<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright Cases to Watch: Viacom v. YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse James</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1105763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 03:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/#comment-1105763</guid>
		<description>It is always interesting to see how the courts decide media vs. &quot;the people&quot; cases.

Thanks for the posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always interesting to see how the courts decide media vs. &#8220;the people&#8221; cases.</p>
<p>Thanks for the posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-229246</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/#comment-229246</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been covering this case at Tech LawForum, and just added video of a panel discussion that goes into detail about the DMCA Section 512 &quot;Safe Harbor&quot; provisions and their applicability to the Viacom v. YouTube case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been covering this case at Tech LawForum, and just added video of a panel discussion that goes into detail about the DMCA Section 512 &#8220;Safe Harbor&#8221; provisions and their applicability to the Viacom v. YouTube case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beaches, Badu And The Bible (The Mid-Day Remix Of What You Missed) &#171; chartreuse</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-223004</link>
		<dc:creator>Beaches, Badu And The Bible (The Mid-Day Remix Of What You Missed) &#171; chartreuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/#comment-223004</guid>
		<description>[...] A copyright case to watch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A copyright case to watch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Anchor &#187; Viacom Responds To Better YouTube Filtering</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-221776</link>
		<dc:creator>In Anchor &#187; Viacom Responds To Better YouTube Filtering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/#comment-221776</guid>
		<description>[...] Bailey thinks the Viacom suit against Google will never go to a jury.&quot; Most likely, as the case moves [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bailey thinks the Viacom suit against Google will never go to a jury.&quot; Most likely, as the case moves [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Optimization and Internet Marketing Service &#187; New YouTube Piracy Fighter</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-221683</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Optimization and Internet Marketing Service &#187; New YouTube Piracy Fighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/15/copyright-cases-to-watch-viacom-v-youtube/#comment-221683</guid>
		<description>[...] I was wondering how Google would survive from not being sued for copyright infringements when they purchased YouTube, video-sharing Web site. Take a look at: Copyright Cases to Watch: Viacom v. YouTube [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was wondering how Google would survive from not being sued for copyright infringements when they purchased YouTube, video-sharing Web site. Take a look at: Copyright Cases to Watch: Viacom v. YouTube [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

