<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protecting Images: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Web Critiq &#187; The Blog Herald - Blogging about Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-187909</link>
		<dc:creator>The Web Critiq &#187; The Blog Herald - Blogging about Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-187909</guid>
		<description>[...] Protecting Images: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Protecting Images: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beta Alfa &#187; Friktion, Littorin, blogghat, navellöst, webbläst, plastpåsar och annat</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-187893</link>
		<dc:creator>Beta Alfa &#187; Friktion, Littorin, blogghat, navellöst, webbläst, plastpåsar och annat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-187893</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; inte offentligt på internet. Men det finns sätt att göra bildstölder svårare. Blog Herald berättar om [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; inte offentligt på internet. Men det finns sätt att göra bildstölder svårare. Blog Herald berättar om [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BNT&#8217;s Best Of The Week 06/23/07</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-187876</link>
		<dc:creator>BNT&#8217;s Best Of The Week 06/23/07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-187876</guid>
		<description>[...] And finally, for those budding travel photographers worried about protecting their images from online theft, here&#8217;s a guide for you Protecting Images: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And finally, for those budding travel photographers worried about protecting their images from online theft, here&#8217;s a guide for you Protecting Images: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YellowCloud</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-187570</link>
		<dc:creator>YellowCloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-187570</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using an online watermarking website http://www.watermarktool.com and it&#039;s pretty quick and easy to throw on some text or semi-transparent watermarks.  It could use some additional features, but it does at least allow basic positioning, colors, alpha levels, and custom text.  It&#039;d be great to be able to upload multiple images at a time and watermark them all in a batch, but I guess I can&#039;t complain since it&#039;s free :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using an online watermarking website <a href="http://www.watermarktool.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.watermarktool.com</a> and it&#8217;s pretty quick and easy to throw on some text or semi-transparent watermarks.  It could use some additional features, but it does at least allow basic positioning, colors, alpha levels, and custom text.  It&#8217;d be great to be able to upload multiple images at a time and watermark them all in a batch, but I guess I can&#8217;t complain since it&#8217;s free :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Angelo Racoma</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-187567</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-187567</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always a question of security vs. usability.

One thing with images is that they&#039;re not as easy to track online as text content. You can easily find out if a piece of text you wrote has been copied and posted elsewhere. Images, on the other hand, are harder to find, except if they use the exact same filename.

Image hotlinking is easy to discover and prevent, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always a question of security vs. usability.</p>
<p>One thing with images is that they&#8217;re not as easy to track online as text content. You can easily find out if a piece of text you wrote has been copied and posted elsewhere. Images, on the other hand, are harder to find, except if they use the exact same filename.</p>
<p>Image hotlinking is easy to discover and prevent, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B. Hockley</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-187547</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B. Hockley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/06/18/protecting-images-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comment-187547</guid>
		<description>Excellent article.  Too many folks try to tackle the issue of image copyright infringement and end up at either end of the spectrum: it&#039;s a lost cause, so there&#039;s no point in worrying, or don&#039;t put anything online.  As you&#039;ve noted there&#039;s no magic solution but most folks can find something reasonable if they use some common sense.  Copyright on the web is one of the topics I have in mind for a post at my photography blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photoschooled.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Photoschooled&lt;/a&gt; and I&#039;ll likely refer to your post here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.  Too many folks try to tackle the issue of image copyright infringement and end up at either end of the spectrum: it&#8217;s a lost cause, so there&#8217;s no point in worrying, or don&#8217;t put anything online.  As you&#8217;ve noted there&#8217;s no magic solution but most folks can find something reasonable if they use some common sense.  Copyright on the web is one of the topics I have in mind for a post at my photography blog <a href="http://www.photoschooled.com" rel="nofollow">Photoschooled</a> and I&#8217;ll likely refer to your post here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

