers
t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep &#8212; lots of these examples abound.<br />
Duggtrends (<a href="http://duggtrends.com/buried.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://duggtrends.com/buried.aspx</a>) is a great resource for stories that have been buried right off the frontpage.  Several of my own posts at DJI have been buried as well &#8212; and its no secret the ones which are sensitive to this &#8212; ones which are critical of Digg, ones which discuss SEO, and even the fact that its a blog entry at all.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/24/what-diggs-unbanning-doesnt-address/comment-page-1/#comment-170086</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/02/24/what-diggs-unbanning-doesnt-address/#comment-170086</guid>
		<description>Last week was a classic example of the influence of the Digg mafia who succeded in burying &lt;a&gt; and stopping it hitting the homepage.  It did however still get over 300 diggs as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://techtites.com/2007/02/24/how-reddit-beat-the-digg-mafia/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reddit Mob &lt;/a&gt; and other disgruntled Digg users tried to get it re-instated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week was a classic example of the influence of the Digg mafia who succeded in burying <a> and stopping it hitting the homepage.  It did however still get over 300 diggs as the </a><a href="http://techtites.com/2007/02/24/how-reddit-beat-the-digg-mafia/" rel="nofollow">Reddit Mob </a> and other disgruntled Digg users tried to get it re-instated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

