<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social News Idea Grab Bag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering the blogosphere, Web 2.0, new technology, and related topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:10:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thad</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-183043</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/#comment-183043</guid>
		<description>To compliment your point that &quot;often times the big social news sites tend to look more like popularity contests&quot; here is a quick comic:

http://www.thadguy.com/comic/that-explains-it/35/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To compliment your point that &#8220;often times the big social news sites tend to look more like popularity contests&#8221; here is a quick comic:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thadguy.com/comic/that-explains-it/35/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thadguy.com/comic/that-explains-it/35/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neothoughts &#187; Social News Idea Grab Bag</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-182368</link>
		<dc:creator>Neothoughts &#187; Social News Idea Grab Bag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/#comment-182368</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue reading&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue reading&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Poindexter</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-181635</link>
		<dc:creator>David Poindexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/#comment-181635</guid>
		<description>While agreeing on nearly every issue raised, I have to disagree with the voting by source idea.

I dont believe rating an entire source based on a single story is a good idea. Everyone has a bad day; however, perhaps you can track how many &quot;bad days&quot; a source has and rate the source based on that? Some kind of a weighted statistic of sorts.

For example, if only one in ten stories are deemed valuable, that source will be regarded as less valuable in general than a source that has an eight in ten value rating.

Using this method, it is still possible to recover from a bad post, or a series of bad posts, instead of essentially being &quot;blacklisted&quot; as a &quot;bad source.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While agreeing on nearly every issue raised, I have to disagree with the voting by source idea.</p>
<p>I dont believe rating an entire source based on a single story is a good idea. Everyone has a bad day; however, perhaps you can track how many &#8220;bad days&#8221; a source has and rate the source based on that? Some kind of a weighted statistic of sorts.</p>
<p>For example, if only one in ten stories are deemed valuable, that source will be regarded as less valuable in general than a source that has an eight in ten value rating.</p>
<p>Using this method, it is still possible to recover from a bad post, or a series of bad posts, instead of essentially being &#8220;blacklisted&#8221; as a &#8220;bad source.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-181482</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/#comment-181482</guid>
		<description>I agree with the Anonymity to a certain point, I think it would be a great idea to hide the user until the story hits the homepage, having a users story hit the homepage is important to a lot of users. They like to see their name &quot;in lights&quot;. I personally would like to remain anonymous until my story reaches the homepage that way I would know for sure my story was voted on because of the interest not because I&#039;m popular, I would like to still have the recognition on the Homepage. The problem with this is the sheer amount of stories submitted and finding these without the use of friends, I suppose you could still show what your friends are voting on just not submitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the Anonymity to a certain point, I think it would be a great idea to hide the user until the story hits the homepage, having a users story hit the homepage is important to a lot of users. They like to see their name &#8220;in lights&#8221;. I personally would like to remain anonymous until my story reaches the homepage that way I would know for sure my story was voted on because of the interest not because I&#8217;m popular, I would like to still have the recognition on the Homepage. The problem with this is the sheer amount of stories submitted and finding these without the use of friends, I suppose you could still show what your friends are voting on just not submitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Reporter &#187; Some Interesting Ideas for Social Networking</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-181462</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Reporter &#187; Some Interesting Ideas for Social Networking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/17/social-news-idea-grab-bag/#comment-181462</guid>
		<description>[...] Derek Van Vliet at the Blog Herald has some interesting ideas in this article about ways to improve social networking sites. I heartily agree with much he has put forth. Check it out when you get a minute. This blog post is well worth a read. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Derek Van Vliet at the Blog Herald has some interesting ideas in this article about ways to improve social networking sites. I heartily agree with much he has put forth. Check it out when you get a minute. This blog post is well worth a read. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
