<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Tags Working?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Niobe Tamez Gallegos</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1131553</link>
		<dc:creator>Niobe Tamez Gallegos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-1131553</guid>
		<description>I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an shakiness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an shakiness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tottenham Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1130746</link>
		<dc:creator>Tottenham Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-1130746</guid>
		<description>It sounds like you happen to be creating problems oneself by attempting to clear up this problem rather of looking at why their is a problem in the first place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you happen to be creating problems oneself by attempting to clear up this problem rather of looking at why their is a problem in the first place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1129908</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 16:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-1129908</guid>
		<description>This blog kept my own faith up as i was wondering if I should quit. I’m finally starting to get a little understanding of this matter and how to benefit. It is equally hard working on your part because author of this great post. I’ve merely started a website, and I think this article is good advice to whoever wants to learn the important strategies. The only problem is I need more time to know and learn more. Probably that will improve when I start my yearly vacation next month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog kept my own faith up as i was wondering if I should quit. I’m finally starting to get a little understanding of this matter and how to benefit. It is equally hard working on your part because author of this great post. I’ve merely started a website, and I think this article is good advice to whoever wants to learn the important strategies. The only problem is I need more time to know and learn more. Probably that will improve when I start my yearly vacation next month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arsenal Online</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1129090</link>
		<dc:creator>Arsenal Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 05:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-1129090</guid>
		<description>Fast approval web directories , check it out now get a free backlink today!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast approval web directories , check it out now get a free backlink today!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1127193</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-1127193</guid>
		<description>I was just having a conversation over this I am glad I came across this it cleared some of the questions I had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just having a conversation over this I am glad I came across this it cleared some of the questions I had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1126425</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-1126425</guid>
		<description>Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you However I’m experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Regards, Garden Furniture Manufacturer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you However I’m experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Regards, Garden Furniture Manufacturer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-1125748</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-1125748</guid>
		<description>This is so great. I always find such interesting stuff when I stumble onto this site again and again! .Iâ€™m going to be sharing this. Facebook here we come!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so great. I always find such interesting stuff when I stumble onto this site again and again! .Iâ€™m going to be sharing this. Facebook here we come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Szpunar</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-234078</link>
		<dc:creator>David Szpunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-234078</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read a few of your posts on tagging vs. categories, and so far I&#039;ve found, when I started tagging my posts with WordPress 2.3 (I installed Simple Tags and love the auto-completion and ability to bulk-tag old posts), the biggest use I have for them is giving me an easy way to link related content. Thus I tag with this in mind, since each post will display &quot;related posts&quot; at the bottom that have matching tags. It keeps my tags very specific, because I want posts about Google or Gmail to pull up other similar posts, but I wouldn&#039;t use &quot;Web2.0&quot; as a tag because posts with that tag aren&#039;t necessarily all related.

I am not (yet at least) displaying a tag cloud or any user interface to the tags (they&#039;re not listed with each post either), it&#039;s just an internal thing. But I also haven&#039;t tagged a lot of my older posts yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a few of your posts on tagging vs. categories, and so far I&#8217;ve found, when I started tagging my posts with WordPress 2.3 (I installed Simple Tags and love the auto-completion and ability to bulk-tag old posts), the biggest use I have for them is giving me an easy way to link related content. Thus I tag with this in mind, since each post will display &#8220;related posts&#8221; at the bottom that have matching tags. It keeps my tags very specific, because I want posts about Google or Gmail to pull up other similar posts, but I wouldn&#8217;t use &#8220;Web2.0&#8243; as a tag because posts with that tag aren&#8217;t necessarily all related.</p>
<p>I am not (yet at least) displaying a tag cloud or any user interface to the tags (they&#8217;re not listed with each post either), it&#8217;s just an internal thing. But I also haven&#8217;t tagged a lot of my older posts yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Blogroll Cleaning Time : The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-232467</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Blogroll Cleaning Time : The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-232467</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve talked a lot about the difference between the blogger&#8217;s perspective of their blogs versus the reality of the reader&#8217;s experience and n..., which often don&#8217;t line up. Blogroll links may be put there because the blogger thinks they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve talked a lot about the difference between the blogger&#8217;s perspective of their blogs versus the reality of the reader&#8217;s experience and n&#8230;, which often don&#8217;t line up. Blogroll links may be put there because the blogger thinks they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Tags Working For You? &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-219078</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Tags Working For You? &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-219078</guid>
		<description>[...] Are Tags Working For&#160;You?  I asked this question on the Blog Herald: Are Tags Working? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are Tags Working For&nbsp;You?  I asked this question on the Blog Herald: Are Tags Working? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Is the Return on Your Investment in Social Media? : The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-193780</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is the Return on Your Investment in Social Media? : The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-193780</guid>
		<description>[...] about Technorati and all those tags you smeared all over your blog, which you thought would bring you a lot of traffic from Technorati. Does it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about Technorati and all those tags you smeared all over your blog, which you thought would bring you a lot of traffic from Technorati. Does it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climbing Out of Category Hell &#171; Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189636</link>
		<dc:creator>Climbing Out of Category Hell &#171; Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189636</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Tags, however, are more like your blog&#8217;s index words. They are micro-categories. Do you use them when you visit a blog? I&#8217;m not and I&#8217;m wondering why.&#8221; &#8212; Lorelle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Tags, however, are more like your blog&#8217;s index words. They are micro-categories. Do you use them when you visit a blog? I&#8217;m not and I&#8217;m wondering why.&#8221; &#8212; Lorelle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189250</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189250</guid>
		<description>I think it it depends on the context. I recently switched back from using tags (UTW) on my main blog, because I found it difficult to think of consistent and relevant tags. Having broader categories has been more useful in terms of organisation. However, I do still use tagging (Simple Tagging plugin) on a sub-blog which indexes and recommends fiction online. In this case, I use a set number of pre-defined tags for genre etc. so visitors can get to information they are interested in. When I use other sites which have similar reviews, that&#039;s how I prefer to browse, but I confess I&#039;ve never used technorati tag search, or given much consideration to technorati tagging my own posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it it depends on the context. I recently switched back from using tags (UTW) on my main blog, because I found it difficult to think of consistent and relevant tags. Having broader categories has been more useful in terms of organisation. However, I do still use tagging (Simple Tagging plugin) on a sub-blog which indexes and recommends fiction online. In this case, I use a set number of pre-defined tags for genre etc. so visitors can get to information they are interested in. When I use other sites which have similar reviews, that&#8217;s how I prefer to browse, but I confess I&#8217;ve never used technorati tag search, or given much consideration to technorati tagging my own posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189237</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189237</guid>
		<description>Personally no I dont use them and find them annoying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally no I dont use them and find them annoying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189156</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189156</guid>
		<description>I find my writing content tends to overlap different themes.  I might write about blogging, which gets placed in my blogging category, but then I could also be discussing issues regarding blogging, writing better, finding love through blogging, etc.  Tags make it easy to index content that refuses to stay one dimensional.

In addition to bringing in more SE traffic, tag clouds also give me a good feel for what my passions are.  It&#039;s almost a psychological analysis of what topics really matter to me.  So far, &quot;women &quot; seem to top the list.  :D

Tags also make it possible to generate &quot;related posts&quot; link.  I&#039;m using the one inbuilt in UTW and it&#039;s worked great, improving the stickiness of my blog.

I think the major problem regarding tags is that we simply have too many novices who don&#039;t know how to properly tag their content.  This really got pushed on us too quickly without giving us appropriate time to understand how it works, and how to make sensible use of it.  I was almost tempted to flip off the whole tags phenomena because it was frustrating and slowed down my blog writing.  I&#039;m glad I stuck with it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find my writing content tends to overlap different themes.  I might write about blogging, which gets placed in my blogging category, but then I could also be discussing issues regarding blogging, writing better, finding love through blogging, etc.  Tags make it easy to index content that refuses to stay one dimensional.</p>
<p>In addition to bringing in more SE traffic, tag clouds also give me a good feel for what my passions are.  It&#8217;s almost a psychological analysis of what topics really matter to me.  So far, &#8220;women &#8221; seem to top the list.  :D</p>
<p>Tags also make it possible to generate &#8220;related posts&#8221; link.  I&#8217;m using the one inbuilt in UTW and it&#8217;s worked great, improving the stickiness of my blog.</p>
<p>I think the major problem regarding tags is that we simply have too many novices who don&#8217;t know how to properly tag their content.  This really got pushed on us too quickly without giving us appropriate time to understand how it works, and how to make sensible use of it.  I was almost tempted to flip off the whole tags phenomena because it was frustrating and slowed down my blog writing.  I&#8217;m glad I stuck with it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpb</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189149</link>
		<dc:creator>mpb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189149</guid>
		<description>I get a few referrers from Technorati and WordPress tags.

I used Technorati tags in the past so people would be able to look for additional sources of information on the topic of the post. This was because at first there wasn&#039;t much else to look for at the blog and because it was set up as a resource for people to find health and environment info.

Having the categories at each post refer to all WP blogs wasn&#039;t useful (and surprising at first), so I try to point people to the sidebar categories which are blog specific and I use the search site tags.

The site search tags are now in between &quot;find other stuff here written previously&quot; and keywords. I really think they should be keywords, but that is a research bias. Keywords would fit future posts, too.

One problem currently with tags is that it isn&#039;t possible to know what if any standardized tags there are (plural or singular; two words, dashed words, one word; etc.) and which of my tags were used previously without a lot of work. I like Connotea and Flickr and del.icio.us which display one&#039;s tags automatically. Some blog clients, like Zoundry, will store previous tags used on posts.

As a reader, I infrequently use categories unless I&#039;m interested in the writer. Hardly anyone uses site search tags but I rely on them at Lorelle&#039;s. Once in great while I searched Technorati tags but not very fruitfully unless there were very specific tags such as &quot;Yup&#039;ik&quot; It was more useful to search there for blog tags (keywords) rather than post tags. That is, I&#039;m not looking so much for individual posts but for blogs related to certain classes of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get a few referrers from Technorati and WordPress tags.</p>
<p>I used Technorati tags in the past so people would be able to look for additional sources of information on the topic of the post. This was because at first there wasn&#8217;t much else to look for at the blog and because it was set up as a resource for people to find health and environment info.</p>
<p>Having the categories at each post refer to all WP blogs wasn&#8217;t useful (and surprising at first), so I try to point people to the sidebar categories which are blog specific and I use the search site tags.</p>
<p>The site search tags are now in between &#8220;find other stuff here written previously&#8221; and keywords. I really think they should be keywords, but that is a research bias. Keywords would fit future posts, too.</p>
<p>One problem currently with tags is that it isn&#8217;t possible to know what if any standardized tags there are (plural or singular; two words, dashed words, one word; etc.) and which of my tags were used previously without a lot of work. I like Connotea and Flickr and del.icio.us which display one&#8217;s tags automatically. Some blog clients, like Zoundry, will store previous tags used on posts.</p>
<p>As a reader, I infrequently use categories unless I&#8217;m interested in the writer. Hardly anyone uses site search tags but I rely on them at Lorelle&#8217;s. Once in great while I searched Technorati tags but not very fruitfully unless there were very specific tags such as &#8220;Yup&#8217;ik&#8221; It was more useful to search there for blog tags (keywords) rather than post tags. That is, I&#8217;m not looking so much for individual posts but for blogs related to certain classes of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189142</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189142</guid>
		<description>So now I&#039;m reading and learning: Google analytics uses a javascript that spiders and bots do not activate. I guess this means that this means I&#039;m seeing actual visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now I&#8217;m reading and learning: Google analytics uses a javascript that spiders and bots do not activate. I guess this means that this means I&#8217;m seeing actual visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189140</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189140</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to have to dig further into analytics to find out if it&#039;s bots or visitors. I do know that the stats that GA records are vastly different from the server stats, so I&#039;ve kind of assumed that GA filters out the bots. I&#039;ll drill down a bit and let you know what i find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to dig further into analytics to find out if it&#8217;s bots or visitors. I do know that the stats that GA records are vastly different from the server stats, so I&#8217;ve kind of assumed that GA filters out the bots. I&#8217;ll drill down a bit and let you know what i find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189139</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189139</guid>
		<description>Rhys: I&#039;m curious. Wasn&#039;t it the post that got the attention? How do you know it was the tags?

Ming: I have to agree with Brett. The few times I&#039;ve clicked tags, I have not found useful results. Linking to an individual post has lead me to categories, which are also tags (but sorta not), and that led me to better information. But rarely ever do I find related content or good info by clicking tags.

When WordPress Support decided to implement tags, they pushed them to the top and put the categories /forum sections to the bottom. People are still posting and looking for information in the wrong places because they don&#039;t scroll down far enough to find the category information, and when I&#039;ve used the tags, I rarely find the information I need.

You get burned enough, you stop using them.

Chris: Excellent question. Do readers use them. They never show up in my stats in any measurable value, though categories do. I&#039;ve had people also link to my categories, but never my tags that I can recall. 

Has anyone found tags showing up in their stats?

Gary: Obviously, tags are working for you, but I&#039;d love more information on how they worked. Could you separate the actual visitors from the bots? I&#039;ve found that bots love tags but rarely do I find real visitors using the tags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhys: I&#8217;m curious. Wasn&#8217;t it the post that got the attention? How do you know it was the tags?</p>
<p>Ming: I have to agree with Brett. The few times I&#8217;ve clicked tags, I have not found useful results. Linking to an individual post has lead me to categories, which are also tags (but sorta not), and that led me to better information. But rarely ever do I find related content or good info by clicking tags.</p>
<p>When WordPress Support decided to implement tags, they pushed them to the top and put the categories /forum sections to the bottom. People are still posting and looking for information in the wrong places because they don&#8217;t scroll down far enough to find the category information, and when I&#8217;ve used the tags, I rarely find the information I need.</p>
<p>You get burned enough, you stop using them.</p>
<p>Chris: Excellent question. Do readers use them. They never show up in my stats in any measurable value, though categories do. I&#8217;ve had people also link to my categories, but never my tags that I can recall. </p>
<p>Has anyone found tags showing up in their stats?</p>
<p>Gary: Obviously, tags are working for you, but I&#8217;d love more information on how they worked. Could you separate the actual visitors from the bots? I&#8217;ve found that bots love tags but rarely do I find real visitors using the tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189137</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189137</guid>
		<description>Great post!

As a reader, I don&#039;t use tags. As a blogger however, it&#039;s a completely different story.

Several months ago, we gave up on UTW after getting fed up with the continual, time consuming fiddling to fix problems it kept causing. Within weeks, traffic dropped off by about 90%!!!! My IT partner was busy with other projects until recently, when we found the Simple Tagging plugin. It was installed on my main blog as a test.
Bingo! After 5 months of dismal traffic, the growth curve started almost immediately on June 25 and daily uniques have been growing by a couple of percent a day. 

Having spoken with the tech guys at one of the bigger networks, they agreed that their collective traffic could not be sustained without tags.

Keep on tagging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>As a reader, I don&#8217;t use tags. As a blogger however, it&#8217;s a completely different story.</p>
<p>Several months ago, we gave up on UTW after getting fed up with the continual, time consuming fiddling to fix problems it kept causing. Within weeks, traffic dropped off by about 90%!!!! My IT partner was busy with other projects until recently, when we found the Simple Tagging plugin. It was installed on my main blog as a test.<br />
Bingo! After 5 months of dismal traffic, the growth curve started almost immediately on June 25 and daily uniques have been growing by a couple of percent a day. </p>
<p>Having spoken with the tech guys at one of the bigger networks, they agreed that their collective traffic could not be sustained without tags.</p>
<p>Keep on tagging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do Technorati tags solve any purpose? &#124; Content Writing and CopyWriting Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189136</link>
		<dc:creator>Do Technorati tags solve any purpose? &#124; Content Writing and CopyWriting Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189136</guid>
		<description>[...] Are Tags Working? asks Lorelle at The Blog Herald. I started using Technorati tags to increase traffic and I&#8217;ve been using them for many months now. Although I don&#8217;t have the right data to know how they have impacted my traffic (I hardly get any), I implemented them after reading numerous recommendations and I try to use the tags as appropriately as possible. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are Tags Working? asks Lorelle at The Blog Herald. I started using Technorati tags to increase traffic and I&#8217;ve been using them for many months now. Although I don&#8217;t have the right data to know how they have impacted my traffic (I hardly get any), I implemented them after reading numerous recommendations and I try to use the tags as appropriately as possible. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189126</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189126</guid>
		<description>Thought-provoking article.

I use tags on my blog, but they&#039;re configured as &quot;internal&quot;.  In other words, clicking a tag on my blog brings up articles &lt;em&gt;on my blog&lt;/em&gt; for that tag. I don&#039;t send the reader to technorati or elsewhere. So basically, tags for me are just another means of search.

Now, the real question is: How often do readers actually click a tag?  (in other words, are the tags providing any sort of value). Will have to play with some analytics stuff today and try to suss that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought-provoking article.</p>
<p>I use tags on my blog, but they&#8217;re configured as &#8220;internal&#8221;.  In other words, clicking a tag on my blog brings up articles <em>on my blog</em> for that tag. I don&#8217;t send the reader to technorati or elsewhere. So basically, tags for me are just another means of search.</p>
<p>Now, the real question is: How often do readers actually click a tag?  (in other words, are the tags providing any sort of value). Will have to play with some analytics stuff today and try to suss that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189124</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189124</guid>
		<description>I am new to the blogging world, and learning something every day. I use tags hoping to attract readers to my blog. After reading this post I realize the need to carefully tag and categorize the post&#039;s I write. Thank you for pointing this out.
As for using tags to find content I usually stay away from them due to the overwhelming amount of unrelated articles to the tag used. I guess I have been using tags in the way that keeps me away from them.
Once I am viewing a site I do look at the categories to point me in the direction I wish to go. I am going to redo my categories and tag more cautious for now on.
Brett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am new to the blogging world, and learning something every day. I use tags hoping to attract readers to my blog. After reading this post I realize the need to carefully tag and categorize the post&#8217;s I write. Thank you for pointing this out.<br />
As for using tags to find content I usually stay away from them due to the overwhelming amount of unrelated articles to the tag used. I guess I have been using tags in the way that keeps me away from them.<br />
Once I am viewing a site I do look at the categories to point me in the direction I wish to go. I am going to redo my categories and tag more cautious for now on.<br />
Brett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ia</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189123</link>
		<dc:creator>ia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189123</guid>
		<description>Before the recent overhaul, I found Technorati extremely useful for searching recent topics, since the major search engines will most likely place old pages in the front page search results. But now I can&#039;t get anything out of Technorati&#039;s search engine. To think that I preferred it over Google&#039;s BlogSearch before. Is it just me?

I believe in tags, I don&#039;t believe in blog systems that take the control out of tagging (WordPress.com, as you mentioned).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the recent overhaul, I found Technorati extremely useful for searching recent topics, since the major search engines will most likely place old pages in the front page search results. But now I can&#8217;t get anything out of Technorati&#8217;s search engine. To think that I preferred it over Google&#8217;s BlogSearch before. Is it just me?</p>
<p>I believe in tags, I don&#8217;t believe in blog systems that take the control out of tagging (WordPress.com, as you mentioned).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baddie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/comment-page-1/#comment-189116</link>
		<dc:creator>Baddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/13/are-tags-working/#comment-189116</guid>
		<description>As a blogger, I love tags. They bring in a lot of visitors from the search engines as well as Technorati. As a consumer, categories help me more. But that&#039;s how I trained myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a blogger, I love tags. They bring in a lot of visitors from the search engines as well as Technorati. As a consumer, categories help me more. But that&#8217;s how I trained myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

