<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Way to Hijack Blogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Marshall &#124; Martial Development</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-371694</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Marshall &#124; Martial Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/#comment-371694</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sparkleware.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SuperBot&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (a superior alternative product) for years.  

I&#039;d say they are good for bloggers, because you can save reference material, ensuring it is available when and where you need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using <b><a href="http://www.sparkleware.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">SuperBot</a></b> (a superior alternative product) for years.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say they are good for bloggers, because you can save reference material, ensuring it is available when and where you need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timethief</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-370414</link>
		<dc:creator>timethief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/#comment-370414</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m aware that these tools exist. On my personal blog on my domain I watched as someone used such a program to steal my blog contents and later I saw the contents published on a splog as though they belonged to someone else. 

I took the route of making a DMCA complaint and the web hosting company powering the splog in question and they shut it down. However, this does not prevent them from doing it again and I lack the time and energy to spend on tracing these content thieves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m aware that these tools exist. On my personal blog on my domain I watched as someone used such a program to steal my blog contents and later I saw the contents published on a splog as though they belonged to someone else. </p>
<p>I took the route of making a DMCA complaint and the web hosting company powering the splog in question and they shut it down. However, this does not prevent them from doing it again and I lack the time and energy to spend on tracing these content thieves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaymin Patel</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-369826</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaymin Patel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/#comment-369826</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d do it this way.

Add any blog&#039;s feed to your google reader and use google gears for offline browsing. how is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d do it this way.</p>
<p>Add any blog&#8217;s feed to your google reader and use google gears for offline browsing. how is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-369821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/#comment-369821</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll change anything at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll change anything at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-369815</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/#comment-369815</guid>
		<description>WGET can be a little unreliable when it comes to images in CSS files and such though, or at least it was when I last used it.

I find WinHTTrack a better option for Windows, which has a lot more configuration and is UI-based — it&#039;s also completely dedicated to getting a reliable copy of websites with plenty of options for the outputted files, while I believe mirroring sites is more a side-purpose of WGET.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WGET can be a little unreliable when it comes to images in CSS files and such though, or at least it was when I last used it.</p>
<p>I find WinHTTrack a better option for Windows, which has a lot more configuration and is UI-based — it&#8217;s also completely dedicated to getting a reliable copy of websites with plenty of options for the outputted files, while I believe mirroring sites is more a side-purpose of WGET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwall_hp</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-369788</link>
		<dc:creator>redwall_hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/#comment-369788</guid>
		<description>This already exists as part of most Linux distros, I believe. It&#039;s called &quot;wget&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This already exists as part of most Linux distros, I believe. It&#8217;s called &#8220;wget&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-369782</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/21/new-way-to-hijack-blogs/#comment-369782</guid>
		<description>These tools have been around for many many years, and they do make it easy to do as you said, most of the ones I have seen rewrite URLs and code to point local instead of to the web, making them useless for the download and them upload to a new site logic.  Furthermore they do not download the code for a site, just the rendered HTML, so even if they did upload it, the finished product would be a shallow copy of the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These tools have been around for many many years, and they do make it easy to do as you said, most of the ones I have seen rewrite URLs and code to point local instead of to the web, making them useless for the download and them upload to a new site logic.  Furthermore they do not download the code for a site, just the rendered HTML, so even if they did upload it, the finished product would be a shallow copy of the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

