<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trackback Declared Dead&#8230; Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Phothirathhttp://www.chilggoooto.com</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1128634</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Phothirathhttp://www.chilggoooto.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 09:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/#comment-1128634</guid>
		<description>Hello there, just was aware of your weblog thru Google,my site is http://www.chilggoooto.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there, just was aware of your weblog thru Google,my site is <a href="http://www.chilggoooto.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.chilggoooto.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard H. Serlin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-453031</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard H. Serlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/#comment-453031</guid>
		<description>The problem I have with Trackback is it just doesn&#039;t work. I just started a Blogger blog and added Haloscan for Trackback. I sent out two pings; both times Haloscan said they were successful, but both times they never showed up on the target blogs, which did have Trackback.

I&#039;ve looked through several of the blogs I&#039;m interested in, going through dozens of posts, and hundreds of comments, and I only saw just 1 successful Trackback! 

It just doesn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I have with Trackback is it just doesn&#8217;t work. I just started a Blogger blog and added Haloscan for Trackback. I sent out two pings; both times Haloscan said they were successful, but both times they never showed up on the target blogs, which did have Trackback.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve looked through several of the blogs I&#8217;m interested in, going through dozens of posts, and hundreds of comments, and I only saw just 1 successful Trackback! </p>
<p>It just doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-421460</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/#comment-421460</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never really thought about the distinction between trackbacks and pingbacks, and just assumed when people say &#039;trackback&#039; they also lump pingbacks into that statement. That is, they&#039;re describing both.

If the distinction is made though, I would agree that trackbacks are largely dead. I know of very few people who manually trackback anything, which makes sense when you consider how convenient it is to let an automatic pingback do all the work. 

Indeed, I&#039;d consider pingback an evolution of trackback. It&#039;s the newer, better version of effectively the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never really thought about the distinction between trackbacks and pingbacks, and just assumed when people say &#8216;trackback&#8217; they also lump pingbacks into that statement. That is, they&#8217;re describing both.</p>
<p>If the distinction is made though, I would agree that trackbacks are largely dead. I know of very few people who manually trackback anything, which makes sense when you consider how convenient it is to let an automatic pingback do all the work. </p>
<p>Indeed, I&#8217;d consider pingback an evolution of trackback. It&#8217;s the newer, better version of effectively the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corvida</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-420036</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/04/21/trackback-declared-dead-again/#comment-420036</guid>
		<description>I definitely don&#039;t think Trackback is dead nor should it be deleted. It should definitely be expanded upon, but it&#039;s extremely useful for research and relation purposes and also to know who&#039;s responding a topic or post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely don&#8217;t think Trackback is dead nor should it be deleted. It should definitely be expanded upon, but it&#8217;s extremely useful for research and relation purposes and also to know who&#8217;s responding a topic or post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

