<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Content vs. Typos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Arsenal Online</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-1128714</link>
		<dc:creator>Arsenal Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-1128714</guid>
		<description>I was looking through some of your posts on this site and I conceive this internet site is really instructive! Retain posting .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking through some of your posts on this site and I conceive this internet site is really instructive! Retain posting .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-1128160</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-1128160</guid>
		<description>Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is excellent, as well as the content!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is excellent, as well as the content!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-1126421</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-1126421</guid>
		<description>I’d must check with you here. Which isn’t one thing I usually do! I take pleasure in reading a post that may make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d must check with you here. Which isn’t one thing I usually do! I take pleasure in reading a post that may make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Cruz</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-411298</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Cruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-411298</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reminded of a college professor who set a limit of 5 errors (typos, grammatical errors) on the papers he graded.  The first thing he would do with a paper is scan for errors.  Anything with more than 5 errors gets returned immediately - the rest are graded as they normally would.  

If you make a few mistakes here and there, I can probably ignore them.  If, however, typos, misspelled words, and errors pepper your paragraphs and make everything harder to understand, I&#039;d probably just ignore the whole post, or even the whole blog or publication.  I think that&#039;s my version of returning your paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reminded of a college professor who set a limit of 5 errors (typos, grammatical errors) on the papers he graded.  The first thing he would do with a paper is scan for errors.  Anything with more than 5 errors gets returned immediately &#8211; the rest are graded as they normally would.  </p>
<p>If you make a few mistakes here and there, I can probably ignore them.  If, however, typos, misspelled words, and errors pepper your paragraphs and make everything harder to understand, I&#8217;d probably just ignore the whole post, or even the whole blog or publication.  I think that&#8217;s my version of returning your paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-409613</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-409613</guid>
		<description>Just because something is a &quot;fact of life&quot; doesn&#039;t mean we have to accept it. I&#039;m pretty strict on my own writing, and I have one of those nitpicky eyes that finds mistakes. But I also know it&#039;s hard to find every single mistake at times.

I see bloggers that I respect have typos every once in awhile, so I shrug. However, if I consistently see typos, the writer&#039;s credibility goes down in my opinion. Blogging is something that allows anyone a voice, but it&#039;s still a writer&#039;s medium. Consistent mistakes show that you don&#039;t respect the medium and the consumer of that medium.

As for those for whom English is a second language, if all they have to read is typo-ridden blogs on the Internet, they&#039;ll never master English. Let&#039;s take some pride in the medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because something is a &#8220;fact of life&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean we have to accept it. I&#8217;m pretty strict on my own writing, and I have one of those nitpicky eyes that finds mistakes. But I also know it&#8217;s hard to find every single mistake at times.</p>
<p>I see bloggers that I respect have typos every once in awhile, so I shrug. However, if I consistently see typos, the writer&#8217;s credibility goes down in my opinion. Blogging is something that allows anyone a voice, but it&#8217;s still a writer&#8217;s medium. Consistent mistakes show that you don&#8217;t respect the medium and the consumer of that medium.</p>
<p>As for those for whom English is a second language, if all they have to read is typo-ridden blogs on the Internet, they&#8217;ll never master English. Let&#8217;s take some pride in the medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-409505</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-409505</guid>
		<description>I have one &#039;critic&#039; who point out my typo&#039;s. I try to fix them but usually the ones that get through are the grammatical ones now with my words underlined in red in the browser. However, my blog is personal, its about my life, and quite frankly, I think if it has a few typos in it, then if a website tries to take the content for their own and dont&#039; run a grammer check, then I feel I have far greater grounds to prove the content originated from me. 

For articles I decide to lift and rework and publish for money, then yes, I will make an effort to make sure they are grammatically correct and all words are spelt properly. If I was hoping my blog was ever going to be something that could be sold, I might have made an effort from the start to make sure each essay was a glowing testimony to perfect English. But when its just me and my thoughts with no one paying me (I just hope people will like my travels enough to want to read more!), then I&#039;m not going to get worked up over spelling errors and not going to take anyone seriously who criticises my freely provided content!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one &#8216;critic&#8217; who point out my typo&#8217;s. I try to fix them but usually the ones that get through are the grammatical ones now with my words underlined in red in the browser. However, my blog is personal, its about my life, and quite frankly, I think if it has a few typos in it, then if a website tries to take the content for their own and dont&#8217; run a grammer check, then I feel I have far greater grounds to prove the content originated from me. </p>
<p>For articles I decide to lift and rework and publish for money, then yes, I will make an effort to make sure they are grammatically correct and all words are spelt properly. If I was hoping my blog was ever going to be something that could be sold, I might have made an effort from the start to make sure each essay was a glowing testimony to perfect English. But when its just me and my thoughts with no one paying me (I just hope people will like my travels enough to want to read more!), then I&#8217;m not going to get worked up over spelling errors and not going to take anyone seriously who criticises my freely provided content!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian L</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-409469</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-409469</guid>
		<description>Like I said to Penelope (a couple posts before writing her site off for good and removing it from my feed reader), it&#039;s a matter of respect.

Now, I&#039;m not the kind of person to point out a typo or two to a writer in public. I&#039;d probably email them, in fact. But when a writer tells me that they can&#039;t be bothered to spend the extra 90 seconds checking up on their spellchecker before hitting the &quot;Publish&quot; button because they are too busy to do so, it turns me right off.

Yes, the writer is spending time to bring me content. I respect that. But the more important fact here (and one that many writers would do well to remember) is that READERS ARE SPENDING THEIR TIME READING THOSE WORDS! And a lot of those sites are making money off those readers. Revenue or not, writers must learn to respect their readers.

If we&#039;re dealing in words, shouldn&#039;t they at least be spelled right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said to Penelope (a couple posts before writing her site off for good and removing it from my feed reader), it&#8217;s a matter of respect.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m not the kind of person to point out a typo or two to a writer in public. I&#8217;d probably email them, in fact. But when a writer tells me that they can&#8217;t be bothered to spend the extra 90 seconds checking up on their spellchecker before hitting the &#8220;Publish&#8221; button because they are too busy to do so, it turns me right off.</p>
<p>Yes, the writer is spending time to bring me content. I respect that. But the more important fact here (and one that many writers would do well to remember) is that READERS ARE SPENDING THEIR TIME READING THOSE WORDS! And a lot of those sites are making money off those readers. Revenue or not, writers must learn to respect their readers.</p>
<p>If we&#8217;re dealing in words, shouldn&#8217;t they at least be spelled right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-409253</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-409253</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a former journalist turned freelancer and political consultant. To boot, I&#039;m a horrible speller who depends heavily on spell checkers.

And while I believe that the most important part of any type of presentation — whether it be a blog or a presentation from a media firm — is the content, if bad grammar and poor spelling is the norm, then I&#039;ll pass on them every time.

In the race I&#039;m managing right now, a media firm didn&#039;t get an interview with us because of their cover letter. It was poorly written — full of typos and bad grammar. You just can&#039;t do that and be successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a former journalist turned freelancer and political consultant. To boot, I&#8217;m a horrible speller who depends heavily on spell checkers.</p>
<p>And while I believe that the most important part of any type of presentation — whether it be a blog or a presentation from a media firm — is the content, if bad grammar and poor spelling is the norm, then I&#8217;ll pass on them every time.</p>
<p>In the race I&#8217;m managing right now, a media firm didn&#8217;t get an interview with us because of their cover letter. It was poorly written — full of typos and bad grammar. You just can&#8217;t do that and be successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corvida</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-409224</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-409224</guid>
		<description>It wouldn&#039;t hurt to let a spell checker run it&#039;s course every now and again. However, Trunk is right, no need to be prissy about it.

On the other hand, that can be a highly irritating thing to see plenty of errors running through a post. A typo is fine. However, anything beyond that has a habit of becoming a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t hurt to let a spell checker run it&#8217;s course every now and again. However, Trunk is right, no need to be prissy about it.</p>
<p>On the other hand, that can be a highly irritating thing to see plenty of errors running through a post. A typo is fine. However, anything beyond that has a habit of becoming a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-409177</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-409177</guid>
		<description>Typos are sloppy. I understand that occasionally they slip into blog posts by accident, but when I see a post full of typos and grammar mistakes, I stop reading.

No, it&#039;s not fair, and maybe I&#039;ve missed great stuff this way. But I really think that if you care about your blog, you proofread before you hit &quot;publish&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typos are sloppy. I understand that occasionally they slip into blog posts by accident, but when I see a post full of typos and grammar mistakes, I stop reading.</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not fair, and maybe I&#8217;ve missed great stuff this way. But I really think that if you care about your blog, you proofread before you hit &#8220;publish&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-409140</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-409140</guid>
		<description>Typos I can forgive (although it can be a good indicator that someone&#039;s not using Firefox.) Bad grammar, on the other hand, can drive me batty. Sometimes, I may have to reread one sentence three times just it comprehend it. Why? One missing coma. Read the WordPress support forums? Notice the entries that have no replies. Those are usually the ones that leave you asking &quot;Uh, what was the question?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typos I can forgive (although it can be a good indicator that someone&#8217;s not using Firefox.) Bad grammar, on the other hand, can drive me batty. Sometimes, I may have to reread one sentence three times just it comprehend it. Why? One missing coma. Read the WordPress support forums? Notice the entries that have no replies. Those are usually the ones that leave you asking &#8220;Uh, what was the question?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-409139</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-409139</guid>
		<description>People tend to forget that blogging is, well, writing.  What do you want your writing to say about you?  You&#039;ve already shown that you&#039;re willing to go to the considerable trouble of establishing &amp; maintaining a blog, so why not also put an equal amount of effort into your writing skills as well?  Your blog content is largely what you&#039;ll be judged upon.

But, yeah, typos do happen.  But I also think it&#039;s completely legitimate to go back and correct minor typographical and/or grammatical errors if you spot them late down the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People tend to forget that blogging is, well, writing.  What do you want your writing to say about you?  You&#8217;ve already shown that you&#8217;re willing to go to the considerable trouble of establishing &amp; maintaining a blog, so why not also put an equal amount of effort into your writing skills as well?  Your blog content is largely what you&#8217;ll be judged upon.</p>
<p>But, yeah, typos do happen.  But I also think it&#8217;s completely legitimate to go back and correct minor typographical and/or grammatical errors if you spot them late down the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-409022</link>
		<dc:creator>Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-409022</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll forgive typos up to a point, but if they interfere with my comprehension of the article then it&#039;s just a waste of my time. Meaning, I can&#039;t understand what the writer is saying because of poor spelling / grammar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll forgive typos up to a point, but if they interfere with my comprehension of the article then it&#8217;s just a waste of my time. Meaning, I can&#8217;t understand what the writer is saying because of poor spelling / grammar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Foley</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-408980</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-408980</guid>
		<description>The quality of writing in blogs depends greatly on the level of correct grammar and spelling in one&#039;s postings.  Nevertheless, I&#039;ve been guilty several times of terrible typos that I somehow misssed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of writing in blogs depends greatly on the level of correct grammar and spelling in one&#8217;s postings.  Nevertheless, I&#8217;ve been guilty several times of terrible typos that I somehow misssed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wetherington</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-408950</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wetherington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-408950</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re all human and we all make mistakes, but if I see an inordinate amount of spelling and grammatical errors it causes me to question the writer&#039;s level of pride, committment and professionalism in their own work. That includes my own if I rush to publish something without carefully reviewing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re all human and we all make mistakes, but if I see an inordinate amount of spelling and grammatical errors it causes me to question the writer&#8217;s level of pride, committment and professionalism in their own work. That includes my own if I rush to publish something without carefully reviewing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silky</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/comment-page-1/#comment-408933</link>
		<dc:creator>Silky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/15/blog-content-vs-typos/#comment-408933</guid>
		<description>I think the bottom line is that communicating with your audience is the most important part of a blog post (regardless of how you spell it).

However, if you are a pro-blogger, come on, have some pride in your work and check for typos before publishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the bottom line is that communicating with your audience is the most important part of a blog post (regardless of how you spell it).</p>
<p>However, if you are a pro-blogger, come on, have some pride in your work and check for typos before publishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

