Comments on: The Evil Linking of Sploggers and Scrapers Messing With Your Content http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/ The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: How to Add MyFreeCopyright To Your WordPress Blog « Lorelle on WordPress http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/comment-page-1/#comment-625440 How to Add MyFreeCopyright To Your WordPress Blog « Lorelle on WordPress Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:31:03 +0000 http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/#comment-625440 [...] The Evil Linking of Sploggers and Scrapers Messing With Your … [...] [...] The Evil Linking of Sploggers and Scrapers Messing With Your … [...]

]]> By: Are You Willing To Go Naked For One Day For Akismet? « Lorelle on WordPress http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/comment-page-1/#comment-272809 Are You Willing To Go Naked For One Day For Akismet? « Lorelle on WordPress Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:23:31 +0000 http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/#comment-272809 [...] Is Spam? on Akismet. Mark explains what comment spam used to look like, and how it is grown with splogs and scrapers, including covering those annoying automatic scrapper Plugins which say “Fred said something [...] [...] Is Spam? on Akismet. Mark explains what comment spam used to look like, and how it is grown with splogs and scrapers, including covering those annoying automatic scrapper Plugins which say “Fred said something [...]

]]> By: 恶劣的链接搞乱你的博客内容 : 先驱博客 - The Blog Herald China http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/comment-page-1/#comment-190994 恶劣的链接搞乱你的博客内容 : 先驱博客 - The Blog Herald China Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:13:14 +0000 http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/#comment-190994 [...] 原文链接 © Copyright 2007 The Blog Herald | Filed Under Blogging, Features, SEO, Plagiarism | More articles by lorelle [...] [...] 原文链接 © Copyright 2007 The Blog Herald | Filed Under Blogging, Features, SEO, Plagiarism | More articles by lorelle [...]

]]> By: Blog News Watch » Blog Archive » Talk Back: Sploggers and Scrapers and Thieves - Oh My! http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/comment-page-1/#comment-188695 Blog News Watch » Blog Archive » Talk Back: Sploggers and Scrapers and Thieves - Oh My! Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:29:44 +0000 http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/#comment-188695 [...] Back: Sploggers and Scrapers and Thieves - Oh My! July 3rd, 2007 by Sheryl Sisk Just came across this post on The Blog Herald (”The Evil Linking of Sploggers and Scrapers Messing With Your [...] [...] Back: Sploggers and Scrapers and Thieves – Oh My! July 3rd, 2007 by Sheryl Sisk Just came across this post on The Blog Herald (”The Evil Linking of Sploggers and Scrapers Messing With Your [...]

]]> By: Andy Merrett http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/comment-page-1/#comment-188480 Andy Merrett Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:58:16 +0000 http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/#comment-188480 David, Could you be a little less offensive in your attack? I thought you'd grown out of this. David,

Could you be a little less offensive in your attack? I thought you’d grown out of this.

]]> By: Lorelle VanFossen http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/comment-page-1/#comment-188476 Lorelle VanFossen Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:26:05 +0000 http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/#comment-188476 The following are the publicly released patents on the Google PageRank: <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20050071741&OS=20050071741" title="Google Patent for Search Engine Ranking" rel="nofollow">Google's patent for their search engine ranking technique from 2005</a> <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220070061297%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20070061297&RS=DN/20070061297" title="Google Patent Release for pagerank 2007" rel="nofollow">Google PageRank patent release from 2007</a> The following are the publicly released patents on the Google PageRank:

Google’s patent for their search engine ranking technique from 2005
Google PageRank patent release from 2007

]]> By: David Krug http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/comment-page-1/#comment-188414 David Krug Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:39:51 +0000 http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/#comment-188414 Lorelle, I truly believe what you've written here is rubbish. Google's pagerank algorithm is private has not been leaked, no information is roaming around about how it operates. Again yet another story of a blogger who thinks they know how something works when in reality they don't. Will you stop already... Teaching bloggers in this fashion is really misleading. Lorelle,
I truly believe what you’ve written here is rubbish. Google’s pagerank algorithm is private has not been leaked, no information is roaming around about how it operates. Again yet another story of a blogger who thinks they know how something works when in reality they don’t. Will you stop already…

Teaching bloggers in this fashion is really misleading.

]]> By: Lorelle VanFossen http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/comment-page-1/#comment-188383 Lorelle VanFossen Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:24:54 +0000 http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/#comment-188383 The article continues to be valid today. I've updated it and if anything, it is more relevant today due to the increasing ability to compare data in the PageRank algorithm. Google could identify the "stronger" blog if there was enough history to compare to. I've heard many stories from bloggers who had been blogging for a year or so and found their PageRank falling and staying that way until they discovered a splogger scraping their content. Once the splogger was shut down, it took a few months but their PageRank increased. The article continues to be valid today. I’ve updated it and if anything, it is more relevant today due to the increasing ability to compare data in the PageRank algorithm.

Google could identify the “stronger” blog if there was enough history to compare to. I’ve heard many stories from bloggers who had been blogging for a year or so and found their PageRank falling and staying that way until they discovered a splogger scraping their content. Once the splogger was shut down, it took a few months but their PageRank increased.

]]> By: gaman http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/comment-page-1/#comment-188382 gaman Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:51:41 +0000 http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/02/the-evil-linking-of-sploggers-and-scrapers-messing-with-your-content/#comment-188382 I thought Google is able to identify the stronger blog (the original most of the time) and won't penalize it even though its content is duplicated elsewhere. The PageRank you point out was published in 2005, I am sure certain things have changed since. I thought Google is able to identify the stronger blog (the original most of the time) and won’t penalize it even though its content is duplicated elsewhere.

The PageRank you point out was published in 2005, I am sure certain things have changed since.

]]>