<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is it &#8220;Gaming&#8221; or Fair Play?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: William Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/comment-page-1/#comment-484995</link>
		<dc:creator>William Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/#comment-484995</guid>
		<description>Life is a game, and business is certainly a game.  

I wouldn&#039;t feel too bad about gaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life is a game, and business is certainly a game.  </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t feel too bad about gaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/comment-page-1/#comment-475218</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/#comment-475218</guid>
		<description>Yeah I think that is more how I feel, some people just take advantage but while we have a choice I don&#039;t think it is gaming just annoying :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I think that is more how I feel, some people just take advantage but while we have a choice I don&#8217;t think it is gaming just annoying :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/comment-page-1/#comment-475087</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/#comment-475087</guid>
		<description>I have pretty much given up on Digg as it seems to be run by a whole bunch of cliques.  If you aren&#039;t part of the &#039;in crown&#039; your diggs barely register.  Not sure if this counts as gaming the system though? 

I am not afraid to point out good content to a few select people and ask for their digg or stumble support but I always preface my request with &quot;if you like it&quot; and do it sparingly.  

I have a few people that ask me quite regularily without thinking about whether or not the content is of interest to me or if I think it&#039;s good.

Gaming the system, I don&#039;t know but I know the latter group drives me nuts and I&#039;m inclined to ignore their requests after a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have pretty much given up on Digg as it seems to be run by a whole bunch of cliques.  If you aren&#8217;t part of the &#8216;in crown&#8217; your diggs barely register.  Not sure if this counts as gaming the system though? </p>
<p>I am not afraid to point out good content to a few select people and ask for their digg or stumble support but I always preface my request with &#8220;if you like it&#8221; and do it sparingly.  </p>
<p>I have a few people that ask me quite regularily without thinking about whether or not the content is of interest to me or if I think it&#8217;s good.</p>
<p>Gaming the system, I don&#8217;t know but I know the latter group drives me nuts and I&#8217;m inclined to ignore their requests after a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gogle</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/comment-page-1/#comment-473531</link>
		<dc:creator>gogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/#comment-473531</guid>
		<description>Of course, the only reason that Stumbleupon do this is that they also have a paid advertising platform and they don’t want to give away any kind of free publicity for sites. It’s a shame and I reckon it will hold them back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the only reason that Stumbleupon do this is that they also have a paid advertising platform and they don’t want to give away any kind of free publicity for sites. It’s a shame and I reckon it will hold them back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/comment-page-1/#comment-472598</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/#comment-472598</guid>
		<description>I have heard now if you stumble your own stuff, rather than get you banned, it just has a reduced effect, down to zero. But that is same for any user routinely stumbling the same domain over and over, not just your own.

Yes I think putting quality stuff in front of people and leaving them the option of voting or not, while not every users idea of &quot;good and proper&quot; is far from unethical, and in fact might be a good thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard now if you stumble your own stuff, rather than get you banned, it just has a reduced effect, down to zero. But that is same for any user routinely stumbling the same domain over and over, not just your own.</p>
<p>Yes I think putting quality stuff in front of people and leaving them the option of voting or not, while not every users idea of &#8220;good and proper&#8221; is far from unethical, and in fact might be a good thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoingLikeSixty</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/comment-page-1/#comment-472507</link>
		<dc:creator>GoingLikeSixty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/#comment-472507</guid>
		<description>If I can motivate thousands, well, tens, of people do Digg or Stumble me, what is the harm?
Isn&#039;t this the binary version of Word of Mouth?

@Tom: I stumble my own stuff regularly and haven&#039;t been banned (yet)

Yahoo Buzz is inviting pubishers to Buzz Up their posts.
http://www.trendhunter.com/community</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I can motivate thousands, well, tens, of people do Digg or Stumble me, what is the harm?<br />
Isn&#8217;t this the binary version of Word of Mouth?</p>
<p>@Tom: I stumble my own stuff regularly and haven&#8217;t been banned (yet)</p>
<p>Yahoo Buzz is inviting pubishers to Buzz Up their posts.<br />
<a href="http://www.trendhunter.com/community" rel="nofollow">http://www.trendhunter.com/community</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/comment-page-1/#comment-472435</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/04/when-is-it-gaming-or-fair-play/#comment-472435</guid>
		<description>I happen to think that as long as you&#039;re not cheating anyone, no technique for getting your content to more people is wrong.

I was pretty disappointed to discover that Stumbleupon ban you from submitting pages from the same site if you do it more than about a dozen times. Forever. I had used this method (among many others) to publicise good quality, relevant content which would go to people who were looking specifically for that type of content. I didn&#039;t stumble every post, just the most interesting ones. And people seemed to like them.

Of course, the only reason that Stumbleupon do this is that they also have a paid advertising platform and they don&#039;t want to give away any kind of free publicity for sites. It&#039;s a shame and I reckon it will hold them back.

As to things being called &#039;immoral&#039; this just sounds like the usual internet hyperbole to me. Things get a hell of a lot more &#039;immoral&#039; than gaming Digg!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to think that as long as you&#8217;re not cheating anyone, no technique for getting your content to more people is wrong.</p>
<p>I was pretty disappointed to discover that Stumbleupon ban you from submitting pages from the same site if you do it more than about a dozen times. Forever. I had used this method (among many others) to publicise good quality, relevant content which would go to people who were looking specifically for that type of content. I didn&#8217;t stumble every post, just the most interesting ones. And people seemed to like them.</p>
<p>Of course, the only reason that Stumbleupon do this is that they also have a paid advertising platform and they don&#8217;t want to give away any kind of free publicity for sites. It&#8217;s a shame and I reckon it will hold them back.</p>
<p>As to things being called &#8216;immoral&#8217; this just sounds like the usual internet hyperbole to me. Things get a hell of a lot more &#8216;immoral&#8217; than gaming Digg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

