<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Spam-Friendly is Your Niche?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-369371</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/#comment-369371</guid>
		<description>Matthew: I&#039;m sorry to hear that. I hope that you&#039;re able to find a way to re-enable comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew: I&#8217;m sorry to hear that. I hope that you&#8217;re able to find a way to re-enable comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-369239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/#comment-369239</guid>
		<description>I agree on my blog it actually got so bad I had to stop allowing comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on my blog it actually got so bad I had to stop allowing comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-369093</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/#comment-369093</guid>
		<description>Lorelle: I&#039;m not going to ask what you were doing posting something with &quot;horse sex&quot; in the title and pretend I didn&#039;t just read that. I&#039;m sure it was a very good reason but it is too early in the morning for me on that front.

However, I&#039;m glad to see that I&#039;m not the only one that&#039;s seen that. Also, I think that your point about attracting the wrong kind of attention is very valid here. 

That&#039;s a great article and I wish I had thought of it in this light, I can see how it would impact this. Of course, this means that the experts get still more scraping so it isn&#039;t all great for them :)

Anyway, thanks for the comment and I look forward to seeing you in Dallas!

Lee: That&#039;s a pretty low number truth be told. Is that just spam getting through or spam total? I&#039;m just curious. 

Thank you for replying!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorelle: I&#8217;m not going to ask what you were doing posting something with &#8220;horse sex&#8221; in the title and pretend I didn&#8217;t just read that. I&#8217;m sure it was a very good reason but it is too early in the morning for me on that front.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m glad to see that I&#8217;m not the only one that&#8217;s seen that. Also, I think that your point about attracting the wrong kind of attention is very valid here. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great article and I wish I had thought of it in this light, I can see how it would impact this. Of course, this means that the experts get still more scraping so it isn&#8217;t all great for them :)</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for the comment and I look forward to seeing you in Dallas!</p>
<p>Lee: That&#8217;s a pretty low number truth be told. Is that just spam getting through or spam total? I&#8217;m just curious. </p>
<p>Thank you for replying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-368962</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/#comment-368962</guid>
		<description>My blog is about video games and I get about 1 spam  a week. However, at one time, I got 12 spam comments and they&#039;re all the same message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My blog is about video games and I get about 1 spam  a week. However, at one time, I got 12 spam comments and they&#8217;re all the same message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-368799</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/#comment-368799</guid>
		<description>There is no doubt that auto-splogging and spamming bots are using keywords to target blog posts. Let me tell you the story some day of an article I wrote with &quot;horse sex&quot; in the title and content...it&#039;s a never ending source for comment spam and traffic, though I&#039;m sure the traffic never sticks around very long. There are no pictures on the blog post. :D

This has been going on for years. Yes, while the more incoming links your blog has the greater the number of comment spam, targeted comment spam follows keywords. 

I wrote about the struggle of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogherald.com/2008/02/04/give-back-to-blog-experts/&quot; title=&quot;Give Back To Blog Experts&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;posts that attract the &quot;wrong&quot; kind of attention&lt;/a&gt; and what to do about them recently. Part of the classification of &quot;wrong&quot; is the high maintenance of such keyword-attractive blog posts. Until I closed comments on that post, I had to clean out 2-25 comment spams a day on it. Too much work for no return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt that auto-splogging and spamming bots are using keywords to target blog posts. Let me tell you the story some day of an article I wrote with &#8220;horse sex&#8221; in the title and content&#8230;it&#8217;s a never ending source for comment spam and traffic, though I&#8217;m sure the traffic never sticks around very long. There are no pictures on the blog post. :D</p>
<p>This has been going on for years. Yes, while the more incoming links your blog has the greater the number of comment spam, targeted comment spam follows keywords. </p>
<p>I wrote about the struggle of <a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/02/04/give-back-to-blog-experts/" title="Give Back To Blog Experts" rel="nofollow">posts that attract the &#8220;wrong&#8221; kind of attention</a> and what to do about them recently. Part of the classification of &#8220;wrong&#8221; is the high maintenance of such keyword-attractive blog posts. Until I closed comments on that post, I had to clean out 2-25 comment spams a day on it. Too much work for no return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-368722</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/#comment-368722</guid>
		<description>Jeremy: I&#039;ve actually had a bit of personal experience with that. A while back I wrote a story on &quot;Porn and Piracy&quot; and the item was not only scraped heavily due to the topic, but also subjected to a major linkblog attack. Other posts with similar link counts have not seen a similar spam comment wave.

It could just be my site, but I do think it plays at least a small roll. Not as big as it does with scraping, but a small one. It is still worth noting at least...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy: I&#8217;ve actually had a bit of personal experience with that. A while back I wrote a story on &#8220;Porn and Piracy&#8221; and the item was not only scraped heavily due to the topic, but also subjected to a major linkblog attack. Other posts with similar link counts have not seen a similar spam comment wave.</p>
<p>It could just be my site, but I do think it plays at least a small roll. Not as big as it does with scraping, but a small one. It is still worth noting at least&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/comment-page-1/#comment-368400</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/17/how-spam-friendly-is-your-niche/#comment-368400</guid>
		<description>The only thing I disagree with is &quot;Increased Comment Spam&quot;. 

I think that has much more to do with how many incoming links your blog has than what your niche is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I disagree with is &#8220;Increased Comment Spam&#8221;. </p>
<p>I think that has much more to do with how many incoming links your blog has than what your niche is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

