<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shattering The Myth of Short Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/28/shattering-the-myth-of-short-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/28/shattering-the-myth-of-short-posts/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Avanade.Employees.JoeF.Blog::Title : On Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/28/shattering-the-myth-of-short-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-184220</link>
		<dc:creator>Avanade.Employees.JoeF.Blog::Title : On Writing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 05:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/28/shattering-the-myth-of-short-posts/#comment-184220</guid>
		<description>[...] I did some research on writing tips today and found a couple of good articles on problogger.net.&#160; The first article&#160;contains a list of ten principles to follow when writing entries.&#160; Some of the author&#039;s suggestions were good, such as making your opinion known in few words, editing your post for errors, and keeping your style consistent.&#160; However, some, such as &quot;link like crazy&quot; seemed a little more context specific (for example, if I&#039;m blogging what happened throughout the day, I&#039;m probably not going to have a ton of references).&#160; I completley disagree with his suggestion to limit posts to 250 words (read more here): some topics warrant longer discussion to get the point across and have your audience understand.&#160; In all, however, this article was fairly helpful, although it does contain some humorous typos. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I did some research on writing tips today and found a couple of good articles on problogger.net.&nbsp; The first article&nbsp;contains a list of ten principles to follow when writing entries.&nbsp; Some of the author&#8217;s suggestions were good, such as making your opinion known in few words, editing your post for errors, and keeping your style consistent.&nbsp; However, some, such as &#8220;link like crazy&#8221; seemed a little more context specific (for example, if I&#8217;m blogging what happened throughout the day, I&#8217;m probably not going to have a ton of references).&nbsp; I completley disagree with his suggestion to limit posts to 250 words (read more here): some topics warrant longer discussion to get the point across and have your audience understand.&nbsp; In all, however, this article was fairly helpful, although it does contain some humorous typos. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackdavid</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/28/shattering-the-myth-of-short-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-177746</link>
		<dc:creator>jackdavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/28/shattering-the-myth-of-short-posts/#comment-177746</guid>
		<description>its very good can u tell me more about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its very good can u tell me more about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave C.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/28/shattering-the-myth-of-short-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-177650</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/03/28/shattering-the-myth-of-short-posts/#comment-177650</guid>
		<description>I agree completely, Tony. If long posts were less successful than short posts, Steve Pavlina would have stopped blogging a long time ago. I firmly believe that quality writing and content is the key to success. I think breaking pieces up into easily consumable bits, similar to this very post, makes it easier on the eyes and more likely to to be read all the way through. 

I also believe the journalistic style of 1. say what you&#039;re going to say, 2. say it, and 3. say what you said, makes perusing a lot easier for people. Get to the point quick so people know right away what you&#039;re discussing. That way they don&#039;t feel like they need to read the entire post if it&#039;s not a priority for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely, Tony. If long posts were less successful than short posts, Steve Pavlina would have stopped blogging a long time ago. I firmly believe that quality writing and content is the key to success. I think breaking pieces up into easily consumable bits, similar to this very post, makes it easier on the eyes and more likely to to be read all the way through. </p>
<p>I also believe the journalistic style of 1. say what you&#8217;re going to say, 2. say it, and 3. say what you said, makes perusing a lot easier for people. Get to the point quick so people know right away what you&#8217;re discussing. That way they don&#8217;t feel like they need to read the entire post if it&#8217;s not a priority for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

