<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright Cases to Watch: Lenz v. Universal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hermes Online Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-1126096</link>
		<dc:creator>Hermes Online Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/#comment-1126096</guid>
		<description>You’re so cool! I don’t suppose I’ve read anything similar to this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. Really thank you for starting this up. This website is an issue that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. Useful job for bringing something new to the internet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re so cool! I don’t suppose I’ve read anything similar to this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. Really thank you for starting this up. This website is an issue that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. Useful job for bringing something new to the internet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video Players and Implied License &#124; PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-1117863</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Players and Implied License &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/#comment-1117863</guid>
		<description>[...] a lot of this on YouTube where clips are routinely pulled down for containing infringing material, some of it dubiously, and YouTube&#8217;s content matching system is getting a serious test of its effectiveness as the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a lot of this on YouTube where clips are routinely pulled down for containing infringing material, some of it dubiously, and YouTube&#8217;s content matching system is getting a serious test of its effectiveness as the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updates: Copyright Cases to Watch &#124; The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-729806</link>
		<dc:creator>Updates: Copyright Cases to Watch &#124; The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/#comment-729806</guid>
		<description>[...] discussed in the original article on the case, there were many questions raised by the lawsuit, the first of which being fair use of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussed in the original article on the case, there were many questions raised by the lawsuit, the first of which being fair use of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copycense &#187; Copycense Clippings (Oct. 2 to Oct. 8, 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-220037</link>
		<dc:creator>Copycense &#187; Copycense Clippings (Oct. 2 to Oct. 8, 2007)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/#comment-220037</guid>
		<description>[...] Bailey. Copyright Cases to Watch: Lenz v. Universal. The Blog Herald. Oct. 8, 2007. We disagree: this is not a case to watch; it is a case that begs to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bailey. Copyright Cases to Watch: Lenz v. Universal. The Blog Herald. Oct. 8, 2007. We disagree: this is not a case to watch; it is a case that begs to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-219261</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/#comment-219261</guid>
		<description>Youtube must be sweating this one big time They&#039;d have to dump tons of their content if the music industry folks win and they go after them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube must be sweating this one big time They&#8217;d have to dump tons of their content if the music industry folks win and they go after them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack @ The Tech Teapot</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/comment-page-1/#comment-219160</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack @ The Tech Teapot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/#comment-219160</guid>
		<description>Gee, you&#039;d have thought Universal would have let this one pass. I can understand them going after people who&#039;ve made a commercial gain, but a background tune on a 30 second baby video...please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, you&#8217;d have thought Universal would have let this one pass. I can understand them going after people who&#8217;ve made a commercial gain, but a background tune on a 30 second baby video&#8230;please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

