<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rise of the Stumble Cynic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/05/rise-of-the-stumble-cynic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/05/rise-of-the-stumble-cynic/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane Morgan &#124; Niche Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/05/rise-of-the-stumble-cynic/comment-page-1/#comment-589634</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane Morgan &#124; Niche Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8338#comment-589634</guid>
		<description>It really is bizarre, I don&#039;t get some of these people at all. It&#039;s almost like they must have set up their tags specifically to show them stuff they won&#039;t like.

I don&#039;t even thumb something down just because I don&#039;t like it, I just stumble on. I only thumb something down if it is truly bad. As in unreadable, un researched, spam... 

Though at first I thumbed down anything that I simply wasn&#039;t interested in because it seemed that was the purpose because they say if you thumb it down you won&#039;t see sites like that any more. But then I realized that there is an actual element of voting to it, and just because it isn&#039;t interesting to me doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s &quot;bad&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is bizarre, I don&#8217;t get some of these people at all. It&#8217;s almost like they must have set up their tags specifically to show them stuff they won&#8217;t like.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even thumb something down just because I don&#8217;t like it, I just stumble on. I only thumb something down if it is truly bad. As in unreadable, un researched, spam&#8230; </p>
<p>Though at first I thumbed down anything that I simply wasn&#8217;t interested in because it seemed that was the purpose because they say if you thumb it down you won&#8217;t see sites like that any more. But then I realized that there is an actual element of voting to it, and just because it isn&#8217;t interesting to me doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s &#8220;bad&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob from Group Writing Projects</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/05/rise-of-the-stumble-cynic/comment-page-1/#comment-588482</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob from Group Writing Projects</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8338#comment-588482</guid>
		<description>There is something you can do. When you see someone going overboard and unfairly thumbing down, you can &#039;flag them&#039;.

For example: http://tinyurl.com/6o466g

In the reviews list, you&#039;ll see that on the right there&#039;s a &#039;Flag This&#039; dropdown. Click it, and you can vote if a person is helpful, a spammer, etc.

As to what effect that has on the stumble cynic, only SU knows for now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something you can do. When you see someone going overboard and unfairly thumbing down, you can &#8216;flag them&#8217;.</p>
<p>For example: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6o466g" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6o466g</a></p>
<p>In the reviews list, you&#8217;ll see that on the right there&#8217;s a &#8216;Flag This&#8217; dropdown. Click it, and you can vote if a person is helpful, a spammer, etc.</p>
<p>As to what effect that has on the stumble cynic, only SU knows for now :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

