<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A-List Debate: Define Success First</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: What Are You Not Doing With Your Blog : The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-366835</link>
		<dc:creator>What Are You Not Doing With Your Blog : The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-366835</guid>
		<description>[...] did I want to go with my blog? Where did I end up? Where do I really want to be? What am I doing to get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] did I want to go with my blog? Where did I end up? Where do I really want to be? What am I doing to get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Difference Between A-List Bloggers and the rest of the alphabet&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-185970</link>
		<dc:creator>The Difference Between A-List Bloggers and the rest of the alphabet&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 05:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-185970</guid>
		<description>[...] I should add that this is all truly irrelevant unless you are simply looking for a benchmark to help you set your blogging goals. And to be honest, its still irrelevant because success is relative. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I should add that this is all truly irrelevant unless you are simply looking for a benchmark to help you set your blogging goals. And to be honest, its still irrelevant because success is relative. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Love 2007.05.12 &#124; drivebyshooter.net</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-184459</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Love 2007.05.12 &#124; drivebyshooter.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 08:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-184459</guid>
		<description>[...] Liz Strauss is on a quest for 200 truly unique blogs.  The latest (week 7) recap has the number hovering at around 75.  An endorsement from an A-Lister (or is she more like a T-Lister) like Liz is bound to get you quite a bit of link love. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liz Strauss is on a quest for 200 truly unique blogs.  The latest (week 7) recap has the number hovering at around 75.  An endorsement from an A-Lister (or is she more like a T-Lister) like Liz is bound to get you quite a bit of link love. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edrei</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-176962</link>
		<dc:creator>Edrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-176962</guid>
		<description>Yes, there are so many types of bloggers out there that at one point, I don&#039;t think it really matters. There really isn&#039;t any right or wrong way to blog. We all have our different styles, traits and personalities that make us unique.

But if your style caters to a small group of people and you want a larger audience, then you probably have to change the way you write.

It&#039;s much like being in real life. People like me want to be who we are but at the same time we also like the company of others. Yet who we are isn&#039;t always accepted by others. It&#039;s a tradeoff there, but we eventually learn be more than just who we are and in that gain people we never thought of as friends. 

In blogging terms that simply means blogs are as they are. We might not agree with them, but that doesn&#039;t mean other people do. If we don&#039;t, we have an option not to read them. They may grow up and learn new ways or they won&#039;t. In the grand scheme of things, it works no matter what happens. We will all still be in our own communities we create. If they complain about why they don&#039;t have much of a community being who they are despite offers for help and guidance, then that&#039;s their business, their life and their blog. Where they go from there is up to them.

I don&#039;t know whether I made any sense there or not. My thoughts are a little jumbled bringing out this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there are so many types of bloggers out there that at one point, I don&#8217;t think it really matters. There really isn&#8217;t any right or wrong way to blog. We all have our different styles, traits and personalities that make us unique.</p>
<p>But if your style caters to a small group of people and you want a larger audience, then you probably have to change the way you write.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s much like being in real life. People like me want to be who we are but at the same time we also like the company of others. Yet who we are isn&#8217;t always accepted by others. It&#8217;s a tradeoff there, but we eventually learn be more than just who we are and in that gain people we never thought of as friends. </p>
<p>In blogging terms that simply means blogs are as they are. We might not agree with them, but that doesn&#8217;t mean other people do. If we don&#8217;t, we have an option not to read them. They may grow up and learn new ways or they won&#8217;t. In the grand scheme of things, it works no matter what happens. We will all still be in our own communities we create. If they complain about why they don&#8217;t have much of a community being who they are despite offers for help and guidance, then that&#8217;s their business, their life and their blog. Where they go from there is up to them.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know whether I made any sense there or not. My thoughts are a little jumbled bringing out this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why do you blog and/or write?</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-176891</link>
		<dc:creator>Why do you blog and/or write?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-176891</guid>
		<description>[...] Writing for The Blog Herald, Lorelle Van Fossen airs her opinion on the great A List debate (if you haven&#8217;t heard about it, there is a link in Lorelle&#8217;s post). It&#8217;s a refreshing read, because Lorelle suggests that the success of a blog can only really be determined by the original intentions of the blogger. This is true, and I think it is something which can be applied to writers too. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Writing for The Blog Herald, Lorelle Van Fossen airs her opinion on the great A List debate (if you haven&#8217;t heard about it, there is a link in Lorelle&#8217;s post). It&#8217;s a refreshing read, because Lorelle suggests that the success of a blog can only really be determined by the original intentions of the blogger. This is true, and I think it is something which can be applied to writers too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-176833</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-176833</guid>
		<description>OOOh, a new category of bloggers for just you and me, Liz! ;-)

Good additions. 

I would probably also add FW-List bloggers who use the F-word and other &quot;shocking&quot; language and bad behavior, lacking moral values, bloggers who do what they do because it generates and attracts negative attention and energy. 

There are so many lists out there, exploring what it is that defines success for them helps us to understand more about why people blog and what they get out of it that makes their blogging a success. For them. Not the list builders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOOh, a new category of bloggers for just you and me, Liz! ;-)</p>
<p>Good additions. </p>
<p>I would probably also add FW-List bloggers who use the F-word and other &#8220;shocking&#8221; language and bad behavior, lacking moral values, bloggers who do what they do because it generates and attracts negative attention and energy. </p>
<p>There are so many lists out there, exploring what it is that defines success for them helps us to understand more about why people blog and what they get out of it that makes their blogging a success. For them. Not the list builders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What list are you on?</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-176798</link>
		<dc:creator>What list are you on?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-176798</guid>
		<description>[...] Over at Blog Herald Lorelle sums up the &#8220;A list&#8221; babble with a nice post, asking the most relevent question how do you define success [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over at Blog Herald Lorelle sums up the &#8220;A list&#8221; babble with a nice post, asking the most relevent question how do you define success [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-176771</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-176771</guid>
		<description>Hi Lorelle,
I love this article! Your lists are so on the mark. I&#039;d like to add two that I would call the &quot;black hat&quot; bloggers

LTS bloggers blog anything that will links, traffic, or search engine juice. They write sensational headlines, name drop, and stuff posts with key words thinking those things help. They make long link lists of other bloggers to game the system, hoping other bloggers will pick up the list and pass it on giving them link after link after link that is tied to no content.

IU bloggers writer impolite, unprofessional emails asking for things such as link exchanges and favors from other bloggers they don&#039;t know.

and to end on a high note
LLH bloggers -- they&#039;re the one in a million blogger you meet who you know from the first word is going to be a lifelong friendand hero.

You, Lorelle, are an LLH blogger for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lorelle,<br />
I love this article! Your lists are so on the mark. I&#8217;d like to add two that I would call the &#8220;black hat&#8221; bloggers</p>
<p>LTS bloggers blog anything that will links, traffic, or search engine juice. They write sensational headlines, name drop, and stuff posts with key words thinking those things help. They make long link lists of other bloggers to game the system, hoping other bloggers will pick up the list and pass it on giving them link after link after link that is tied to no content.</p>
<p>IU bloggers writer impolite, unprofessional emails asking for things such as link exchanges and favors from other bloggers they don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>and to end on a high note<br />
LLH bloggers &#8212; they&#8217;re the one in a million blogger you meet who you know from the first word is going to be a lifelong friendand hero.</p>
<p>You, Lorelle, are an LLH blogger for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Performancing Metrics Unveiled at The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-176720</link>
		<dc:creator>Performancing Metrics Unveiled at The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-176720</guid>
		<description>[...] Attention   Mar 26, 2007 at 8:36 pm by J. Angelo Racoma - David Krug announces over at Performancing.com that they have launched a totally new Performancing Metrics, which is a comprehensive analytics package geared towards bloggers of all kinds (that means whether you&#8217;re an A-lister, Z-lister, or whatever lister, as Lorelle defines here). Performancing Metrics is a new and unique web analyzer that gives bloggers and smaller web sites a more personal understanding of their visitors. Many analyzers give good summaries, and Performancing Metrics is no different - but the similarities stop there. Performancing Metrics stands out with its refreshingly clean and simple interface, innovative features like Spy and RSS feeds, and an unrivaled per visitor level of detail. You also get real time stats, outbound link tracking, download tracking, and much much more. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attention   Mar 26, 2007 at 8:36 pm by J. Angelo Racoma &#8211; David Krug announces over at Performancing.com that they have launched a totally new Performancing Metrics, which is a comprehensive analytics package geared towards bloggers of all kinds (that means whether you&#8217;re an A-lister, Z-lister, or whatever lister, as Lorelle defines here). Performancing Metrics is a new and unique web analyzer that gives bloggers and smaller web sites a more personal understanding of their visitors. Many analyzers give good summaries, and Performancing Metrics is no different &#8211; but the similarities stop there. Performancing Metrics stands out with its refreshingly clean and simple interface, innovative features like Spy and RSS feeds, and an unrivaled per visitor level of detail. You also get real time stats, outbound link tracking, download tracking, and much much more. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Custom Writer</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-176683</link>
		<dc:creator>Custom Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-176683</guid>
		<description>success is a personal thing.  the other day my friend and i were chatting.  her idea of success was to know all the people to know. mine is to know all the creative, intellectually forward people.  
my blog has great ideas and tips for people and just stuff to ponder.  however, blog wise i would have to define success as making an income.  i write my blog with 2 intentions. one for info and two to make income.  however, if i did not make an income i would have to drop my blog.  i probably would still keep a personal blog because i like to write and i have a big mouth.
&lt;a
href=&quot;http://proessays.com/&quot;&gt;Custom Writer&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>success is a personal thing.  the other day my friend and i were chatting.  her idea of success was to know all the people to know. mine is to know all the creative, intellectually forward people.<br />
my blog has great ideas and tips for people and just stuff to ponder.  however, blog wise i would have to define success as making an income.  i write my blog with 2 intentions. one for info and two to make income.  however, if i did not make an income i would have to drop my blog.  i probably would still keep a personal blog because i like to write and i have a big mouth.<br />
<a href="http://proessays.com/">Custom Writer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-176657</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-176657</guid>
		<description>The list of bloggers who blog on a subject they&#039;ve seen other people doing well is known as the &quot;blogosphere&quot;. ;-)

The other lists are for those who stand out from that crowd.

You ask a very good question. With more readers, and commenters, comes responsibility. Does it change who you are and how you blog when you move beyond the basics?

As with everything, as you grow there will be changes. A favorite quote of mine is &quot;Change is inevitable. Growth is optional&quot;. The same goes with blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list of bloggers who blog on a subject they&#8217;ve seen other people doing well is known as the &#8220;blogosphere&#8221;. ;-)</p>
<p>The other lists are for those who stand out from that crowd.</p>
<p>You ask a very good question. With more readers, and commenters, comes responsibility. Does it change who you are and how you blog when you move beyond the basics?</p>
<p>As with everything, as you grow there will be changes. A favorite quote of mine is &#8220;Change is inevitable. Growth is optional&#8221;. The same goes with blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ploop</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/comment-page-1/#comment-176624</link>
		<dc:creator>ploop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/26/a-list-debate-define-success-first/#comment-176624</guid>
		<description>A facinating post for me, as a z-lister, to read.  My blog is still young enough that when I get a comment it makes my day.  But I&#039;m aware it&#039;s a case of ever-shifting sands: if I get to a stage where I am getting comments regularly then I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll start worrying about the next step.  But with more readers comes responsibility - can you still be yourself when you are a one person newspaper? 

I wonder if there&#039;s another list?  A list of bloggers who simply blog on a subject they&#039;ve seen other people doing well with.

Great blog.
Cheers,
ploop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A facinating post for me, as a z-lister, to read.  My blog is still young enough that when I get a comment it makes my day.  But I&#8217;m aware it&#8217;s a case of ever-shifting sands: if I get to a stage where I am getting comments regularly then I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll start worrying about the next step.  But with more readers comes responsibility &#8211; can you still be yourself when you are a one person newspaper? </p>
<p>I wonder if there&#8217;s another list?  A list of bloggers who simply blog on a subject they&#8217;ve seen other people doing well with.</p>
<p>Great blog.<br />
Cheers,<br />
ploop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

