<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trademark and Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/trademark-and-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/trademark-and-blogs/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Niesha Wraggs</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/trademark-and-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1132015</link>
		<dc:creator>Niesha Wraggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8545#comment-1132015</guid>
		<description>my girl friend wanted to know something about this, ill point them to your webpage, thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my girl friend wanted to know something about this, ill point them to your webpage, thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/trademark-and-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1105315</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8545#comment-1105315</guid>
		<description>This is very useful information.  It is very important to protect your mark, logo or slogan.  You can easily do this through an affordable and reliable company: www.thetrademarkcompany.com.  They come highly recommended.  Thanks for the article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very useful information.  It is very important to protect your mark, logo or slogan.  You can easily do this through an affordable and reliable company: <a href="http://www.thetrademarkcompany.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetrademarkcompany.com</a>.  They come highly recommended.  Thanks for the article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilly Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/trademark-and-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-603972</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilly Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8545#comment-603972</guid>
		<description>This is so useful, and such a well timed piece. I recently, a few days ago, had a run-in with trademark laws. This article would have been an even better read then...

I run an online blogging magazine for female bloggers. We&#039;re small (much smaller than Sarah Palin). But we used the term &#039;blogher&#039; in our slogan and navigation keys. This infringed on www.Blogher.com - &#039;blogher&#039; is trademarked.

At the time I felt the term &#039;blogher&#039; was like &#039;blogger&#039; or &#039;weblog&#039; - a hybrid term, free for use and already in common use.

After some heated debate, however, this term was removed from the blogs primary level.

Your article clears things up for me though, and I believe it was right to remove the term.

In conclusion, Blogher.com was thoroughly professional and polite. Thankfully the situation ended happily-ever-after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so useful, and such a well timed piece. I recently, a few days ago, had a run-in with trademark laws. This article would have been an even better read then&#8230;</p>
<p>I run an online blogging magazine for female bloggers. We&#8217;re small (much smaller than Sarah Palin). But we used the term &#8216;blogher&#8217; in our slogan and navigation keys. This infringed on <a href="http://www.Blogher.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Blogher.com</a> &#8211; &#8216;blogher&#8217; is trademarked.</p>
<p>At the time I felt the term &#8216;blogher&#8217; was like &#8216;blogger&#8217; or &#8216;weblog&#8217; &#8211; a hybrid term, free for use and already in common use.</p>
<p>After some heated debate, however, this term was removed from the blogs primary level.</p>
<p>Your article clears things up for me though, and I believe it was right to remove the term.</p>
<p>In conclusion, Blogher.com was thoroughly professional and polite. Thankfully the situation ended happily-ever-after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

