<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear WordPress, A Response To Your Letter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jani</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-390101</link>
		<dc:creator>Jani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-390101</guid>
		<description>The new wordpress certinaly impressed me, if only I had the time to play with the newest versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new wordpress certinaly impressed me, if only I had the time to play with the newest versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rss VURSAKnoktacom &#187; Blog Arşivi &#187; Links for 2008-03-27 [del.icio.us]</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-376566</link>
		<dc:creator>Rss VURSAKnoktacom &#187; Blog Arşivi &#187; Links for 2008-03-27 [del.icio.us]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-376566</guid>
		<description>[...] Dear WordPress, A Response To Your Letter : The Blog Herald wordpress e sitem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dear WordPress, A Response To Your Letter : The Blog Herald wordpress e sitem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Increase Subscribers to Your Blog -- Tips for Increasing the Number of Readers &#124; I'd Rather Be Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-376021</link>
		<dc:creator>Increase Subscribers to Your Blog -- Tips for Increasing the Number of Readers &#124; I'd Rather Be Writing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-376021</guid>
		<description>[...] intriguing titles. I find myself reading posts with interesting titles (for example, Dear WordPress, A Response to Your Letter). Even when the post is outside my category of interest, I&#8217;ll click a clever title out of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] intriguing titles. I find myself reading posts with interesting titles (for example, Dear WordPress, A Response to Your Letter). Even when the post is outside my category of interest, I&#8217;ll click a clever title out of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Santos</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-374398</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-374398</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested in why previous users are so up in arms over the interface. Design wise, if it is colors that you don&#039;t like, then change them. There is an interface that allows you to do that.

Second, there has to be some rule against critiquing an application without formally using it. (I must admit that I&#039;ve violated that rule plenty of times).

I had some dissent about phpBB3, way back when it was in alpha, but was impressed by what the final result was and when I played around with it.

I think users should embrace change, so the &#039;cheese&#039; has moved. I suggest you move with it or at least change it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested in why previous users are so up in arms over the interface. Design wise, if it is colors that you don&#8217;t like, then change them. There is an interface that allows you to do that.</p>
<p>Second, there has to be some rule against critiquing an application without formally using it. (I must admit that I&#8217;ve violated that rule plenty of times).</p>
<p>I had some dissent about phpBB3, way back when it was in alpha, but was impressed by what the final result was and when I played around with it.</p>
<p>I think users should embrace change, so the &#8216;cheese&#8217; has moved. I suggest you move with it or at least change it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-374116</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-374116</guid>
		<description>I agree, it&#039;s not that bad. 

When I first looked at the demo installation that some guy put up, I thought it looked horrible. Way too much padding everywhere, etc. The extranous padding was actually an outstanding ticket in the WordPress development tracker, and has been worked on (and will be tidied up before final release I&#039;m sure).

I&#039;ve installed RC2 and to me the interface is fine. The colour scheme is actually very pleasant after using it for a bit, and I think it was my typically human knee-jerk reaction to change that made me look at it so negatively.

Everything really is laid out a lot better now from a usability perspective. I&#039;ve just built a whole bunch of pages and posts (pages are particularly easier to manage now), and it was a lot easier than with the old interface.

My favourite thing is the way that the stuff is hidden until you activate it for that post, brought in via AJAX when you click &#039;edit&#039; next to the post slug for example.

My concluded opinion: the new interface is a step forward and people will grow to appreciate it once their initial shock and horror passes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, it&#8217;s not that bad. </p>
<p>When I first looked at the demo installation that some guy put up, I thought it looked horrible. Way too much padding everywhere, etc. The extranous padding was actually an outstanding ticket in the WordPress development tracker, and has been worked on (and will be tidied up before final release I&#8217;m sure).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve installed RC2 and to me the interface is fine. The colour scheme is actually very pleasant after using it for a bit, and I think it was my typically human knee-jerk reaction to change that made me look at it so negatively.</p>
<p>Everything really is laid out a lot better now from a usability perspective. I&#8217;ve just built a whole bunch of pages and posts (pages are particularly easier to manage now), and it was a lot easier than with the old interface.</p>
<p>My favourite thing is the way that the stuff is hidden until you activate it for that post, brought in via AJAX when you click &#8216;edit&#8217; next to the post slug for example.</p>
<p>My concluded opinion: the new interface is a step forward and people will grow to appreciate it once their initial shock and horror passes. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LiveCrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-374066</link>
		<dc:creator>LiveCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-374066</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s that bad, I am using it for 2 weeks not, I also was beta tester. 

Yes to be honest there must be few tweeks to be done here and there but overall I like it better then 2.0 . 
It all depends on what kind of wp blog you are running. Bloggers that don&#039;t use media in blog posts I think its not that important, but for someone like me I think multi-media option is the key of blog posting in wp 2.5 :) 

~Sincerely,
~LC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that bad, I am using it for 2 weeks not, I also was beta tester. </p>
<p>Yes to be honest there must be few tweeks to be done here and there but overall I like it better then 2.0 .<br />
It all depends on what kind of wp blog you are running. Bloggers that don&#8217;t use media in blog posts I think its not that important, but for someone like me I think multi-media option is the key of blog posting in wp 2.5 :) </p>
<p>~Sincerely,<br />
~LC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-373950</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-373950</guid>
		<description>I also think the new interface is a bit tacky. I like how you can customize the feeds and such - but I absolutely HATE the overall color scheme and interface. The old one was so much better.

I installed wordpress 2.5 a few days ago on my test server to check if my technorati links plugin was needed anymore. The plugin apparently is no longer needed, so I wrote up a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nusuni.com/blog/2008/03/22/nusuni-technorati-links-and-wordpress-25/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;quick post&lt;/a&gt; about changing the incoming links feed to technorati.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think the new interface is a bit tacky. I like how you can customize the feeds and such &#8211; but I absolutely HATE the overall color scheme and interface. The old one was so much better.</p>
<p>I installed wordpress 2.5 a few days ago on my test server to check if my technorati links plugin was needed anymore. The plugin apparently is no longer needed, so I wrote up a <a href="http://www.nusuni.com/blog/2008/03/22/nusuni-technorati-links-and-wordpress-25/" rel="nofollow">quick post</a> about changing the incoming links feed to technorati.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-373659</link>
		<dc:creator>Armen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-373659</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say anything about 2.5, but I&#039;m looking forward to giving it a run.

I love WordPress too, but I&#039;d love it to be more efficient, like Textpattern. There&#039;s a considerable difference between the two when you compare how much more bandwidth is chewed by WordPress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say anything about 2.5, but I&#8217;m looking forward to giving it a run.</p>
<p>I love WordPress too, but I&#8217;d love it to be more efficient, like Textpattern. There&#8217;s a considerable difference between the two when you compare how much more bandwidth is chewed by WordPress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith Sunglasses &#187; Dear WordPress, A Response To Your Letter</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-373547</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith Sunglasses &#187; Dear WordPress, A Response To Your Letter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-373547</guid>
		<description>[...] Black Phoebe :: Ms. JennHDear WordPress, A Response To Your Letter Dear WordPress, Today I customary your take regarding the infant uploading and shack functionality in WordPress 2.5. I also customary the face threefold (aka 2.5 RC2) but effect not been flourishing to found it ease owed to effect meeter issues. I do revalue your take though, and the walkthrough of the infant &#8230; Read the flooded place from The Blog Herald Tags: WordPress, Features via Blogdigger book wager for d. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Black Phoebe :: Ms. JennHDear WordPress, A Response To Your Letter Dear WordPress, Today I customary your take regarding the infant uploading and shack functionality in WordPress 2.5. I also customary the face threefold (aka 2.5 RC2) but effect not been flourishing to found it ease owed to effect meeter issues. I do revalue your take though, and the walkthrough of the infant &#8230; Read the flooded place from The Blog Herald Tags: WordPress, Features via Blogdigger book wager for d. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jez</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-373462</link>
		<dc:creator>jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/27/dear-wordpress-a-response-to-your-letter/#comment-373462</guid>
		<description>you received a letter? :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you received a letter? :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

