<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Perils of Doing Interviews With A-Bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Promoting Your Wares to Bloggers &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-183919</link>
		<dc:creator>Promoting Your Wares to Bloggers &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 12:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/#comment-183919</guid>
		<description>[...] Recently, a top blogger and an online news service had a public exchange of words because the blogger wanted to be interviewed by email only. The news folks turned him down. First, this isn&#8217;t news and shouldn&#8217;t have been made public because it can look bad from both sides of the story. But it&#8217;s out there and now people can take turn pointing fingers (including me  ). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently, a top blogger and an online news service had a public exchange of words because the blogger wanted to be interviewed by email only. The news folks turned him down. First, this isn&#8217;t news and shouldn&#8217;t have been made public because it can look bad from both sides of the story. But it&#8217;s out there and now people can take turn pointing fingers (including me  ). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hung</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-183218</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/#comment-183218</guid>
		<description>Tony K -- I agree that Calacanis has every right to conduct interviews the way he&#039;d like.  On the other hand, he also believes that every communication with him is open for republication (in toto) and nothing ought to be kept &quot;off-blog&quot;.  I don&#039;t think that Mr. Vogelstein knew this, and neither did his editors at Wired.  

When a blogger as a substantial audience and decided to make public things that the interviewer had no intention of making public -- then yes, this *is* an issue of scale, because lots of people are actually listening.

If you or I had decided to republish the contents and substance of a conversation with that same journalist, do you think we&#039;d get a similar response from the blogosphere?  Do you think it would still be the top news item for Techmeme 12 hours later? 24h later?

I think we both know the answers to that.

Cheers
Tony &quot;not K&quot; Hung. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony K &#8212; I agree that Calacanis has every right to conduct interviews the way he&#8217;d like.  On the other hand, he also believes that every communication with him is open for republication (in toto) and nothing ought to be kept &#8220;off-blog&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t think that Mr. Vogelstein knew this, and neither did his editors at Wired.  </p>
<p>When a blogger as a substantial audience and decided to make public things that the interviewer had no intention of making public &#8212; then yes, this *is* an issue of scale, because lots of people are actually listening.</p>
<p>If you or I had decided to republish the contents and substance of a conversation with that same journalist, do you think we&#8217;d get a similar response from the blogosphere?  Do you think it would still be the top news item for Techmeme 12 hours later? 24h later?</p>
<p>I think we both know the answers to that.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Tony &#8220;not K&#8221; Hung. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Calacanis vs Wired on Phone Interview &#187; SELaplana</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-183168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Calacanis vs Wired on Phone Interview &#187; SELaplana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/#comment-183168</guid>
		<description>[...] So, just to widen your knowledge on arguments presented by bloggers, more talks here, here, here Please subscribe to our Feed... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, just to widen your knowledge on arguments presented by bloggers, more talks here, here, here Please subscribe to our Feed&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-183147</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Merrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/#comment-183147</guid>
		<description>Ahh, I&#039;d almost forgotten all about JC :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, I&#8217;d almost forgotten all about JC :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony K</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-183106</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/#comment-183106</guid>
		<description>That was me above - just wanted to clarify myself with the first initial of my last name to avoid confusion with Tony Hung.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was me above &#8211; just wanted to clarify myself with the first initial of my last name to avoid confusion with Tony Hung.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-183105</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/04/24/the-perils-of-doing-interviews-with-a-bloggers/#comment-183105</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see this having anything to do with A-List bloggers. It just happened to be Calacanis that had this issue. He has every right to say he will only give email interviews. And those people attacking for it are morons, especially the moron at Wired who blogged about it. I thought Wired sucked before, but now Wired Sucks and is running by immature grade-schoolers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see this having anything to do with A-List bloggers. It just happened to be Calacanis that had this issue. He has every right to say he will only give email interviews. And those people attacking for it are morons, especially the moron at Wired who blogged about it. I thought Wired sucked before, but now Wired Sucks and is running by immature grade-schoolers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

