<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye to Splogs and Feed-Driven Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-454918</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-454918</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-454642&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Salif&lt;/a&gt;:

Copyright notices aren&#039;t tacky, and they don&#039;t stop anything. They merely serve to remind the person reading and using the content that there is a copyright on the content, but it doesn&#039;t define what the copyright entails. &lt;em&gt;Everything&lt;/em&gt; published on the web is copyrighted. The level of permission for use changes depending upon the desires of the copyright owner. Ask first. Though few do.

How were these scrapers stopped? They were asked. If they did not respond, they were sent DMCA notices, search engines were notified as were advertisers. They stopped. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/04/10/what-do-you-do-when-someone-steals-your-content/&quot; title=&quot;What Do You Do When Someone Steals Your Content&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What Do You Do When Someone Steals Your Content&lt;/a&gt; for more specifics.

Sploggers do more harm than good from EVERY angle. They clutter the web, they waste people&#039;s time, the links they give back suck with the inclusion of TrustRank in Google PageRank, and they make money from our work, often when we cannot make money directly from our own work, such as my blog on WordPress.com. It is in our best interest to stop scrapers and sploggers everywhere, whether they copy us or someone else.

Thanks for caring about this issue. More people need to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-454642" rel="nofollow">Salif</a>:</p>
<p>Copyright notices aren&#8217;t tacky, and they don&#8217;t stop anything. They merely serve to remind the person reading and using the content that there is a copyright on the content, but it doesn&#8217;t define what the copyright entails. <em>Everything</em> published on the web is copyrighted. The level of permission for use changes depending upon the desires of the copyright owner. Ask first. Though few do.</p>
<p>How were these scrapers stopped? They were asked. If they did not respond, they were sent DMCA notices, search engines were notified as were advertisers. They stopped. See <a href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/04/10/what-do-you-do-when-someone-steals-your-content/" title="What Do You Do When Someone Steals Your Content" rel="nofollow">What Do You Do When Someone Steals Your Content</a> for more specifics.</p>
<p>Sploggers do more harm than good from EVERY angle. They clutter the web, they waste people&#8217;s time, the links they give back suck with the inclusion of TrustRank in Google PageRank, and they make money from our work, often when we cannot make money directly from our own work, such as my blog on WordPress.com. It is in our best interest to stop scrapers and sploggers everywhere, whether they copy us or someone else.</p>
<p>Thanks for caring about this issue. More people need to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salif</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-454642</link>
		<dc:creator>Salif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-454642</guid>
		<description>Maybe I missed something, but how did you stop them from using your feed? I&#039;d like to do that. I put copyright notices in my feed, but that looks tacky when the displayed on the sites that I set the feed up for (Google, Technorati...) in the first place.

I didn&#039;t realize just how bad these splogs were until content from one of my sites stopped being indexed, but the splogs that displayed my content *were* indexed. I was fuming! I think I was penalized because of this, too. Maybe Google penalized for duplicate content? I don&#039;t know. Either way, I contacted their advertisers. :D

Andrew Anderson, I don&#039;t think she&#039;s overreacting. And, why should she have to wait for Akismet to finally catch up? By the way, I&#039;m still receiving the same type of comments, so she would have been waiting a long time, wouldn&#039;t she?

The sploggers may not take away her readers, but the point (to me, anyway) is that they are making money off of her work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I missed something, but how did you stop them from using your feed? I&#8217;d like to do that. I put copyright notices in my feed, but that looks tacky when the displayed on the sites that I set the feed up for (Google, Technorati&#8230;) in the first place.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t realize just how bad these splogs were until content from one of my sites stopped being indexed, but the splogs that displayed my content *were* indexed. I was fuming! I think I was penalized because of this, too. Maybe Google penalized for duplicate content? I don&#8217;t know. Either way, I contacted their advertisers. :D</p>
<p>Andrew Anderson, I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s overreacting. And, why should she have to wait for Akismet to finally catch up? By the way, I&#8217;m still receiving the same type of comments, so she would have been waiting a long time, wouldn&#8217;t she?</p>
<p>The sploggers may not take away her readers, but the point (to me, anyway) is that they are making money off of her work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew A. Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-397978</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew A. Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-397978</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you need to be a little more patient. The akismet/wordpress community will figure this thing out.  And as the blogosphere and search landscapes increasingly incorporate semantic technologies, links alone or text strings alone will no longer be  as valuable.  SEO, for the most part is unsustainable (beyond simply using metadata the way it was intended to be used). Who knows what future techniques spammers will come up with.  It&#039;s out of our control.  

As for your copyright manifesto, don&#039;t you think you&#039;re being a little bit 1980?  
Evertything is derivative work.  And everything is already copied if only by search engines, our routers and web browsers.  If you&#039;ve been blogging for 14 years, I assume you&#039;ve had a few moments of inspiration in which you&#039;ve seen where this cloud of discussion is heading.  

I say lighten up, friend.  You&#039;re value here is your influence on others, your social currency etc.  No spammer or &quot;plagiarist&quot; can take away the network of friends and readers you have built. 

If you&#039;re really convinced that you own your piece of the conversation, then password-protect your site. You wouldn&#039;t want anyone crawling it and making money off of excerpting it.  Actually, why not make your site all image-based so the words can&#039;t be copied or detected at all by bots? I&#039;m just trying to make a point.  You can&#039;t have your cake and eat it too.  Google profits from copying your content.  Wordpress does.  Technorati does.  And you benefit from them.  So the blogger bots are annoying, so what?  They&#039;ll fade out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you need to be a little more patient. The akismet/wordpress community will figure this thing out.  And as the blogosphere and search landscapes increasingly incorporate semantic technologies, links alone or text strings alone will no longer be  as valuable.  SEO, for the most part is unsustainable (beyond simply using metadata the way it was intended to be used). Who knows what future techniques spammers will come up with.  It&#8217;s out of our control.  </p>
<p>As for your copyright manifesto, don&#8217;t you think you&#8217;re being a little bit 1980?<br />
Evertything is derivative work.  And everything is already copied if only by search engines, our routers and web browsers.  If you&#8217;ve been blogging for 14 years, I assume you&#8217;ve had a few moments of inspiration in which you&#8217;ve seen where this cloud of discussion is heading.  </p>
<p>I say lighten up, friend.  You&#8217;re value here is your influence on others, your social currency etc.  No spammer or &#8220;plagiarist&#8221; can take away the network of friends and readers you have built. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re really convinced that you own your piece of the conversation, then password-protect your site. You wouldn&#8217;t want anyone crawling it and making money off of excerpting it.  Actually, why not make your site all image-based so the words can&#8217;t be copied or detected at all by bots? I&#8217;m just trying to make a point.  You can&#8217;t have your cake and eat it too.  Google profits from copying your content.  WordPress does.  Technorati does.  And you benefit from them.  So the blogger bots are annoying, so what?  They&#8217;ll fade out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google! Clean Up Blogger! Now! : The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-353361</link>
		<dc:creator>Google! Clean Up Blogger! Now! : The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-353361</guid>
		<description>[...] it easier to submit DMCA violators and splogs through a one stop online visit, not a trip to the post office. Make us learn quickly that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it easier to submit DMCA violators and splogs through a one stop online visit, not a trip to the post office. Make us learn quickly that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tired of Pingback Spam &#124; K-Squared Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-269672</link>
		<dc:creator>Tired of Pingback Spam &#124; K-Squared Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-269672</guid>
		<description>[...] deter spammers, and the irony that Google is making money off of them. Meanwhile, the Blog Herald goes into the mechanics and ethics of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deter spammers, and the irony that Google is making money off of them. Meanwhile, the Blog Herald goes into the mechanics and ethics of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Stop Content Theft: The Best Tips &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-268087</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Stop Content Theft: The Best Tips &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-268087</guid>
		<description>[...] Goodbye to Splogs and Feed-Driven Blogs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Goodbye to Splogs and Feed-Driven Blogs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Fredrickson</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-259814</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Fredrickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-259814</guid>
		<description>Lorelle, IANAL but I&#039;m fairly certain fair use does not include replicating a portion of your text for profit, which is what they&#039;re doing. If they were utilizing your text and then providing commentary, then it would be fair use. The context makes a big difference in these things. If they use a portion of your text (or all of it) but provide none of their own text, and then sell ads, I believe that you could pursue that legally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorelle, IANAL but I&#8217;m fairly certain fair use does not include replicating a portion of your text for profit, which is what they&#8217;re doing. If they were utilizing your text and then providing commentary, then it would be fair use. The context makes a big difference in these things. If they use a portion of your text (or all of it) but provide none of their own text, and then sell ads, I believe that you could pursue that legally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219788</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219788</guid>
		<description>@Frederic

Some of these folks are building up page rank on a domain so that they can sell it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Frederic</p>
<p>Some of these folks are building up page rank on a domain so that they can sell it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglehawk</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219601</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglehawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219601</guid>
		<description>Lorelle,
  I asked Automattic, and they said they were not capable of doing such thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorelle,<br />
  I asked Automattic, and they said they were not capable of doing such thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219584</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219584</guid>
		<description>Akismet takes care of most of the splogs that try this with my blog. Today, I got five trackbacks from ideahustle.com, but they were shut down just a few hours later because they didn&#039;t pay their bills, it seems.

What I can&#039;t figure out is what the reason for this is. Most of the splogs don&#039;t even seem to have any advertisement on them, yet it is become more and more of a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Akismet takes care of most of the splogs that try this with my blog. Today, I got five trackbacks from ideahustle.com, but they were shut down just a few hours later because they didn&#8217;t pay their bills, it seems.</p>
<p>What I can&#8217;t figure out is what the reason for this is. Most of the splogs don&#8217;t even seem to have any advertisement on them, yet it is become more and more of a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Archive : Pingback Spam, Popularity and Protecting Investments &#187; Masters of Media</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219529</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Archive : Pingback Spam, Popularity and Protecting Investments &#187; Masters of Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219529</guid>
		<description>[...] many have had enough of being this popular, and at least one blogger has issued a warning to the spammers saying they&#8217;re no longer welcome. Like anyone, like Google, she&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many have had enough of being this popular, and at least one blogger has issued a warning to the spammers saying they&#8217;re no longer welcome. Like anyone, like Google, she&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Angelo Racoma</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219377</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219377</guid>
		<description>Raj,

LOL! I almost sent your comment to the spam bin. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raj,</p>
<p>LOL! I almost sent your comment to the spam bin. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablopabla</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219349</link>
		<dc:creator>pablopabla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219349</guid>
		<description>Oh, I hate these splogs too. They are nothing but useless sites. I would have loved to be able to just chew on them like spam. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I hate these splogs too. They are nothing but useless sites. I would have loved to be able to just chew on them like spam. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Url</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219328</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Url</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219328</guid>
		<description>I’m glad that you are all on my side. I say NO TO SPLOGS ON MY BLOGS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m glad that you are all on my side. I say NO TO SPLOGS ON MY BLOGS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219319</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219319</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219242&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eaglehawk&lt;/a&gt;:

Receive reports? Why not get your company to hook up with Automattic Akismet to get their help in targeting those who use their web hosting facilities. I&#039;m sure they could figure out how to work together to shut these types of sites down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219242" rel="nofollow">eaglehawk</a>:</p>
<p>Receive reports? Why not get your company to hook up with Automattic Akismet to get their help in targeting those who use their web hosting facilities. I&#8217;m sure they could figure out how to work together to shut these types of sites down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglehawk</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219242</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglehawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219242</guid>
		<description>All,
  At my day_job, I work in the Policy enforcement arena for a large webhosting company.  I know that webhosting providers are starting to frown on this sort of activity.  I also know that webhosting providers (the more respectable ones) actively fighting comment spam, we just wish we could receive more reports of it.  As far as on my own blog, I&#039;ve been throwing these to the spam pile any time I can, and reporting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All,<br />
  At my day_job, I work in the Policy enforcement arena for a large webhosting company.  I know that webhosting providers are starting to frown on this sort of activity.  I also know that webhosting providers (the more respectable ones) actively fighting comment spam, we just wish we could receive more reports of it.  As far as on my own blog, I&#8217;ve been throwing these to the spam pile any time I can, and reporting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raj</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219201</link>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219201</guid>
		<description>Lorelle wrote a interesting post today....

Just kidding. When you said &quot;these twits&quot; above, I snorted, as I suddenly had a Monty Python-style vision of the boys on the Internet, setting up blogs. [Remember the skit where they had The Twit Races? Stupid twit, he ran himself over.]

If it weren&#039;t annoying, however, it&#039;d all be so hilarous. And why should these twits care? They&#039;re only in it for the money. Scruples hardly matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorelle wrote a interesting post today&#8230;.</p>
<p>Just kidding. When you said &#8220;these twits&#8221; above, I snorted, as I suddenly had a Monty Python-style vision of the boys on the Internet, setting up blogs. [Remember the skit where they had The Twit Races? Stupid twit, he ran himself over.]</p>
<p>If it weren&#8217;t annoying, however, it&#8217;d all be so hilarous. And why should these twits care? They&#8217;re only in it for the money. Scruples hardly matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cerebralmum</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219108</link>
		<dc:creator>cerebralmum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219108</guid>
		<description>When I logged into my blog 5 minutes ago, I had two of these in my comments list, and one caught by Akismet.  This was the first time I had seen it and I had just opened &lt;a href=&quot;http://lorelle.wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lorelle on Wordpress&lt;/a&gt; to check whether I should list them as spam or just delete them when I looked at my feed.

It seems that you not only provide the answer to nearly every question a new blogger might have, you provide them in real time.

Synchronicity is a funny thing.

Thanks, Lorelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I logged into my blog 5 minutes ago, I had two of these in my comments list, and one caught by Akismet.  This was the first time I had seen it and I had just opened <a href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">Lorelle on WordPress</a> to check whether I should list them as spam or just delete them when I looked at my feed.</p>
<p>It seems that you not only provide the answer to nearly every question a new blogger might have, you provide them in real time.</p>
<p>Synchronicity is a funny thing.</p>
<p>Thanks, Lorelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219190</link>
		<dc:creator>Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219190</guid>
		<description>I delete these sorts of trackbacks as well. I&#039;ve started checking out the commenter&#039;s site and if it&#039;s a splog I delete or mark as spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I delete these sorts of trackbacks as well. I&#8217;ve started checking out the commenter&#8217;s site and if it&#8217;s a splog I delete or mark as spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219152</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219152</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219122&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pelf&lt;/a&gt;:

Marking as spam sufficient? What else do you want to do? Drive a truck over their heads? Yes, that&#039;s enough.

&lt;strong&gt;cerebralmum:&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks for the kind words, but don&#039;t always check my site for the answers. :D Trust your instincts and check the link if you doubt the veracity of the comment. And kill all spammers and sploggers - ah, their comments specifically.

&lt;strong&gt;Wayne:&lt;/strong&gt; Yes, gadgetgadget is a new notorious splog. These keep coming in faster than we can blow them out of the water. Stomp them all as spam.

&lt;strong&gt;Jamie:&lt;/strong&gt; There are a lot of myths about comment spam and comment spam prevention techniques out there, and what people don&#039;t seem to get is that there are brilliant minds behind this time-wasting crap. They are coming up with ways to get comment spam and trackback spam onto your blog that boggle the brain. Targeted comment spam has been around for a while, but the human spammers are the hardest ones to detect without a visit to the site they reference. And even then....

I&#039;m glad that you are all on my side. I say NO TO SPLOGS ON MY BLOGS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219122" rel="nofollow">pelf</a>:</p>
<p>Marking as spam sufficient? What else do you want to do? Drive a truck over their heads? Yes, that&#8217;s enough.</p>
<p><strong>cerebralmum:</strong> Thanks for the kind words, but don&#8217;t always check my site for the answers. :D Trust your instincts and check the link if you doubt the veracity of the comment. And kill all spammers and sploggers &#8211; ah, their comments specifically.</p>
<p><strong>Wayne:</strong> Yes, gadgetgadget is a new notorious splog. These keep coming in faster than we can blow them out of the water. Stomp them all as spam.</p>
<p><strong>Jamie:</strong> There are a lot of myths about comment spam and comment spam prevention techniques out there, and what people don&#8217;t seem to get is that there are brilliant minds behind this time-wasting crap. They are coming up with ways to get comment spam and trackback spam onto your blog that boggle the brain. Targeted comment spam has been around for a while, but the human spammers are the hardest ones to detect without a visit to the site they reference. And even then&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that you are all on my side. I say NO TO SPLOGS ON MY BLOGS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pelf</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219122</link>
		<dc:creator>pelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219122</guid>
		<description>I received a lot of those trackbacks lately, and I was going to ask you what I could do with them! =)

So is marking them as spam suffice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received a lot of those trackbacks lately, and I was going to ask you what I could do with them! =)</p>
<p>So is marking them as spam suffice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Liew</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219093</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Liew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219093</guid>
		<description>I guess the gadgetgadget.info above me is such sites as well. I get these pingbacks everyday and thanks to Akismet, they are all under control. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the gadgetgadget.info above me is such sites as well. I get these pingbacks everyday and thanks to Akismet, they are all under control. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-219081</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/goodbye-to-splogs-and-feed-driven-blogs/#comment-219081</guid>
		<description>I had this exact experience Saturday, Lorelle.  My little corner of nowhere is a techie journal of stuff I cook up on the side, yadda yadda.  So, I happened to put up a post Saturday about developing OSX widgets.  I mentioned that eyePhone and eyePod touche (spellings mangled on purpose) use the same basic tech.  About 20 seconds later the ol&#039; spam comments started blowing in.  Akismet wasn&#039;t turned on for that blog but it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this exact experience Saturday, Lorelle.  My little corner of nowhere is a techie journal of stuff I cook up on the side, yadda yadda.  So, I happened to put up a post Saturday about developing OSX widgets.  I mentioned that eyePhone and eyePod touche (spellings mangled on purpose) use the same basic tech.  About 20 seconds later the ol&#8217; spam comments started blowing in.  Akismet wasn&#8217;t turned on for that blog but it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

