<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BusinessWeek: Don&#8217;t Link to Us!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch Arsenal</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-1129235</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch Arsenal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 05:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-1129235</guid>
		<description>Basically, admirable what you’ve carried out here. It truly is pleasing to appear you express from the heart as well as your clarity on this significant material might be simply looked. Impressive post and will look ahead to your future update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, admirable what you’ve carried out here. It truly is pleasing to appear you express from the heart as well as your clarity on this significant material might be simply looked. Impressive post and will look ahead to your future update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-1127218</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-1127218</guid>
		<description>Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you However I’m experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Regards, Garden Furniture Manufacturer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you However I’m experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Regards, Garden Furniture Manufacturer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-1126441</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-1126441</guid>
		<description>I enjoy what you guys are usually up too. This sort of clever work and exposure! Keep up the great works guys I’ve added you guys to our blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy what you guys are usually up too. This sort of clever work and exposure! Keep up the great works guys I’ve added you guys to our blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-1125534</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-1125534</guid>
		<description>Hello just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fern R</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-450459</link>
		<dc:creator>Fern R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 06:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-450459</guid>
		<description>Please delete this comment, I just forgot to check the &quot;Notify me of followup comments via e-mail&quot; box. BTW, do you guys have a comments RSS feed? If not, why not?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please delete this comment, I just forgot to check the &#8220;Notify me of followup comments via e-mail&#8221; box. BTW, do you guys have a comments RSS feed? If not, why not?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fern R</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-450457</link>
		<dc:creator>Fern R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 06:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-450457</guid>
		<description>1) I don&#039;t see where BW said that people cannot link to their website. Admittedly I skimmed and searched for the word &quot;link.&quot;

2) Off the top of my head, I don&#039;t think BW has any way to legally enforce their request that people not link to their site (if that is in fact what they are doing). Copyright law has always permitted people to quote small portions of a written text and paraphrase for the purpose of commenting on it. Yet the BW user agreement says, &quot;The User may not commingle any portion of BW.com with any other information and shall not edit, modify, or alter any portion.&quot; I don&#039;t see how BW would be able to get around the First Amendment by extending their copyright as far as they are attempting to do.

I&#039;m not an expert in this area of law, and I would be surprised if any court has had the opportunity to analyze First Amendment rights, copyright law and contract law under these cricumstances...but my two cents is that they are beyond the bounds of their legal rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I don&#8217;t see where BW said that people cannot link to their website. Admittedly I skimmed and searched for the word &#8220;link.&#8221;</p>
<p>2) Off the top of my head, I don&#8217;t think BW has any way to legally enforce their request that people not link to their site (if that is in fact what they are doing). Copyright law has always permitted people to quote small portions of a written text and paraphrase for the purpose of commenting on it. Yet the BW user agreement says, &#8220;The User may not commingle any portion of BW.com with any other information and shall not edit, modify, or alter any portion.&#8221; I don&#8217;t see how BW would be able to get around the First Amendment by extending their copyright as far as they are attempting to do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an expert in this area of law, and I would be surprised if any court has had the opportunity to analyze First Amendment rights, copyright law and contract law under these cricumstances&#8230;but my two cents is that they are beyond the bounds of their legal rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-450228</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 07:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-450228</guid>
		<description>One of my blogs is an office/business type blog and I link to them fairly often. Or did I guess. This is a really lame decision. Especially since many bloggers provide both links, i.e. read (this article) that&#039;s at (blah website). That&#039;s basic etiquette I tend to follow, but I&#039;m not sending my readers on some treasure hunt. Like; &quot;once you get to BW, click on news, then December, then scroll down the page...&quot; I mean really; how lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my blogs is an office/business type blog and I link to them fairly often. Or did I guess. This is a really lame decision. Especially since many bloggers provide both links, i.e. read (this article) that&#8217;s at (blah website). That&#8217;s basic etiquette I tend to follow, but I&#8217;m not sending my readers on some treasure hunt. Like; &#8220;once you get to BW, click on news, then December, then scroll down the page&#8230;&#8221; I mean really; how lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BusinessWeek Doesn&#8217;t Want Your Links at the Dark Corner</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-450209</link>
		<dc:creator>BusinessWeek Doesn&#8217;t Want Your Links at the Dark Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-450209</guid>
		<description>[...] The Blog Herald, and CNET have already picked up the story, and I&#8217;m sure several others will be following [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Blog Herald, and CNET have already picked up the story, and I&#8217;m sure several others will be following [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrG</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-450109</link>
		<dc:creator>mrG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-450109</guid>
		<description>Heh, well, just to show that things CAN get a great deal worse, let me tell you about my experience with a local regional newspaper, quite a big one actually (most small newspapers belong to conglomerates) but here&#039;s what happened: I had a Google News RSS feed in the sidebar of a small local community website (dozens of member! ;) and I get a phonecall threatening legal action if I don&#039;t desist in using their headlines!  Excuse me?

You see, she didn&#039;t know that Google scans &#039;news&#039; sites and offers the results for syndication.  &quot;That&#039;s going to STOP!&quot; she proclaimed and I said OK, you stop them, you&#039;ll no longer see your precious news headlines on my site.  I even gave her the precise link to google&#039;s opt-out form.

For a long time, I saw no headlines from them, but I&#039;m starting to see some now.  No doubt they found &quot;the problem&quot; and fired the bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, well, just to show that things CAN get a great deal worse, let me tell you about my experience with a local regional newspaper, quite a big one actually (most small newspapers belong to conglomerates) but here&#8217;s what happened: I had a Google News RSS feed in the sidebar of a small local community website (dozens of member! ;) and I get a phonecall threatening legal action if I don&#8217;t desist in using their headlines!  Excuse me?</p>
<p>You see, she didn&#8217;t know that Google scans &#8216;news&#8217; sites and offers the results for syndication.  &#8220;That&#8217;s going to STOP!&#8221; she proclaimed and I said OK, you stop them, you&#8217;ll no longer see your precious news headlines on my site.  I even gave her the precise link to google&#8217;s opt-out form.</p>
<p>For a long time, I saw no headlines from them, but I&#8217;m starting to see some now.  No doubt they found &#8220;the problem&#8221; and fired the bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Biographer™ &#187; BusinessWeek: Don&#8217;t Link to Us!</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-449997</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Biographer™ &#187; BusinessWeek: Don&#8217;t Link to Us!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-449997</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Petherick</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-449993</link>
		<dc:creator>David Petherick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-449993</guid>
		<description>Stupid. Coincidentally, I just helped someone who&#039;s writing an article for them with about a dozen really savvy links. 

So maybe next time... yeah. I think it&#039;s the legal wonks again - lawyers are to the Blogosphere what Napalm was to Vietnamese civilians.

I&#039;ve dugg it - Digg it up folks: http://httv.biz/bizweak/ 

regards, David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid. Coincidentally, I just helped someone who&#8217;s writing an article for them with about a dozen really savvy links. </p>
<p>So maybe next time&#8230; yeah. I think it&#8217;s the legal wonks again &#8211; lawyers are to the Blogosphere what Napalm was to Vietnamese civilians.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve dugg it &#8211; Digg it up folks: <a href="http://httv.biz/bizweak/" rel="nofollow">http://httv.biz/bizweak/</a> </p>
<p>regards, David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Angelo Racoma</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-449963</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-449963</guid>
		<description>Been like that for as long as I can remember  - http://racoma.com.ph/archives/on-linking-policies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been like that for as long as I can remember  &#8211; <a href="http://racoma.com.ph/archives/on-linking-policies" rel="nofollow">http://racoma.com.ph/archives/on-linking-policies</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solo Business Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-449953</link>
		<dc:creator>Solo Business Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-449953</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t link? Perhaps BusinessWeek hasn&#039;t yet digested the scope and definition of &quot;online presence.&quot;

This is the medium where we read, comment, and share. It&#039;s okay if an entity doesn&#039;t want to participate. Just don&#039;t be here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t link? Perhaps BusinessWeek hasn&#8217;t yet digested the scope and definition of &#8220;online presence.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the medium where we read, comment, and share. It&#8217;s okay if an entity doesn&#8217;t want to participate. Just don&#8217;t be here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-449942</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-449942</guid>
		<description>About as stupid as the subject-verb disagreement in your fourth sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About as stupid as the subject-verb disagreement in your fourth sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro2pt0</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-449933</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro2pt0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/05/09/businessweek-dont-link-to-us/#comment-449933</guid>
		<description>It is indeed pretty stupid, but not new. I remember a similar popular site which this happened to just a few months ago and I heard about it on the Buzz Out Loud podcast. It dealt with the same exact issue which makes me think that BusinessWeek and some other companies/sites went through the same legal service to prepare their user agreements. 

In fact, there was an entire website devoted to these stupid YOU CAN&#039;T LINK TO US orders. Check it out here http://www.dontlink.com/ it hasn&#039;t been updated in years, I think it&#039;s time it came out of hibernation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed pretty stupid, but not new. I remember a similar popular site which this happened to just a few months ago and I heard about it on the Buzz Out Loud podcast. It dealt with the same exact issue which makes me think that BusinessWeek and some other companies/sites went through the same legal service to prepare their user agreements. </p>
<p>In fact, there was an entire website devoted to these stupid YOU CAN&#8217;T LINK TO US orders. Check it out here <a href="http://www.dontlink.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dontlink.com/</a> it hasn&#8217;t been updated in years, I think it&#8217;s time it came out of hibernation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

