<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking: Am I a Person Or an Item?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-1022964</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-1022964</guid>
		<description>My friend&#039;s profile claims she has 567 &quot;friends&quot;. That&#039;s impossible! You wouldn&#039;t even have enough time in the year to see them all. Do people add anyone they have ever come into contact with? It&#039;s so stupid. Those sites are supposed to bring people together but really they are just isolating everyone. A profile comment is not the same as a coffee with a friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend&#8217;s profile claims she has 567 &#8220;friends&#8221;. That&#8217;s impossible! You wouldn&#8217;t even have enough time in the year to see them all. Do people add anyone they have ever come into contact with? It&#8217;s so stupid. Those sites are supposed to bring people together but really they are just isolating everyone. A profile comment is not the same as a coffee with a friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what matters (Jello Edition) &#171; chartreuse</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-194857</link>
		<dc:creator>what matters (Jello Edition) &#171; chartreuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-194857</guid>
		<description>[...] The most important thing is knowing what matters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The most important thing is knowing what matters. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mastering the Anecdote</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-192283</link>
		<dc:creator>Mastering the Anecdote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-192283</guid>
		<description>[...] example I want to use is Social Networking: Am I a Person, or an Item? The article begins with a six paragraph anecdote that does not once mention social networking. By [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] example I want to use is Social Networking: Am I a Person, or an Item? The article begins with a six paragraph anecdote that does not once mention social networking. By [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Matheson</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-190052</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Matheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-190052</guid>
		<description>Hi Liz,

Deep thinkers are fast becoming a rarity in our modern world.  You would think this to be a good thing - for the &quot;deep thinkers&quot; that is.  Rarity usually means &quot;high demand&quot;.  Alas, I think not in this case.

Having been in Technology since leaving school some 23 years ago, in theory, I should be a true proponent of it.  However, I am ambivalent toward it.  

Where technology clearly delivers time and labour-savings I am thrilled by it. (Well, not literally but you know what I mean.)  Yet, when we make these huge time savings and it was notionally to increase our QUALITY of LIFE (hopefully as measured by spending more time with people and activities that we love), what do we do with that time?  Give it up to more technology of course!

So, I would agree with you.  For me, I would rather have 2, 3 or 4 friends that I know deeply, intimately, any day than have a hundred people that I dupe myself into calling &quot;friends&quot; (as nice and as pleasant as they are).

Live life. Love Life. Always.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Liz,</p>
<p>Deep thinkers are fast becoming a rarity in our modern world.  You would think this to be a good thing &#8211; for the &#8220;deep thinkers&#8221; that is.  Rarity usually means &#8220;high demand&#8221;.  Alas, I think not in this case.</p>
<p>Having been in Technology since leaving school some 23 years ago, in theory, I should be a true proponent of it.  However, I am ambivalent toward it.  </p>
<p>Where technology clearly delivers time and labour-savings I am thrilled by it. (Well, not literally but you know what I mean.)  Yet, when we make these huge time savings and it was notionally to increase our QUALITY of LIFE (hopefully as measured by spending more time with people and activities that we love), what do we do with that time?  Give it up to more technology of course!</p>
<p>So, I would agree with you.  For me, I would rather have 2, 3 or 4 friends that I know deeply, intimately, any day than have a hundred people that I dupe myself into calling &#8220;friends&#8221; (as nice and as pleasant as they are).</p>
<p>Live life. Love Life. Always.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189936</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189936</guid>
		<description>Hi Jan,
Your last sentence is so powerful. I so agree. Thank you for bringing it here and taking the time to share it. 

Culture enters the picture too. What one culture finds close another might more distant . . . that&#039;s what I can&#039;t seem to say right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jan,<br />
Your last sentence is so powerful. I so agree. Thank you for bringing it here and taking the time to share it. </p>
<p>Culture enters the picture too. What one culture finds close another might more distant . . . that&#8217;s what I can&#8217;t seem to say right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189934</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189934</guid>
		<description>Liz, 

This was sort of what I was trying to get at when commenting on your blog only did I not put it as well as you nor distill my thoughts so clearly beforehand which probably made me chose the wrong starting point.

It is a matter of depth in relation to time, but also as part of my point was, in relation to distance. The internet may enable us to shorten distances, but actually getting closer still takes time. And effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, </p>
<p>This was sort of what I was trying to get at when commenting on your blog only did I not put it as well as you nor distill my thoughts so clearly beforehand which probably made me chose the wrong starting point.</p>
<p>It is a matter of depth in relation to time, but also as part of my point was, in relation to distance. The internet may enable us to shorten distances, but actually getting closer still takes time. And effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189865</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189865</guid>
		<description>Hi Xdroot,
To think, to reflect, to cultivate . . . to mature, to grow, to generate.

I&#039;ve often wondered what Toffler wrote about, but when Future Shock came out . . . the title and the cover made me not want to read the predictions that he was making. I guess I&#039;m glad I didn&#039;t. 

It&#039;s sad the way we make each other invisible. We talk on our cell phones in elevators and invade another&#039;s space as if the other person isn&#039;t there. We say, &quot;I&#039;m sorry but, I&#039;m in a mood so gimme that.&quot; Yes. That&#039;s what I heard yesterday. We don&#039;t hear each other or ourselves anymore, because we don&#039;t know how to still ourselves to listen. 

To breathe. to aspire. to inspire. to wonder. The empty calories of small talk connections are sad when I think of the rich texture of stilling ourselves to hear the sounds of what we could be saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Xdroot,<br />
To think, to reflect, to cultivate . . . to mature, to grow, to generate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often wondered what Toffler wrote about, but when Future Shock came out . . . the title and the cover made me not want to read the predictions that he was making. I guess I&#8217;m glad I didn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad the way we make each other invisible. We talk on our cell phones in elevators and invade another&#8217;s space as if the other person isn&#8217;t there. We say, &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry but, I&#8217;m in a mood so gimme that.&#8221; Yes. That&#8217;s what I heard yesterday. We don&#8217;t hear each other or ourselves anymore, because we don&#8217;t know how to still ourselves to listen. </p>
<p>To breathe. to aspire. to inspire. to wonder. The empty calories of small talk connections are sad when I think of the rich texture of stilling ourselves to hear the sounds of what we could be saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xdroot</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189864</link>
		<dc:creator>Xdroot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189864</guid>
		<description>Liz, I completely agree with you on this. It&#039;s a shame that we have become a fast-food content &amp; relationship culture. Alvin Toffler talked about this change in his books Future Shock &amp; Third Wave. 

I&#039;ve noticed this trend over the last decade not just through media but also through the teens who do. Kids that aren&#039;t hooked to the net/tv/ seem more capable of engaging in deeper conversations than a net-connected kid. I spend more time with the latter, having to lay foundations that should have been laid much earlier.

Unfortunately, to allow people to think, to reflect, to cultivate relationships requires a society that isn&#039;t hooked on the &quot;More-is-Better &amp; Faster-is-Better&quot; philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, I completely agree with you on this. It&#8217;s a shame that we have become a fast-food content &amp; relationship culture. Alvin Toffler talked about this change in his books Future Shock &amp; Third Wave. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed this trend over the last decade not just through media but also through the teens who do. Kids that aren&#8217;t hooked to the net/tv/ seem more capable of engaging in deeper conversations than a net-connected kid. I spend more time with the latter, having to lay foundations that should have been laid much earlier.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, to allow people to think, to reflect, to cultivate relationships requires a society that isn&#8217;t hooked on the &#8220;More-is-Better &amp; Faster-is-Better&#8221; philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189849</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189849</guid>
		<description>Hi Webomatica,
I&#039;ve found that the 80/20 rule works there as well. The connections are few that get the opportunity to go deep. And the immediacy of a reason has to be present for the depth to catch fire in most cases is what I seem to be observing. 

The potential is great, but the fact is that we just can&#039;t know everyone -- just as we can&#039;t read every feed. Yet so many are still determined to try to. 

I don&#039;t know where you are, but I&#039;m finding the why . . . why is often disappearing from much of the discussions as we move to &quot;how-to&quot; and what. And frankly the what is faster and easier. 

That&#039;s why I&#039;m narrowing a bit to manage myself and my profile. Quality, Schedule, Budget seems to apply in real life too. I&#039;m  choosing for quality. It&#039;s sounds like you&#039;re looking to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Webomatica,<br />
I&#8217;ve found that the 80/20 rule works there as well. The connections are few that get the opportunity to go deep. And the immediacy of a reason has to be present for the depth to catch fire in most cases is what I seem to be observing. </p>
<p>The potential is great, but the fact is that we just can&#8217;t know everyone &#8212; just as we can&#8217;t read every feed. Yet so many are still determined to try to. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where you are, but I&#8217;m finding the why . . . why is often disappearing from much of the discussions as we move to &#8220;how-to&#8221; and what. And frankly the what is faster and easier. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m narrowing a bit to manage myself and my profile. Quality, Schedule, Budget seems to apply in real life too. I&#8217;m  choosing for quality. It&#8217;s sounds like you&#8217;re looking to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189847</link>
		<dc:creator>Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189847</guid>
		<description>Interesting observations and points. I find that there is great potential in making connections through new social sites. However there also is the temptation for people to equate more = better, meaning as many little square avatars as possible. But there must be a human limit before one is spread too thin, and the resulting connections too superficial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observations and points. I find that there is great potential in making connections through new social sites. However there also is the temptation for people to equate more = better, meaning as many little square avatars as possible. But there must be a human limit before one is spread too thin, and the resulting connections too superficial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189839</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189839</guid>
		<description>Franky,
Don&#039;t misunderstand. Those nice things are still nice things and poking is fun too. Yes. 

But when there&#039;s no substance between &quot;Hi, how are you?&quot; and &quot;Have a nice evening.&quot; with &lt;i&gt; the majority &lt;/i&gt; of folks I meet, I find there&#039;s no real relationship. I&#039;m just a face, a person on a list. I want to know people more than that. 

I&#039;m interested in what they think -- ideas, feelings, experiences -- like what you wrote in your comment. That&#039;s the real thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franky,<br />
Don&#8217;t misunderstand. Those nice things are still nice things and poking is fun too. Yes. </p>
<p>But when there&#8217;s no substance between &#8220;Hi, how are you?&#8221; and &#8220;Have a nice evening.&#8221; with <i> the majority </i> of folks I meet, I find there&#8217;s no real relationship. I&#8217;m just a face, a person on a list. I want to know people more than that. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in what they think &#8212; ideas, feelings, experiences &#8212; like what you wrote in your comment. That&#8217;s the real thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franky</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189838</link>
		<dc:creator>franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189838</guid>
		<description>This one hurts, it really does. Only some weeks ago I was at a seminar about managing sales people. One of the speakers rehearsed the standard &lt;em&gt;niceties&lt;/em&gt; and as much a people love to stress the &#039;Hi, how are you&#039; I missed a thing.

Actually it&#039;s a pet peeve of mine and everytime I managed a new bar team it was the first rule, after greeting the guests. 
Notice when people leave and thank them (vocally and the whole team) for their visit. Wish them a nice day/evening.

And what do I do nowadays, online? I poke people all day long and return the pokes whenever I have a second. D&#039;uh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one hurts, it really does. Only some weeks ago I was at a seminar about managing sales people. One of the speakers rehearsed the standard <em>niceties</em> and as much a people love to stress the &#8216;Hi, how are you&#8217; I missed a thing.</p>
<p>Actually it&#8217;s a pet peeve of mine and everytime I managed a new bar team it was the first rule, after greeting the guests.<br />
Notice when people leave and thank them (vocally and the whole team) for their visit. Wish them a nice day/evening.</p>
<p>And what do I do nowadays, online? I poke people all day long and return the pokes whenever I have a second. D&#8217;uh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189828</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189828</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Karin! I&#039;m with you. The &quot;hi, how are you?&quot; surface interaction is only so beneficial. Real quality of relationship takes real interaction. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Karin! I&#8217;m with you. The &#8220;hi, how are you?&#8221; surface interaction is only so beneficial. Real quality of relationship takes real interaction. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karin H.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189820</link>
		<dc:creator>Karin H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189820</guid>
		<description>Agree with that. 
A trade-show is nice to do (been there, done it), but the best thing from a trade show is getting to know the passers-by better, not just handing out a leaflet, card. Really engage them - or them you - into a real conversation is much nicer, more rewarding ;-) (with or without &#039;trade-profit&#039;)

Karin H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with that.<br />
A trade-show is nice to do (been there, done it), but the best thing from a trade show is getting to know the passers-by better, not just handing out a leaflet, card. Really engage them &#8211; or them you &#8211; into a real conversation is much nicer, more rewarding ;-) (with or without &#8216;trade-profit&#8217;)</p>
<p>Karin H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189815</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189815</guid>
		<description>Hi Karin!
I was surprised at how long I&#039;ve been blogging without remembering this conversation I had in 1997. It so worried me then and yet here I&#039;ve gotten with the rest of us now. . . . 140 characters are fun, but it&#039;s like a trade show some folks think they&#039;re reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Karin!<br />
I was surprised at how long I&#8217;ve been blogging without remembering this conversation I had in 1997. It so worried me then and yet here I&#8217;ve gotten with the rest of us now. . . . 140 characters are fun, but it&#8217;s like a trade show some folks think they&#8217;re reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karin H.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189812</link>
		<dc:creator>Karin H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189812</guid>
		<description>Hi Liz

&lt;blockquote&gt;I worried that kids wouldn’t learn to enjoy the connections of thinking long and deep.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m with you on this, how can lists or 140 characters teach you how to connect in real life, in real deeper growing friendships and relationships? We need depth, sharing, time and patience for that - no instant bits and bytes, or how-to-do lists. That&#039;s just ticking boxes, not experiencing the joy of connecting - learning &#039;how to&#039; the hard and meaningful way.

Karin H. (Keep It Simple Sweetheart, specially in business)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Liz</p>
<blockquote><p>I worried that kids wouldn’t learn to enjoy the connections of thinking long and deep.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on this, how can lists or 140 characters teach you how to connect in real life, in real deeper growing friendships and relationships? We need depth, sharing, time and patience for that &#8211; no instant bits and bytes, or how-to-do lists. That&#8217;s just ticking boxes, not experiencing the joy of connecting &#8211; learning &#8216;how to&#8217; the hard and meaningful way.</p>
<p>Karin H. (Keep It Simple Sweetheart, specially in business)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blog Herald: Social Networking &#8212; Am I Person Or an Item? - Liz Strauss at Successful Blog - Thinking, writing, business ideas . . . You&#8217;re only a stranger once.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/comment-page-1/#comment-189809</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blog Herald: Social Networking &#8212; Am I Person Or an Item? - Liz Strauss at Successful Blog - Thinking, writing, business ideas . . . You&#8217;re only a stranger once.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/07/24/social-networking-am-i-person-or-an-item/#comment-189809</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s about blogging and real life. &#8211;ME &#8220;Liz&#8221; Strauss I wrote at the Blog Herald about books, information, and relationships, making connections from the patterns she sees. I consider these keystone articles. Authenticity and Transparency in the Real World In the Real World — The Half-Full, Half-Empty Glass The Universe of People, Black Holes, and Stars Connectors and Mavens on the Tipping Point The Writer’s Dilemma and the Blogger’s Secret The Two Webs: Information or Relationships? Social Networking: Am I Person Or an Item? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s about blogging and real life. &#8211;ME &#8220;Liz&#8221; Strauss I wrote at the Blog Herald about books, information, and relationships, making connections from the patterns she sees. I consider these keystone articles. Authenticity and Transparency in the Real World In the Real World — The Half-Full, Half-Empty Glass The Universe of People, Black Holes, and Stars Connectors and Mavens on the Tipping Point The Writer’s Dilemma and the Blogger’s Secret The Two Webs: Information or Relationships? Social Networking: Am I Person Or an Item? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

