<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Online Publishers Do Enough To Correct Inaccuracies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/11/do-online-publishers-do-enough-to-correct-inaccuracies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/11/do-online-publishers-do-enough-to-correct-inaccuracies/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/11/do-online-publishers-do-enough-to-correct-inaccuracies/comment-page-1/#comment-174303</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/11/do-online-publishers-do-enough-to-correct-inaccuracies/#comment-174303</guid>
		<description>Well, what counts as inaccurate? &quot;Federated Media Raising More Money, Looking to Sell&quot; may have been true at some point. Or even if not true, may have been some writer&#039;s best guess at some point. This is as much a fact as the fact that Federated Media wasn&#039;t raining money, etc.

The online record is what it is. Determinations of truth or falsity are *separate* events, subsequent to the original posting. In my case, I let things stand. If a correction is warranted, someone will posted it in the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, what counts as inaccurate? &#8220;Federated Media Raising More Money, Looking to Sell&#8221; may have been true at some point. Or even if not true, may have been some writer&#8217;s best guess at some point. This is as much a fact as the fact that Federated Media wasn&#8217;t raining money, etc.</p>
<p>The online record is what it is. Determinations of truth or falsity are *separate* events, subsequent to the original posting. In my case, I let things stand. If a correction is warranted, someone will posted it in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/11/do-online-publishers-do-enough-to-correct-inaccuracies/comment-page-1/#comment-174036</link>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/11/do-online-publishers-do-enough-to-correct-inaccuracies/#comment-174036</guid>
		<description>Probably not perfect, but the best I know of (because I helped implement) is at CNET News.com. Try http://corrections.news.com/

John Roberts
formerly CNET, now OpenDNS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably not perfect, but the best I know of (because I helped implement) is at CNET News.com. Try <a href="http://corrections.news.com/" rel="nofollow">http://corrections.news.com/</a></p>
<p>John Roberts<br />
formerly CNET, now OpenDNS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billg</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/11/do-online-publishers-do-enough-to-correct-inaccuracies/comment-page-1/#comment-174006</link>
		<dc:creator>billg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/11/do-online-publishers-do-enough-to-correct-inaccuracies/#comment-174006</guid>
		<description>Use the technology:  Post a separate correction, and insert a parenthetical correction in the original, and now incorrect, item.

When discussing truth and accuracy, the standard shouldn&#039;t be the limitations imposed by technology used by other media can do, but what bloggers can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use the technology:  Post a separate correction, and insert a parenthetical correction in the original, and now incorrect, item.</p>
<p>When discussing truth and accuracy, the standard shouldn&#8217;t be the limitations imposed by technology used by other media can do, but what bloggers can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

